男性的一般智力与异性恋爱关系的结果

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112902
Gavin S. Vance, Tara DeLecce, Todd K. Shackelford
{"title":"男性的一般智力与异性恋爱关系的结果","authors":"Gavin S. Vance,&nbsp;Tara DeLecce,&nbsp;Todd K. Shackelford","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research has established that higher general intelligence is associated with a range of favorable life outcomes, including academic and workplace achievement, and socioeconomic status. Recent work also has explored the potential role of specific cognitive abilities in navigating romantic relationship problems, and mitigating undesirable relationship outcomes such as infidelity and partner-directed violence. Less research has investigated the associations between <em>general</em> intelligence and outcomes for romantic relationships. The present research analyzed data secured from a sample of heterosexual, partnered men (<em>N</em> = 202) to investigate associations between men's intelligence and several variables related to romantic relationship phenomena and functioning, including partner-directed insults, desire for power in intimate relationships, and erectile dysfunction. Results revealed that men's general intelligence, and in particular, their performance on letter number series items, was negatively associated with a range of aversive, partner-directed behaviors including insults, sexual coercion, and cost-inflicting mate retention tactics, as well as several individual difference variables including men's sociosexual orientation, erectile dysfunction, and psychopathy. Conversely, men's general intelligence was positively associated with their self-reported relationship investment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Men's general intelligence and heterosexual romantic relationship outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Gavin S. Vance,&nbsp;Tara DeLecce,&nbsp;Todd K. Shackelford\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Research has established that higher general intelligence is associated with a range of favorable life outcomes, including academic and workplace achievement, and socioeconomic status. Recent work also has explored the potential role of specific cognitive abilities in navigating romantic relationship problems, and mitigating undesirable relationship outcomes such as infidelity and partner-directed violence. Less research has investigated the associations between <em>general</em> intelligence and outcomes for romantic relationships. The present research analyzed data secured from a sample of heterosexual, partnered men (<em>N</em> = 202) to investigate associations between men's intelligence and several variables related to romantic relationship phenomena and functioning, including partner-directed insults, desire for power in intimate relationships, and erectile dysfunction. Results revealed that men's general intelligence, and in particular, their performance on letter number series items, was negatively associated with a range of aversive, partner-directed behaviors including insults, sexual coercion, and cost-inflicting mate retention tactics, as well as several individual difference variables including men's sociosexual orientation, erectile dysfunction, and psychopathy. Conversely, men's general intelligence was positively associated with their self-reported relationship investment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003623\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究证实,较高的一般智力与一系列有利的生活结果有关,包括学业和工作场所的成就以及社会经济地位。最近的研究还探讨了特定认知能力在解决恋爱关系问题、减少不忠和伴侣暴力等不良恋爱关系结果方面的潜在作用。对一般智力与恋爱关系结果之间关系的研究较少。本研究分析了从有伴侣的异性恋男性样本(N = 202)中获得的数据,以调查男性智力与几个与恋爱关系现象和功能相关的变量之间的关系,包括伴侣直接侮辱、亲密关系中的权力欲望和勃起功能障碍。结果发现,男性的一般智力,尤其是他们在字母数字系列项目上的表现,与一系列厌恶性的、以伴侣为导向的行为(包括侮辱、性胁迫和有损成本的配偶挽留策略)以及一些个体差异变量(包括男性的社会性倾向、勃起功能障碍和心理变态)呈负相关。相反,男性的一般智力与他们自我报告的关系投资呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Men's general intelligence and heterosexual romantic relationship outcomes
Research has established that higher general intelligence is associated with a range of favorable life outcomes, including academic and workplace achievement, and socioeconomic status. Recent work also has explored the potential role of specific cognitive abilities in navigating romantic relationship problems, and mitigating undesirable relationship outcomes such as infidelity and partner-directed violence. Less research has investigated the associations between general intelligence and outcomes for romantic relationships. The present research analyzed data secured from a sample of heterosexual, partnered men (N = 202) to investigate associations between men's intelligence and several variables related to romantic relationship phenomena and functioning, including partner-directed insults, desire for power in intimate relationships, and erectile dysfunction. Results revealed that men's general intelligence, and in particular, their performance on letter number series items, was negatively associated with a range of aversive, partner-directed behaviors including insults, sexual coercion, and cost-inflicting mate retention tactics, as well as several individual difference variables including men's sociosexual orientation, erectile dysfunction, and psychopathy. Conversely, men's general intelligence was positively associated with their self-reported relationship investment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Ambition as a doubled-edged sword: Career success and unethical behavior Different shades of narcissism at work: The relationships of narcissism dimensions with work-related outcomes The relation between adverse experiences and proactive aggression: The moderating role of emotional sensitivity Religious perfectionism, spiritual struggles, and sense of community: Associations with depression among ultra-Orthodox Jews Linking personality to gratitude in the Chinese context: The mediating role of regulatory emotional self-efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1