影响农民逐步采用稻田养鱼综合系统及其复发的因素

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural Systems Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104142
Yunxiao Bai , Cheng Chen , Xiaoshuang Li , Moucheng Liu
{"title":"影响农民逐步采用稻田养鱼综合系统及其复发的因素","authors":"Yunxiao Bai ,&nbsp;Cheng Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaoshuang Li ,&nbsp;Moucheng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Integrated farming systems provide high protein and energy yields per unit of land and increase farm income, particularly for smallholder farmers in land-scarce areas. However, the adoption rate by farmers is low, and some farmers discontinue after adoption (relapse).</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>We have three objectives, first, to subdivide the adoption stages of farmers and explore the influencing factors that affect each stage. Second to examine the factors that lead farmers to relapse. Third to test the similarity between these factors.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>In this study, we applied a modified transtheoretical model of behavioral change combined with key concepts from the theory of planned behavior to data collected from farmers adopting an integrated rice–fish system in Sanjiang County, China.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>We refined the adoption process into four progressive behavioral stages (pre-contemplation, contemplation, pre-maintenance, and maintenance) and an additional unexpected stage (relapse). As the stages progressed, the effect of family farm income transitioned from negative to positive. In all stages, farmers with stronger perceived behavioral control over finance and technology were more likely to change to more advanced stages. Factors such as attitude toward economic benefits, subjective norms, government and policy evaluations, and family laborers is related to farmers' relapse. We also demonstrated that the factors incentivizing farmers to progress to more advanced behavioral stages were not the same as those leading to relapse. Thus, policymakers must consider and address these inconsistencies.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study provides new insights into integrated farming adoption and relapse and has implications for designing intervention policies for farmers at different behavioral stages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 104142"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing the progressive adoption of integrated rice-fish systems by farmers and its relapse\",\"authors\":\"Yunxiao Bai ,&nbsp;Cheng Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaoshuang Li ,&nbsp;Moucheng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Integrated farming systems provide high protein and energy yields per unit of land and increase farm income, particularly for smallholder farmers in land-scarce areas. However, the adoption rate by farmers is low, and some farmers discontinue after adoption (relapse).</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>We have three objectives, first, to subdivide the adoption stages of farmers and explore the influencing factors that affect each stage. Second to examine the factors that lead farmers to relapse. Third to test the similarity between these factors.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>In this study, we applied a modified transtheoretical model of behavioral change combined with key concepts from the theory of planned behavior to data collected from farmers adopting an integrated rice–fish system in Sanjiang County, China.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>We refined the adoption process into four progressive behavioral stages (pre-contemplation, contemplation, pre-maintenance, and maintenance) and an additional unexpected stage (relapse). As the stages progressed, the effect of family farm income transitioned from negative to positive. In all stages, farmers with stronger perceived behavioral control over finance and technology were more likely to change to more advanced stages. Factors such as attitude toward economic benefits, subjective norms, government and policy evaluations, and family laborers is related to farmers' relapse. We also demonstrated that the factors incentivizing farmers to progress to more advanced behavioral stages were not the same as those leading to relapse. Thus, policymakers must consider and address these inconsistencies.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study provides new insights into integrated farming adoption and relapse and has implications for designing intervention policies for farmers at different behavioral stages.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"221 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002920\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002920","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景综合耕作系统可在单位土地上提供高蛋白和高能量,并增加农业收入,尤其是对土地稀缺地区的小农而言。我们有三个目标:第一,细分农民的采用阶段,探讨影响各阶段的影响因素。第二,研究导致农民重新采用的因素。结果与结论我们将采用过程细化为四个渐进的行为阶段(前考虑、考虑、维持前和维持)和一个额外的意外阶段(复发)。随着各阶段的进展,家庭农场收入的影响由负转正。在所有阶段中,对资金和技术有较强行为控制感知的农民更有可能进入更高级阶段。对经济效益的态度、主观规范、政府和政策评价以及家庭劳动力等因素与农民的复种有关。我们还证明,激励农民进入更高级行为阶段的因素与导致复发的因素并不相同。本研究为综合农业的采用和复发提供了新的见解,并对为处于不同行为阶段的农民设计干预政策产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors influencing the progressive adoption of integrated rice-fish systems by farmers and its relapse

CONTEXT

Integrated farming systems provide high protein and energy yields per unit of land and increase farm income, particularly for smallholder farmers in land-scarce areas. However, the adoption rate by farmers is low, and some farmers discontinue after adoption (relapse).

OBJECTIVE

We have three objectives, first, to subdivide the adoption stages of farmers and explore the influencing factors that affect each stage. Second to examine the factors that lead farmers to relapse. Third to test the similarity between these factors.

METHODS

In this study, we applied a modified transtheoretical model of behavioral change combined with key concepts from the theory of planned behavior to data collected from farmers adopting an integrated rice–fish system in Sanjiang County, China.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

We refined the adoption process into four progressive behavioral stages (pre-contemplation, contemplation, pre-maintenance, and maintenance) and an additional unexpected stage (relapse). As the stages progressed, the effect of family farm income transitioned from negative to positive. In all stages, farmers with stronger perceived behavioral control over finance and technology were more likely to change to more advanced stages. Factors such as attitude toward economic benefits, subjective norms, government and policy evaluations, and family laborers is related to farmers' relapse. We also demonstrated that the factors incentivizing farmers to progress to more advanced behavioral stages were not the same as those leading to relapse. Thus, policymakers must consider and address these inconsistencies.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study provides new insights into integrated farming adoption and relapse and has implications for designing intervention policies for farmers at different behavioral stages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
期刊最新文献
Lowering the greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from grassland-based dairy production The dairy production system in the north of Sweden under possible future food scenarios A pathway for decreasing the water footprint from grazing-based beef production systems in the Tropics How to use residual biomass streams in circular food systems to minimise land use or GHG emissions Win-win or lose-win? Economic-climatic synergies and trade-offs in dual-purpose cattle systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1