为本科生开发基于体裁的研究文章阅读模块

IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of English for Academic Purposes Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101448
{"title":"为本科生开发基于体裁的研究文章阅读模块","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although research articles (henceforth RA) have been widely used in undergraduate teaching as assigned readings or supplementary teaching materials, studies addressing students' challenges in RA reading are infrequent. We conducted a two-cycle action research to examine the effect of genre instruction on RA reading comprehension of Year 3 and 4 undergraduate students in economics. In Cycle 1, students (n = 34) were introduced to move structures of conventional sections, including Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion; in Cycle 2, students (n = 34) were introduced to a discipline-specific move model of economics. Apart from the conventional sections, the model used in Cycle 2 also describes the rhetorical structure of discipline-specific sections, such as Theoretical Model, Econometric Model, Robustness, and Mechanisms. Summary writing and multiple-choice tests were used to measure students' improvements in reading comprehension. The findings show that Cycle 2 instruction significantly improved students’ performance in summary writing (medium effect size) and multiple-choice tests (small effect size), whereas Cycle 1 instruction did not. Also, fewer students in Cycle 2 perceived cognitive overload challenges than their peers in Cycle 1. The findings can be useful for EAP practitioners teaching similar cohorts of students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a genre-based research article reading module for undergraduate students\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Although research articles (henceforth RA) have been widely used in undergraduate teaching as assigned readings or supplementary teaching materials, studies addressing students' challenges in RA reading are infrequent. We conducted a two-cycle action research to examine the effect of genre instruction on RA reading comprehension of Year 3 and 4 undergraduate students in economics. In Cycle 1, students (n = 34) were introduced to move structures of conventional sections, including Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion; in Cycle 2, students (n = 34) were introduced to a discipline-specific move model of economics. Apart from the conventional sections, the model used in Cycle 2 also describes the rhetorical structure of discipline-specific sections, such as Theoretical Model, Econometric Model, Robustness, and Mechanisms. Summary writing and multiple-choice tests were used to measure students' improvements in reading comprehension. The findings show that Cycle 2 instruction significantly improved students’ performance in summary writing (medium effect size) and multiple-choice tests (small effect size), whereas Cycle 1 instruction did not. Also, fewer students in Cycle 2 perceived cognitive overload challenges than their peers in Cycle 1. The findings can be useful for EAP practitioners teaching similar cohorts of students.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of English for Academic Purposes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of English for Academic Purposes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158524001164\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158524001164","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管研究性文章(以下简称RA)作为指定读物或辅助教材被广泛应用于本科教学中,但针对学生在RA阅读中遇到的挑战的研究却并不多见。我们开展了一项分为两个周期的行动研究,以考察体裁教学对经济学专业三、四年级本科生RA阅读理解的影响。在第一周期,我们向学生(34 人)介绍了常规章节的移动结构,包括引言、方法、结果、讨论和结论;在第二周期,我们向学生(34 人)介绍了经济学学科特定的移动模型。除了常规章节外,第二周期使用的模型还描述了学科特定章节的修辞结构,如理论模型、计量经济学模型、稳健性和机制。总结性写作和多项选择测试用于衡量学生在阅读理解方面的进步。研究结果表明,第二周期教学显著提高了学生在摘要写作(中等效应大小)和多项选择测试(小效应大小)中的表现,而第一周期教学则没有。此外,与第一周期的学生相比,第二周期的学生较少感受到认知负担过重的挑战。这些研究结果对教授类似学生的 EAP 从业人员很有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing a genre-based research article reading module for undergraduate students
Although research articles (henceforth RA) have been widely used in undergraduate teaching as assigned readings or supplementary teaching materials, studies addressing students' challenges in RA reading are infrequent. We conducted a two-cycle action research to examine the effect of genre instruction on RA reading comprehension of Year 3 and 4 undergraduate students in economics. In Cycle 1, students (n = 34) were introduced to move structures of conventional sections, including Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion; in Cycle 2, students (n = 34) were introduced to a discipline-specific move model of economics. Apart from the conventional sections, the model used in Cycle 2 also describes the rhetorical structure of discipline-specific sections, such as Theoretical Model, Econometric Model, Robustness, and Mechanisms. Summary writing and multiple-choice tests were used to measure students' improvements in reading comprehension. The findings show that Cycle 2 instruction significantly improved students’ performance in summary writing (medium effect size) and multiple-choice tests (small effect size), whereas Cycle 1 instruction did not. Also, fewer students in Cycle 2 perceived cognitive overload challenges than their peers in Cycle 1. The findings can be useful for EAP practitioners teaching similar cohorts of students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of English for Academic Purposes provides a forum for the dissemination of information and views which enables practitioners of and researchers in EAP to keep current with developments in their field and to contribute to its continued updating. JEAP publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges in the linguistic, sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic description of English as it occurs in the contexts of academic study and scholarly exchange itself.
期刊最新文献
Noun phrase complexity in English integrated writing placement test responses Developing advanced citation skills: A mixed-methods approach to corpus technology training for novice researchers Writing a successful applied linguistics conference abstract: The relationship between stylistic and linguistic features and raters’ evaluations From words to senses: A sense-based approach to quantitative polysemy detection across disciplines Developing a genre-based research article reading module for undergraduate students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1