模拟气候和土地利用/土地覆盖变化对埃塞俄比亚南部 Gelana 集水区溪流的预期影响

Alemu Osore Aga, Muse Wldmchel Shomre
{"title":"模拟气候和土地利用/土地覆盖变化对埃塞俄比亚南部 Gelana 集水区溪流的预期影响","authors":"Alemu Osore Aga,&nbsp;Muse Wldmchel Shomre","doi":"10.1016/j.wsee.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective watershed management is extremely critical because changes in the global and local distribution of climate have a direct impact on ecosystems. The primary goal of the current study was to evaluate current and projected climate and land use land cover (LULC) change on streamflow in Gelana catchment. LULC prepared via supervised classification algorithm by using ERDAS (Earth Resources and Development Systems) software, ArcGIS 10.4 (for satellite image processing and map preparation), and the Cellular Automata (CA)-Markov model revealed significant gains in agricultural and built-up over forest and pasture land classes. A coordinated regional climate downscaling experiment under the Africa domain for three regional climate data for two future scenarios (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5) showed a significant reduction in rainfall from 48.64 % to 4.6 %, while minimum and maximum temperatures increased from 0.58 to 3.35 °C and 0.5 to 2.93 °C, respectively. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was applied to analyze the impact of LULC and climate change on streamflow. The model calibration and validation were carried out by using monthly observed streamflow for the most sensitive parameters by using Sequential Uncertainty Fitting (SUFI-2) within the SWAT Calibration of Uncertainty Program (SWAT-CUP). The model performed well between observed and simulated streamflow, with R<sup>2</sup>, NSE, PBIAS, P, and r-factors of 0.84, 0.77, −15.9, 0.68, and 0.56 for calibration and 0.88, 0.8, −14, 0.63, and 0.65 for validation, respectively. The results of the study implied the simulated mean annual streamflow increased from 3.22 % to 23.82 % in the case of LULC change alone, while it decreased from 38.2 % to 23.27 % for climate change alone for the near-term of RCP 4.5 and from 45.3 % to 24.6 % for RCP 8.5. Further substantial decline was observed in the combined simulation, from 55.38 % to 42.45 % and 62.15 % to 59.36 % for the near and far future of RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5, respectively. In order to address the constraints, current findings are valuable to scale up sustainable natural resource management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101280,"journal":{"name":"Watershed Ecology and the Environment","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 195-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling projected impacts of climate and land use/land cover changes on streamflow in Gelana Catchment, Southern Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Alemu Osore Aga,&nbsp;Muse Wldmchel Shomre\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wsee.2024.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Effective watershed management is extremely critical because changes in the global and local distribution of climate have a direct impact on ecosystems. The primary goal of the current study was to evaluate current and projected climate and land use land cover (LULC) change on streamflow in Gelana catchment. LULC prepared via supervised classification algorithm by using ERDAS (Earth Resources and Development Systems) software, ArcGIS 10.4 (for satellite image processing and map preparation), and the Cellular Automata (CA)-Markov model revealed significant gains in agricultural and built-up over forest and pasture land classes. A coordinated regional climate downscaling experiment under the Africa domain for three regional climate data for two future scenarios (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5) showed a significant reduction in rainfall from 48.64 % to 4.6 %, while minimum and maximum temperatures increased from 0.58 to 3.35 °C and 0.5 to 2.93 °C, respectively. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was applied to analyze the impact of LULC and climate change on streamflow. The model calibration and validation were carried out by using monthly observed streamflow for the most sensitive parameters by using Sequential Uncertainty Fitting (SUFI-2) within the SWAT Calibration of Uncertainty Program (SWAT-CUP). The model performed well between observed and simulated streamflow, with R<sup>2</sup>, NSE, PBIAS, P, and r-factors of 0.84, 0.77, −15.9, 0.68, and 0.56 for calibration and 0.88, 0.8, −14, 0.63, and 0.65 for validation, respectively. The results of the study implied the simulated mean annual streamflow increased from 3.22 % to 23.82 % in the case of LULC change alone, while it decreased from 38.2 % to 23.27 % for climate change alone for the near-term of RCP 4.5 and from 45.3 % to 24.6 % for RCP 8.5. Further substantial decline was observed in the combined simulation, from 55.38 % to 42.45 % and 62.15 % to 59.36 % for the near and far future of RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5, respectively. In order to address the constraints, current findings are valuable to scale up sustainable natural resource management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Watershed Ecology and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 195-208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Watershed Ecology and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471424000160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Watershed Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471424000160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的流域管理极其重要,因为全球和地方气候分布的变化会对生态系统产生直接影响。本研究的主要目标是评估当前和预测的气候和土地利用、土地覆盖(LULC)变化对 Gelana 流域溪流的影响。通过使用 ERDAS(地球资源与开发系统)软件、ArcGIS 10.4(用于卫星图像处理和地图绘制)和细胞自动机(CA)-马尔科夫模型,采用监督分类算法编制的 LULC 显示,农业用地和建筑用地的数量明显多于森林和牧场用地。针对两种未来情景(RCP 4.5 和 RCP 8.5)的三个区域气候数据,在非洲域下进行了协调的区域气候降尺度实验,结果显示降雨量从 48.64% 显著减少到 4.6%,而最低气温和最高气温分别从 0.58 ℃ 上升到 3.35 ℃ 和 0.5 ℃ 上升到 2.93 ℃。水土评估工具(SWAT)模型用于分析土地利用、土地利用变化和气候变化对河水流量的影响。利用 SWAT 不确定性校准程序 (SWAT-CUP) 中的序列不确定性拟合 (SUFI-2),对最敏感参数的月度观测流量进行了模型校准和验证。该模型在观测流和模拟流之间表现良好,校准的 R2、NSE、PBIAS、P 和 r 系数分别为 0.84、0.77、-15.9、0.68 和 0.56,验证的 R2、NSE、PBIAS、P 和 r 系数分别为 0.88、0.8、-14、0.63 和 0.65。研究结果表明,仅在土地利用、土地利用变化和气候变化的情况下,模拟的年平均径流量从 3.22% 增加到 23.82%;而在 RCP 4.5 的近期,仅在气候变化的情况下,模拟的年平均径流量从 38.2% 下降到 23.27%;在 RCP 8.5 的情况下,模拟的年平均径流量从 45.3% 下降到 24.6%。在综合模拟中观察到进一步大幅下降,在 RCP 4.5 和 RCP 8.5 的近期和远期,分别从 55.38% 降至 42.45% 和 62.15% 降至 59.36%。为了解决这些制约因素,目前的研究结果对于加强可持续自然资源管理具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling projected impacts of climate and land use/land cover changes on streamflow in Gelana Catchment, Southern Ethiopia
Effective watershed management is extremely critical because changes in the global and local distribution of climate have a direct impact on ecosystems. The primary goal of the current study was to evaluate current and projected climate and land use land cover (LULC) change on streamflow in Gelana catchment. LULC prepared via supervised classification algorithm by using ERDAS (Earth Resources and Development Systems) software, ArcGIS 10.4 (for satellite image processing and map preparation), and the Cellular Automata (CA)-Markov model revealed significant gains in agricultural and built-up over forest and pasture land classes. A coordinated regional climate downscaling experiment under the Africa domain for three regional climate data for two future scenarios (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5) showed a significant reduction in rainfall from 48.64 % to 4.6 %, while minimum and maximum temperatures increased from 0.58 to 3.35 °C and 0.5 to 2.93 °C, respectively. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was applied to analyze the impact of LULC and climate change on streamflow. The model calibration and validation were carried out by using monthly observed streamflow for the most sensitive parameters by using Sequential Uncertainty Fitting (SUFI-2) within the SWAT Calibration of Uncertainty Program (SWAT-CUP). The model performed well between observed and simulated streamflow, with R2, NSE, PBIAS, P, and r-factors of 0.84, 0.77, −15.9, 0.68, and 0.56 for calibration and 0.88, 0.8, −14, 0.63, and 0.65 for validation, respectively. The results of the study implied the simulated mean annual streamflow increased from 3.22 % to 23.82 % in the case of LULC change alone, while it decreased from 38.2 % to 23.27 % for climate change alone for the near-term of RCP 4.5 and from 45.3 % to 24.6 % for RCP 8.5. Further substantial decline was observed in the combined simulation, from 55.38 % to 42.45 % and 62.15 % to 59.36 % for the near and far future of RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5, respectively. In order to address the constraints, current findings are valuable to scale up sustainable natural resource management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simulation of wetland vegetation succession based on coupled Gaussian and population dynamics models: A case study of Poyang Lake wetlands Morphometric analysis of watersheds: A comprehensive review of data sources, quality, and geospatial techniques Flash flood susceptibility mapping of north-east depression of Bangladesh using different GIS based bivariate statistical models Source, fate, toxicity, and remediation of micro-plastic in wetlands: A critical review Effects of Spartina alterniflora control on soil carbon and nitrogen in coastal wetlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1