Kevin Ilo BSc, FRCS , Prith Hallikeri FRCS , Habillan Naathan BMBS , Bernard Van Duren D Phil, FRCS , Mark Higgins FRCS , Iain McNamara MD, FRCS , Toby Smith BSc, MSc, PhD
{"title":"继发性髋关节骨性关节炎患者使用定制股骨柄进行初次全髋关节置换术的疗效:系统回顾","authors":"Kevin Ilo BSc, FRCS , Prith Hallikeri FRCS , Habillan Naathan BMBS , Bernard Van Duren D Phil, FRCS , Mark Higgins FRCS , Iain McNamara MD, FRCS , Toby Smith BSc, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of custom femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with secondary osteoarthritis with abnormal hip anatomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, databases were systematically searched for studies published on primary THA utilizing custom femoral stems. Inclusion criteria were studies on patients with secondary osteoarthritis receiving custom stems, with outcomes including implant survival, revision rates, and functional scores. Data were extracted from eligible studies, with a focus on overall and cause-specific revision rates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 689 studies were screened, 13 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 806 patients and 951 custom THA procedures. The collective follow-up period averaged 11.6 years, with a mean age of 44.6 years. The mean reoperation and revision rates were 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.24-10.13) and 8.25% (95% CI: 4.02-12.47), respectively. The mean intraoperative fracture rate was 3.23% (95% CI: 1.35-5.11), and the mean postoperative leg length discrepancy was 4.25 mm (95% CI: 1.57-6.93). The mean improvement of postoperative Harris Hip Score was 40.32 (range 30-56).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Custom femoral stems in primary THA demonstrate promising results in terms of implant survival and functional outcomes for patients with complex hip anatomy due to secondary osteoarthritis. These findings support the consideration of custom implants as a viable option for this patient demographic, although further research is warranted for long-term outcomes and direct comparisons with standard prostheses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 101504"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Custom Femoral Stems in Patients With Secondary Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Ilo BSc, FRCS , Prith Hallikeri FRCS , Habillan Naathan BMBS , Bernard Van Duren D Phil, FRCS , Mark Higgins FRCS , Iain McNamara MD, FRCS , Toby Smith BSc, MSc, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of custom femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with secondary osteoarthritis with abnormal hip anatomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, databases were systematically searched for studies published on primary THA utilizing custom femoral stems. Inclusion criteria were studies on patients with secondary osteoarthritis receiving custom stems, with outcomes including implant survival, revision rates, and functional scores. Data were extracted from eligible studies, with a focus on overall and cause-specific revision rates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 689 studies were screened, 13 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 806 patients and 951 custom THA procedures. The collective follow-up period averaged 11.6 years, with a mean age of 44.6 years. The mean reoperation and revision rates were 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.24-10.13) and 8.25% (95% CI: 4.02-12.47), respectively. The mean intraoperative fracture rate was 3.23% (95% CI: 1.35-5.11), and the mean postoperative leg length discrepancy was 4.25 mm (95% CI: 1.57-6.93). The mean improvement of postoperative Harris Hip Score was 40.32 (range 30-56).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Custom femoral stems in primary THA demonstrate promising results in terms of implant survival and functional outcomes for patients with complex hip anatomy due to secondary osteoarthritis. These findings support the consideration of custom implants as a viable option for this patient demographic, although further research is warranted for long-term outcomes and direct comparisons with standard prostheses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroplasty Today\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroplasty Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124001894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124001894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Custom Femoral Stems in Patients With Secondary Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review
Background
This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of custom femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with secondary osteoarthritis with abnormal hip anatomy.
Methods
Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, databases were systematically searched for studies published on primary THA utilizing custom femoral stems. Inclusion criteria were studies on patients with secondary osteoarthritis receiving custom stems, with outcomes including implant survival, revision rates, and functional scores. Data were extracted from eligible studies, with a focus on overall and cause-specific revision rates.
Results
A total of 689 studies were screened, 13 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 806 patients and 951 custom THA procedures. The collective follow-up period averaged 11.6 years, with a mean age of 44.6 years. The mean reoperation and revision rates were 6.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.24-10.13) and 8.25% (95% CI: 4.02-12.47), respectively. The mean intraoperative fracture rate was 3.23% (95% CI: 1.35-5.11), and the mean postoperative leg length discrepancy was 4.25 mm (95% CI: 1.57-6.93). The mean improvement of postoperative Harris Hip Score was 40.32 (range 30-56).
Conclusions
Custom femoral stems in primary THA demonstrate promising results in terms of implant survival and functional outcomes for patients with complex hip anatomy due to secondary osteoarthritis. These findings support the consideration of custom implants as a viable option for this patient demographic, although further research is warranted for long-term outcomes and direct comparisons with standard prostheses.
期刊介绍:
Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.