数字经济的神话:数字经济能否持续促进低碳地位和可持续发展?

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107688
Zihao Ma, Pingdan Zhang
{"title":"数字经济的神话:数字经济能否持续促进低碳地位和可持续发展?","authors":"Zihao Ma,&nbsp;Pingdan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Facing global warming and looming catastrophic climate change, many countries have launched actions to change themselves and their societies to attain a low-carbon status. Digital economy purportedly offers a potential way to achieve sustainable development. However, this is still debated and a consensus is elusive. Here, we propose a novel nonlinear d curve hypothesis to describe the relationship between the digital economy and carbon emissions, whereby the digital economy can no longer contribute to carbon abatement once it is overdeveloped because of a rebound in energy consumption (i.e., the overdevelopment trap). To test this hypothesis, we used county-level panel data from China and conducted an empirical analysis with expanded STIRPAT models. Through a suite of robustness tests, we find evidence supporting our hypothesis, in that nearly 30 % of our samples (<em>N</em> = 1450 counties) had stepped into the overdevelopment trap, with this problem being most severe in eastern China. Altogether, we believe those countries relying heavily on thermal power—and more likely to suffer from a rebound in fossil energy consumption—should take a more cautious attitude towards implementing their digital economy and consider other ways to meet their carbon abatement goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107688"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myth of the digital economy: Can it continually contribute to a low-carbon status and sustainable development?\",\"authors\":\"Zihao Ma,&nbsp;Pingdan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Facing global warming and looming catastrophic climate change, many countries have launched actions to change themselves and their societies to attain a low-carbon status. Digital economy purportedly offers a potential way to achieve sustainable development. However, this is still debated and a consensus is elusive. Here, we propose a novel nonlinear d curve hypothesis to describe the relationship between the digital economy and carbon emissions, whereby the digital economy can no longer contribute to carbon abatement once it is overdeveloped because of a rebound in energy consumption (i.e., the overdevelopment trap). To test this hypothesis, we used county-level panel data from China and conducted an empirical analysis with expanded STIRPAT models. Through a suite of robustness tests, we find evidence supporting our hypothesis, in that nearly 30 % of our samples (<em>N</em> = 1450 counties) had stepped into the overdevelopment trap, with this problem being most severe in eastern China. Altogether, we believe those countries relying heavily on thermal power—and more likely to suffer from a rebound in fossil energy consumption—should take a more cautious attitude towards implementing their digital economy and consider other ways to meet their carbon abatement goals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"110 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002750\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002750","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面对全球变暖和迫在眉睫的灾难性气候变化,许多国家已开始采取行动改变自身和社会,以实现低碳状态。据称,数字经济为实现可持续发展提供了一条潜在的途径。然而,人们对此仍然争论不休,难以达成共识。在此,我们提出了一个新颖的非线性 d 曲线假说来描述数字经济与碳排放之间的关系,即数字经济一旦过度发展,由于能源消耗的反弹(即过度发展陷阱),就不能再为碳减排做出贡献。为了验证这一假设,我们使用了中国的县级面板数据,并利用扩展的 STIRPAT 模型进行了实证分析。通过一系列稳健性检验,我们发现有证据支持我们的假设,即近 30% 的样本(N = 1450 个县)已步入过度发展陷阱,这一问题在中国东部最为严重。总之,我们认为,那些严重依赖火力发电的国家--也就是更有可能因化石能源消耗反弹而遭受损失的国家--在实施数字经济时应采取更加谨慎的态度,并考虑以其他方式实现碳减排目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Myth of the digital economy: Can it continually contribute to a low-carbon status and sustainable development?
Facing global warming and looming catastrophic climate change, many countries have launched actions to change themselves and their societies to attain a low-carbon status. Digital economy purportedly offers a potential way to achieve sustainable development. However, this is still debated and a consensus is elusive. Here, we propose a novel nonlinear d curve hypothesis to describe the relationship between the digital economy and carbon emissions, whereby the digital economy can no longer contribute to carbon abatement once it is overdeveloped because of a rebound in energy consumption (i.e., the overdevelopment trap). To test this hypothesis, we used county-level panel data from China and conducted an empirical analysis with expanded STIRPAT models. Through a suite of robustness tests, we find evidence supporting our hypothesis, in that nearly 30 % of our samples (N = 1450 counties) had stepped into the overdevelopment trap, with this problem being most severe in eastern China. Altogether, we believe those countries relying heavily on thermal power—and more likely to suffer from a rebound in fossil energy consumption—should take a more cautious attitude towards implementing their digital economy and consider other ways to meet their carbon abatement goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1