消费者对算法的认知和对供应商的信任是否会影响人工智能应用的结构保证?

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Telematics and Informatics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2024.102188
Yun-Peng Yuan , Li Liu , Garry Wei-Han Tan , Keng-Boon Ooi
{"title":"消费者对算法的认知和对供应商的信任是否会影响人工智能应用的结构保证?","authors":"Yun-Peng Yuan ,&nbsp;Li Liu ,&nbsp;Garry Wei-Han Tan ,&nbsp;Keng-Boon Ooi","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2024.102188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to understand how perceptions of algorithms and trusting beliefs in service providers facilitate consumers’ perceived structural assurance of using commercial AI applications. The present study adopts a combined approach of partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (PLS-SEM-fsQCA) to understand the linear and combined effects of the studied factors on perceived structural assurance with 297 effective responses. The PLS-SEM findings revealed that algorithmic perceptions (i.e., Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency) and trusting beliefs (i.e., Benevolence, Competence, and Integrity) were positively associated with Perceived Structural Assurance. The fsQCA findings indicate four configural solutions of causal conditions that explain Perceived Structural Assurance, and each solution reflects a particular type of consumers who have unique considerations when assessing commercial AI’s structural assurance. This study adds to consumer behavior studies by introducing consumers’ perceptions of algorithms and trusting beliefs in evaluating their structural assurances in commercial AI applications from linear and complexity perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102188"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do consumers’ perceptions of algorithms and trusting beliefs in providers affect perceived structural assurances of AI-powered applications?\",\"authors\":\"Yun-Peng Yuan ,&nbsp;Li Liu ,&nbsp;Garry Wei-Han Tan ,&nbsp;Keng-Boon Ooi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tele.2024.102188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aims to understand how perceptions of algorithms and trusting beliefs in service providers facilitate consumers’ perceived structural assurance of using commercial AI applications. The present study adopts a combined approach of partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (PLS-SEM-fsQCA) to understand the linear and combined effects of the studied factors on perceived structural assurance with 297 effective responses. The PLS-SEM findings revealed that algorithmic perceptions (i.e., Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency) and trusting beliefs (i.e., Benevolence, Competence, and Integrity) were positively associated with Perceived Structural Assurance. The fsQCA findings indicate four configural solutions of causal conditions that explain Perceived Structural Assurance, and each solution reflects a particular type of consumers who have unique considerations when assessing commercial AI’s structural assurance. This study adds to consumer behavior studies by introducing consumers’ perceptions of algorithms and trusting beliefs in evaluating their structural assurances in commercial AI applications from linear and complexity perspectives.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585324000923\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585324000923","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在了解对算法的感知和对服务提供商的信任信念如何促进消费者在使用商业人工智能应用时感知到的结构保证。本研究采用偏最小二乘法-结构方程建模和模糊集定性比较分析(PLS-SEM-fsQCA)相结合的方法,通过297个有效回答来了解所研究因素对感知结构保证的线性和综合影响。PLS-SEM 分析结果显示,算法感知(即公平性、责任性和透明度)和信任信念(即仁慈、能力和诚信)与感知结构保证呈正相关。fsQCA 的研究结果表明,有四种因果条件配置方案可以解释感知结构保证,每种方案都反映了特定类型的消费者,他们在评估商业人工智能的结构保证时有独特的考虑因素。本研究从线性和复杂性角度介绍了消费者在评估商业人工智能应用的结构保证时对算法的感知和信任信念,为消费者行为研究增添了新的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do consumers’ perceptions of algorithms and trusting beliefs in providers affect perceived structural assurances of AI-powered applications?
This study aims to understand how perceptions of algorithms and trusting beliefs in service providers facilitate consumers’ perceived structural assurance of using commercial AI applications. The present study adopts a combined approach of partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (PLS-SEM-fsQCA) to understand the linear and combined effects of the studied factors on perceived structural assurance with 297 effective responses. The PLS-SEM findings revealed that algorithmic perceptions (i.e., Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency) and trusting beliefs (i.e., Benevolence, Competence, and Integrity) were positively associated with Perceived Structural Assurance. The fsQCA findings indicate four configural solutions of causal conditions that explain Perceived Structural Assurance, and each solution reflects a particular type of consumers who have unique considerations when assessing commercial AI’s structural assurance. This study adds to consumer behavior studies by introducing consumers’ perceptions of algorithms and trusting beliefs in evaluating their structural assurances in commercial AI applications from linear and complexity perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the dynamics of binge-scrolling: A comprehensive analysis of short-form video consumption using a Stimulus-Organism-Response model Motivations behind problematic short video use: A three-level meta-analysis Crypto-Cognitive Exploitation: Integrating Cognitive, Social, and Technological perspectives on cryptocurrency fraud Are you what you emoji? How skin tone emojis and profile pictures shape attention and social inference processing Engaging with underserved communities during times of crises: A computational analysis of social media interactions with government information about COVID-19 economic relief programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1