创新生态系统中的社会认知视角:了解工业 4.0 时代初创企业从构思到整合的整个过程

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123592
Dalton Alexandre Kai , Edson Pinheiro de Lima , Guilherme Brittes Benitez
{"title":"创新生态系统中的社会认知视角:了解工业 4.0 时代初创企业从构思到整合的整个过程","authors":"Dalton Alexandre Kai ,&nbsp;Edson Pinheiro de Lima ,&nbsp;Guilherme Brittes Benitez","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research explores how startups oriented to Industry 4.0 mature their concepts, products, and business across evolutionary lifecycles in the innovation ecosystem. We examine how startups mature their business by through four lifecycle stages: Ideation, MVP, Traction, and Consolidation, by collaborating with other actors in the innovation ecosystem. We adopt a social cognitive perspective using its four core properties: intentionally, forethought, self-reactiveness, and self-reflectiveness to explain how startups acquire knowledge to become self-effective in mastering skills and competencies required to develop their solutions. We employ a qualitative and longitudinal case study spanning five years within an innovation ecosystem, including more than 30 follow-up sessions, 27 semi-structured interviews, and a survey with 120 startups. Our findings reveal that startups in their initial stages exhibit more open, transparent, and exploratory behavior towards ecosystem actors. As they evolve, they become more specific and formal throughout their lifecycle, interacting, co-creating, and adding value among various groups or stakeholders, ultimately reaching a multi-sided platform governance structure. We also present a framework illustrating how startups typically relate to other ecosystem actors to mature their businesses. Our results can help entrepreneurs overcome the stages of a startup's lifecycle and achieve consolidation in the market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 123592"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A social cognitive perspective in innovation ecosystems: Understanding startups from ideation to consolidation in industry 4.0 era\",\"authors\":\"Dalton Alexandre Kai ,&nbsp;Edson Pinheiro de Lima ,&nbsp;Guilherme Brittes Benitez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This research explores how startups oriented to Industry 4.0 mature their concepts, products, and business across evolutionary lifecycles in the innovation ecosystem. We examine how startups mature their business by through four lifecycle stages: Ideation, MVP, Traction, and Consolidation, by collaborating with other actors in the innovation ecosystem. We adopt a social cognitive perspective using its four core properties: intentionally, forethought, self-reactiveness, and self-reflectiveness to explain how startups acquire knowledge to become self-effective in mastering skills and competencies required to develop their solutions. We employ a qualitative and longitudinal case study spanning five years within an innovation ecosystem, including more than 30 follow-up sessions, 27 semi-structured interviews, and a survey with 120 startups. Our findings reveal that startups in their initial stages exhibit more open, transparent, and exploratory behavior towards ecosystem actors. As they evolve, they become more specific and formal throughout their lifecycle, interacting, co-creating, and adding value among various groups or stakeholders, ultimately reaching a multi-sided platform governance structure. We also present a framework illustrating how startups typically relate to other ecosystem actors to mature their businesses. Our results can help entrepreneurs overcome the stages of a startup's lifecycle and achieve consolidation in the market.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524003901\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524003901","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了面向工业 4.0 的初创企业如何在创新生态系统的演化生命周期中使其概念、产品和业务成熟起来。我们研究初创企业如何通过四个生命周期阶段使其业务成熟:我们研究了初创企业如何通过与创新生态系统中的其他参与者合作,在构思、MVP、牵引和巩固四个生命周期阶段中实现业务成熟。我们采用社会认知的视角,利用其四个核心属性:有意、深思熟虑、自我反应和自我反思,来解释初创企业如何获取知识,从而在掌握开发解决方案所需的技能和能力方面实现自我高效。我们在一个创新生态系统中开展了一项为期五年的纵向定性案例研究,其中包括 30 多次后续会议、27 次半结构化访谈以及对 120 家初创企业的调查。我们的研究结果表明,初创企业在初始阶段对生态系统参与者表现出更加开放、透明和探索性的行为。随着发展,它们在整个生命周期中变得更加具体和正式,在不同群体或利益相关者之间进行互动、共同创造和增值,最终形成多方平台治理结构。我们还提出了一个框架,说明初创企业通常如何与其他生态系统参与者建立联系,使其业务走向成熟。我们的研究成果可以帮助创业者克服初创企业生命周期的各个阶段,实现市场整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A social cognitive perspective in innovation ecosystems: Understanding startups from ideation to consolidation in industry 4.0 era
This research explores how startups oriented to Industry 4.0 mature their concepts, products, and business across evolutionary lifecycles in the innovation ecosystem. We examine how startups mature their business by through four lifecycle stages: Ideation, MVP, Traction, and Consolidation, by collaborating with other actors in the innovation ecosystem. We adopt a social cognitive perspective using its four core properties: intentionally, forethought, self-reactiveness, and self-reflectiveness to explain how startups acquire knowledge to become self-effective in mastering skills and competencies required to develop their solutions. We employ a qualitative and longitudinal case study spanning five years within an innovation ecosystem, including more than 30 follow-up sessions, 27 semi-structured interviews, and a survey with 120 startups. Our findings reveal that startups in their initial stages exhibit more open, transparent, and exploratory behavior towards ecosystem actors. As they evolve, they become more specific and formal throughout their lifecycle, interacting, co-creating, and adding value among various groups or stakeholders, ultimately reaching a multi-sided platform governance structure. We also present a framework illustrating how startups typically relate to other ecosystem actors to mature their businesses. Our results can help entrepreneurs overcome the stages of a startup's lifecycle and achieve consolidation in the market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
Roles of related and unrelated external technologies in shaping regional breakthrough technological advantages Standardization and Standards: Safeguards of Technological Sovereignty? Understanding service robot adoption and resistance from a service provider perspective Examining trust in cryptocurrency investment: Insights from the structural equation modeling Enabling a viable circular ecosystem for electric vehicle batteries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1