评估主动交通和电动交通的货币价值:系统回顾

Lauren Del Rosario , Hao Wu , Jinwoo (Brian) Lee , Lee Roberts , Tony Arnold , Sandeep Mathur , Christopher Pettit
{"title":"评估主动交通和电动交通的货币价值:系统回顾","authors":"Lauren Del Rosario ,&nbsp;Hao Wu ,&nbsp;Jinwoo (Brian) Lee ,&nbsp;Lee Roberts ,&nbsp;Tony Arnold ,&nbsp;Sandeep Mathur ,&nbsp;Christopher Pettit","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Costs/benefits research to support active transport/electric micromobility investments are needed for optimal investment of public funds. This systematic review provides an evidence base of the economic effects of active transport and electric micromobility modes. Previous reviews including non-health benefits of active transport have been limited to Europe. Twenty-three studies from both the academic and grey literature were included in the review. Values for walking ranged from USD −0.25 ∼ 4.25/km, values for cycling ranged from USD −1.00 ∼ 1.95/km, and values for e-bike and e-scooter ranged from USD −0.44 ∼ 1.15/km. The largest benefit for active transport was due to health parameters. There were large variations in monetised benefits; some studies incorporated only certain types of benefits. Research gaps included inconsistent evidence for assumptions and a lack of data especially for electric micromobility modes. The quality of grey literature also varied.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 101243"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the monetary value of active transport and e-micromobility: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Del Rosario ,&nbsp;Hao Wu ,&nbsp;Jinwoo (Brian) Lee ,&nbsp;Lee Roberts ,&nbsp;Tony Arnold ,&nbsp;Sandeep Mathur ,&nbsp;Christopher Pettit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Costs/benefits research to support active transport/electric micromobility investments are needed for optimal investment of public funds. This systematic review provides an evidence base of the economic effects of active transport and electric micromobility modes. Previous reviews including non-health benefits of active transport have been limited to Europe. Twenty-three studies from both the academic and grey literature were included in the review. Values for walking ranged from USD −0.25 ∼ 4.25/km, values for cycling ranged from USD −1.00 ∼ 1.95/km, and values for e-bike and e-scooter ranged from USD −0.44 ∼ 1.15/km. The largest benefit for active transport was due to health parameters. There were large variations in monetised benefits; some studies incorporated only certain types of benefits. Research gaps included inconsistent evidence for assumptions and a lack of data especially for electric micromobility modes. The quality of grey literature also varied.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259019822400229X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259019822400229X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了优化公共资金的投资,需要对支持主动交通/电动微型交通投资的成本/效益进行研究。本系统性综述为主动交通和电动微型交通模式的经济效应提供了证据基础。以往包括主动交通的非健康效益的综述仅限于欧洲。本综述包括 23 项学术研究和灰色文献。步行的效益值为-0.25 美元 ∼ 4.25 美元/公里,骑自行车的效益值为-1.00 美元 ∼ 1.95 美元/公里,电动自行车和电动摩托车的效益值为-0.44 美元 ∼ 1.15 美元/公里。积极交通的最大收益来自健康参数。货币化效益存在很大差异;一些研究仅纳入了某些类型的效益。研究差距包括假设的证据不一致,以及缺乏数据,尤其是电动微型交通模式的数据。灰色文献的质量也参差不齐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the monetary value of active transport and e-micromobility: A systematic review
Costs/benefits research to support active transport/electric micromobility investments are needed for optimal investment of public funds. This systematic review provides an evidence base of the economic effects of active transport and electric micromobility modes. Previous reviews including non-health benefits of active transport have been limited to Europe. Twenty-three studies from both the academic and grey literature were included in the review. Values for walking ranged from USD −0.25 ∼ 4.25/km, values for cycling ranged from USD −1.00 ∼ 1.95/km, and values for e-bike and e-scooter ranged from USD −0.44 ∼ 1.15/km. The largest benefit for active transport was due to health parameters. There were large variations in monetised benefits; some studies incorporated only certain types of benefits. Research gaps included inconsistent evidence for assumptions and a lack of data especially for electric micromobility modes. The quality of grey literature also varied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Electric mobility investment in the power and transport sector coupling context: Lessons from Argentina, the Philippines, Poland and Romania Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand Disparities in ridehailing travel times for accessing non-work destinations Optimal bus reassignment considering in-vehicle overcrowding Drones for automated parcel delivery: Use case identification and derivation of technical requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1