利用深度学习对ERA5中的极端热带气旋降雨量进行降尺度、纠偏和空间调整

IF 6.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Weather and Climate Extremes Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1016/j.wace.2024.100724
Guido Ascenso , Andrea Ficchì , Matteo Giuliani , Enrico Scoccimarro , Andrea Castelletti
{"title":"利用深度学习对ERA5中的极端热带气旋降雨量进行降尺度、纠偏和空间调整","authors":"Guido Ascenso ,&nbsp;Andrea Ficchì ,&nbsp;Matteo Giuliani ,&nbsp;Enrico Scoccimarro ,&nbsp;Andrea Castelletti","doi":"10.1016/j.wace.2024.100724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydrological models that are used to analyse flood risk induced by tropical cyclones often input ERA5 reanalysis data. However, ERA5 precipitation has large systematic biases, especially over heavy precipitation events like Tropical Cyclones, compromising its usefulness in such scenarios. Few studies to date have performed bias correction of ERA5 precipitation and none of them for extreme rainfall induced by tropical cyclones. Additionally, most existing works on bias adjustment focus on adjusting pixel-wise metrics of bias, such as the Mean Squared Error (MSE). However, it is equally important to ensure that the rainfall peaks are correctly located within the rainfall maps, especially if these maps are then used as input to hydrological models. In this paper, we describe a novel machine learning model that addresses both gaps, RA-U<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>p</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, based on the popular U-Net model. The key novelty of RA-U<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>p</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> is its loss function, the <em>compound loss</em>, which optimizes both a pixel-wise bias metric (the MSE) and a spatial verification metric (a modified version of the Fractions Skill Score). Our results show how RA-U<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>p</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> improves ERA5 in almost all metrics by 3-28%—more than the other models we used for comparison which actually worsen the total rainfall bias of ERA5—at the cost of a slightly increased (3%) error on the magnitude of the peak. We analyse the behaviour of RA-U<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>p</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> by visualizing accumulated maps of four particularly wet tropical cyclones and by dividing our data according to the Saffir-Simpson scale and to whether they made landfall, and we perform an error analysis to understand under what conditions our model performs best.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48630,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Climate Extremes","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100724"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Downscaling, bias correction, and spatial adjustment of extreme tropical cyclone rainfall in ERA5 using deep learning\",\"authors\":\"Guido Ascenso ,&nbsp;Andrea Ficchì ,&nbsp;Matteo Giuliani ,&nbsp;Enrico Scoccimarro ,&nbsp;Andrea Castelletti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wace.2024.100724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Hydrological models that are used to analyse flood risk induced by tropical cyclones often input ERA5 reanalysis data. However, ERA5 precipitation has large systematic biases, especially over heavy precipitation events like Tropical Cyclones, compromising its usefulness in such scenarios. Few studies to date have performed bias correction of ERA5 precipitation and none of them for extreme rainfall induced by tropical cyclones. Additionally, most existing works on bias adjustment focus on adjusting pixel-wise metrics of bias, such as the Mean Squared Error (MSE). However, it is equally important to ensure that the rainfall peaks are correctly located within the rainfall maps, especially if these maps are then used as input to hydrological models. In this paper, we describe a novel machine learning model that addresses both gaps, RA-U<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>p</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, based on the popular U-Net model. The key novelty of RA-U<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>p</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> is its loss function, the <em>compound loss</em>, which optimizes both a pixel-wise bias metric (the MSE) and a spatial verification metric (a modified version of the Fractions Skill Score). Our results show how RA-U<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>p</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> improves ERA5 in almost all metrics by 3-28%—more than the other models we used for comparison which actually worsen the total rainfall bias of ERA5—at the cost of a slightly increased (3%) error on the magnitude of the peak. We analyse the behaviour of RA-U<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi><mi>p</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> by visualizing accumulated maps of four particularly wet tropical cyclones and by dividing our data according to the Saffir-Simpson scale and to whether they made landfall, and we perform an error analysis to understand under what conditions our model performs best.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weather and Climate Extremes\",\"volume\":\"46 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weather and Climate Extremes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094724000859\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Climate Extremes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094724000859","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于分析热带气旋引发的洪水风险的水文模型通常输入ERA5再分析数据。然而,ERA5 降水量存在较大的系统偏差,尤其是在热带气旋等强降水事件中,这影响了其在此类情景中的实用性。迄今为止,对ERA5 降水量进行偏差修正的研究很少,而且没有一项研究是针对热带气旋引起的极端降雨的。此外,大多数现有的偏差调整工作都侧重于调整像素偏差指标,如平均平方误差(MSE)。然而,确保降雨峰值在降雨地图中的正确定位同样重要,尤其是当这些地图被用作水文模型的输入时。在本文中,我们介绍了一种新型机器学习模型 RA-Ucmpd,该模型基于流行的 U-Net 模型,可同时解决这两个问题。RA-Ucmpd 的主要创新点在于其损失函数--复合损失,它同时优化了像素偏差指标(MSE)和空间验证指标(分数技能得分的改进版)。我们的结果表明 RA-Ucmpd 在几乎所有指标上都比 ERA5 提高了 3-28%,超过了我们用于比较的其他模型,后者实际上恶化了 ERA5 的总降雨量偏差,但代价是峰值大小误差略有增加(3%)。我们分析了 RA-Ucmpd 的行为,方法是直观显示四个特别潮湿的热带气旋的累积图,并根据萨菲尔-辛普森尺度和是否登陆对数据进行划分,我们还进行了误差分析,以了解我们的模型在什么条件下表现最佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Downscaling, bias correction, and spatial adjustment of extreme tropical cyclone rainfall in ERA5 using deep learning
Hydrological models that are used to analyse flood risk induced by tropical cyclones often input ERA5 reanalysis data. However, ERA5 precipitation has large systematic biases, especially over heavy precipitation events like Tropical Cyclones, compromising its usefulness in such scenarios. Few studies to date have performed bias correction of ERA5 precipitation and none of them for extreme rainfall induced by tropical cyclones. Additionally, most existing works on bias adjustment focus on adjusting pixel-wise metrics of bias, such as the Mean Squared Error (MSE). However, it is equally important to ensure that the rainfall peaks are correctly located within the rainfall maps, especially if these maps are then used as input to hydrological models. In this paper, we describe a novel machine learning model that addresses both gaps, RA-Ucmpd, based on the popular U-Net model. The key novelty of RA-Ucmpd is its loss function, the compound loss, which optimizes both a pixel-wise bias metric (the MSE) and a spatial verification metric (a modified version of the Fractions Skill Score). Our results show how RA-Ucmpd improves ERA5 in almost all metrics by 3-28%—more than the other models we used for comparison which actually worsen the total rainfall bias of ERA5—at the cost of a slightly increased (3%) error on the magnitude of the peak. We analyse the behaviour of RA-Ucmpd by visualizing accumulated maps of four particularly wet tropical cyclones and by dividing our data according to the Saffir-Simpson scale and to whether they made landfall, and we perform an error analysis to understand under what conditions our model performs best.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Weather and Climate Extremes
Weather and Climate Extremes Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
102
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Weather and Climate Extremes Target Audience: Academics Decision makers International development agencies Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) Civil society Focus Areas: Research in weather and climate extremes Monitoring and early warning systems Assessment of vulnerability and impacts Developing and implementing intervention policies Effective risk management and adaptation practices Engagement of local communities in adopting coping strategies Information and communication strategies tailored to local and regional needs and circumstances
期刊最新文献
Triggers of inland heavy rainfall inducing convective storms in West Africa : Case study of June, 2021 Spatiotemporal variation of intra-urban heat and heatwaves across Greater Sydney, Australia Projecting impacts of extreme weather events on crop yields using LASSO regression Moisture sources for the unprecedented precipitation event in the heart of Taklimakan desert China is suffering from fewer but more severe drought to flood abrupt alternation events
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1