喷射压力和废气再循环对以微藻类生物柴油为燃料的 VCR 发动机的影响

IF 2.8 Q2 THERMODYNAMICS Heat Transfer Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1002/htj.23075
S. D. Galande, D. R. Pangavhane, K. B. Deshmukh
{"title":"喷射压力和废气再循环对以微藻类生物柴油为燃料的 VCR 发动机的影响","authors":"S. D. Galande,&nbsp;D. R. Pangavhane,&nbsp;K. B. Deshmukh","doi":"10.1002/htj.23075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biodiesel has been chosen as a decent alternative to diesel in the context of establishing environmentally pleasant conditions and saving petroleum-based resources for future generations. It is well-established that biodiesel-powered diesel engines may achieve outcomes equivalent to those of diesel engines. The current investigation was conducted to study the effect of injection pressure (190, 210, and 230 bar) and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) (5%, 10%, and 15%) on a single-cylinder variable compression ratio (VCR) diesel engine running using a B20 (20% MB + 80% PD) blend of microalgae biodiesel (MABD). This experiment was conducted in two stages. During the first stage of experimentation, the efficiency and emission characteristics of a diesel engine with a B20 blend of MABD at various fuel injection pressures and fresh air were investigated. During the second phase, fresh air was mixed with 5%, 10%, and 15% exhaust gases, and the experiment was conducted. It was discovered that increasing injection pressure to 230 bar provided considerable improvements. Brake thermal efficiency increased by 2.35%, brake-specific fuel consumption decreased by 3.57% and pollutants such as carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon, and smoke were reduced by more than 50% compared to conventional diesel. These reductions were similarly significant (over 22%) as compared to the B20 blend at lower injection pressure (210 bar). However, there was a slight trade-off: nitrogen oxide (NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>) emissions increased partially (3.14%), while exhaust gas temperature (EGT) increased by 1.72% at a higher pressure. The study then investigated the influence of EGR (5%, 10%, and 15%) at various injection pressures. The optimal value seems to be 10% EGR at 230 bar injection pressure. This combination substantially reduced NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions (by over 41% compared to the normal B20 blend) and EGT (by more than 8%), while having no notable effect on other performance or emission variables. Overall, the results show that employing a B20 MABD blend with high injection pressure (230 bar) and moderate EGR (10%) improves engine performance while reducing hazardous emissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":44939,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer","volume":"53 7","pages":"3341-3358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of injection pressure and exhaust gas recirculation on a VCR engine fueled by microalgae biodiesel\",\"authors\":\"S. D. Galande,&nbsp;D. R. Pangavhane,&nbsp;K. B. Deshmukh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/htj.23075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Biodiesel has been chosen as a decent alternative to diesel in the context of establishing environmentally pleasant conditions and saving petroleum-based resources for future generations. It is well-established that biodiesel-powered diesel engines may achieve outcomes equivalent to those of diesel engines. The current investigation was conducted to study the effect of injection pressure (190, 210, and 230 bar) and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) (5%, 10%, and 15%) on a single-cylinder variable compression ratio (VCR) diesel engine running using a B20 (20% MB + 80% PD) blend of microalgae biodiesel (MABD). This experiment was conducted in two stages. During the first stage of experimentation, the efficiency and emission characteristics of a diesel engine with a B20 blend of MABD at various fuel injection pressures and fresh air were investigated. During the second phase, fresh air was mixed with 5%, 10%, and 15% exhaust gases, and the experiment was conducted. It was discovered that increasing injection pressure to 230 bar provided considerable improvements. Brake thermal efficiency increased by 2.35%, brake-specific fuel consumption decreased by 3.57% and pollutants such as carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon, and smoke were reduced by more than 50% compared to conventional diesel. These reductions were similarly significant (over 22%) as compared to the B20 blend at lower injection pressure (210 bar). However, there was a slight trade-off: nitrogen oxide (NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>) emissions increased partially (3.14%), while exhaust gas temperature (EGT) increased by 1.72% at a higher pressure. The study then investigated the influence of EGR (5%, 10%, and 15%) at various injection pressures. The optimal value seems to be 10% EGR at 230 bar injection pressure. This combination substantially reduced NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions (by over 41% compared to the normal B20 blend) and EGT (by more than 8%), while having no notable effect on other performance or emission variables. Overall, the results show that employing a B20 MABD blend with high injection pressure (230 bar) and moderate EGR (10%) improves engine performance while reducing hazardous emissions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heat Transfer\",\"volume\":\"53 7\",\"pages\":\"3341-3358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heat Transfer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/htj.23075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"THERMODYNAMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/htj.23075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物柴油被选为柴油的理想替代品,其目的是为子孙后代创造良好的环境条件和节约石油资源。以生物柴油为动力的柴油发动机可以达到与柴油发动机同等的效果,这一点已经得到证实。目前的调查旨在研究喷射压力(190、210 和 230 巴)和废气再循环(EGR)(5%、10% 和 15%)对使用 B20(20% MB + 80% PD)微藻生物柴油(MABD)混合燃料的单缸可变压缩比(VCR)柴油发动机的影响。该实验分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段实验中,研究了柴油发动机在不同燃油喷射压力和新鲜空气条件下使用 B20 混合微藻生物柴油的效率和排放特性。在第二阶段,新鲜空气与 5% 、10% 和 15% 的废气混合后进行实验。实验发现,将喷射压力提高到 230 巴后,情况有了明显改善。与传统柴油相比,制动热效率提高了 2.35%,制动油耗降低了 3.57%,一氧化碳 (CO)、碳氢化合物和烟雾等污染物减少了 50%以上。与喷射压力较低(210 巴)的 B20 混合燃料相比,这些降低同样显著(超过 22%)。不过,也有一些小的折衷:氮氧化物(NOx)排放量部分增加(3.14%),而废气温度(EGT)在较高压力下增加了 1.72%。研究随后调查了不同喷射压力下 EGR(5%、10% 和 15%)的影响。最佳值似乎是在 230 巴喷射压力下的 10%EGR。这种组合大大降低了氮氧化物排放量(与普通 B20 混合燃料相比降低了 41% 以上)和 EGT(降低了 8% 以上),同时对其他性能或排放变量没有明显影响。总之,研究结果表明,采用高喷射压力(230 巴)和适度 EGR(10%)的 B20 MABD 混合燃料可提高发动机性能,同时减少有害气体排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The influence of injection pressure and exhaust gas recirculation on a VCR engine fueled by microalgae biodiesel

Biodiesel has been chosen as a decent alternative to diesel in the context of establishing environmentally pleasant conditions and saving petroleum-based resources for future generations. It is well-established that biodiesel-powered diesel engines may achieve outcomes equivalent to those of diesel engines. The current investigation was conducted to study the effect of injection pressure (190, 210, and 230 bar) and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) (5%, 10%, and 15%) on a single-cylinder variable compression ratio (VCR) diesel engine running using a B20 (20% MB + 80% PD) blend of microalgae biodiesel (MABD). This experiment was conducted in two stages. During the first stage of experimentation, the efficiency and emission characteristics of a diesel engine with a B20 blend of MABD at various fuel injection pressures and fresh air were investigated. During the second phase, fresh air was mixed with 5%, 10%, and 15% exhaust gases, and the experiment was conducted. It was discovered that increasing injection pressure to 230 bar provided considerable improvements. Brake thermal efficiency increased by 2.35%, brake-specific fuel consumption decreased by 3.57% and pollutants such as carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon, and smoke were reduced by more than 50% compared to conventional diesel. These reductions were similarly significant (over 22%) as compared to the B20 blend at lower injection pressure (210 bar). However, there was a slight trade-off: nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions increased partially (3.14%), while exhaust gas temperature (EGT) increased by 1.72% at a higher pressure. The study then investigated the influence of EGR (5%, 10%, and 15%) at various injection pressures. The optimal value seems to be 10% EGR at 230 bar injection pressure. This combination substantially reduced NOx emissions (by over 41% compared to the normal B20 blend) and EGT (by more than 8%), while having no notable effect on other performance or emission variables. Overall, the results show that employing a B20 MABD blend with high injection pressure (230 bar) and moderate EGR (10%) improves engine performance while reducing hazardous emissions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer THERMODYNAMICS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
19.40%
发文量
342
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Optimizing heat transfer in solar air heater ducts through staggered arrangement of discrete V-ribs Experimental investigation on an innovative serpentine channel-based nanofluid cooling technology for modular lithium-ion battery thermal management Utilizing multilayer perceptron for machine learning diagnosis in phase change material-based thermal management systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1