胸部 X 射线人工智能分诊系统的真实世界评估:前瞻性临床研究

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111783
Srinath Sridharan , Alicia Seah Xin Hui , Narayan Venkataraman , Prasanna Sivanath Tirukonda , Ram Pratab Jeyaratnam , Sindhu John , Saraswathy Suresh Babu , Perry Liew , Joe Francis , Tsai Koh Tzan , Wong Kang Min , Goh Min Liong , Charlene Liew Jin Yee
{"title":"胸部 X 射线人工智能分诊系统的真实世界评估:前瞻性临床研究","authors":"Srinath Sridharan ,&nbsp;Alicia Seah Xin Hui ,&nbsp;Narayan Venkataraman ,&nbsp;Prasanna Sivanath Tirukonda ,&nbsp;Ram Pratab Jeyaratnam ,&nbsp;Sindhu John ,&nbsp;Saraswathy Suresh Babu ,&nbsp;Perry Liew ,&nbsp;Joe Francis ,&nbsp;Tsai Koh Tzan ,&nbsp;Wong Kang Min ,&nbsp;Goh Min Liong ,&nbsp;Charlene Liew Jin Yee","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chest X-rays (CXRs) are crucial for diagnosing and managing lung conditions. While CXR is a common and cost-effective diagnostic tool, interpreting the high volume of CXRs is challenging due to workforce limitations. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promise in enhancing efficiency and accuracy. However, real-world applicability and generalizability across diverse patient cohorts remain areas of concerns. In our study, the LUNIT INSIGHT CXR Triage software was evaluated in a diverse patient cohort. Forty-three radiologists, blinded to AI results, assessed CXRs categorized into normal, non-urgent, and urgent using a 3-tier classification system. Performance metrics and turnaround times were analyzed.</div><div>The AI system demonstrated sensitivity of 89% for normal CXRs, specificity of 93%, PPV of 83%, and NPV of 95%, with an F1 score of 0.86 and an AUC of 0.91. For non-urgent CXRs, sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 91%, with PPV and NPV at 94% and 89%, respectively, and an F1 score of 0.94 and an AUC of 0.92. In the urgent category, sensitivity was 82%, specificity 99%, PPV 90%, and NPV 98%. Subgroup analysis revealed consistently high accuracy across various age groups (Young, Adult, Senior), genders, and ethnicities (Chinese, Malay, Indian, Others), with sensitivity, specificity, and AUC consistently above 84%. The AI system also significantly reduced turnaround times across all subgroups, indicating its robust performance and generalizability in diverse healthcare settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 111783"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World evaluation of an AI triaging system for chest X-rays: A prospective clinical study\",\"authors\":\"Srinath Sridharan ,&nbsp;Alicia Seah Xin Hui ,&nbsp;Narayan Venkataraman ,&nbsp;Prasanna Sivanath Tirukonda ,&nbsp;Ram Pratab Jeyaratnam ,&nbsp;Sindhu John ,&nbsp;Saraswathy Suresh Babu ,&nbsp;Perry Liew ,&nbsp;Joe Francis ,&nbsp;Tsai Koh Tzan ,&nbsp;Wong Kang Min ,&nbsp;Goh Min Liong ,&nbsp;Charlene Liew Jin Yee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Chest X-rays (CXRs) are crucial for diagnosing and managing lung conditions. While CXR is a common and cost-effective diagnostic tool, interpreting the high volume of CXRs is challenging due to workforce limitations. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promise in enhancing efficiency and accuracy. However, real-world applicability and generalizability across diverse patient cohorts remain areas of concerns. In our study, the LUNIT INSIGHT CXR Triage software was evaluated in a diverse patient cohort. Forty-three radiologists, blinded to AI results, assessed CXRs categorized into normal, non-urgent, and urgent using a 3-tier classification system. Performance metrics and turnaround times were analyzed.</div><div>The AI system demonstrated sensitivity of 89% for normal CXRs, specificity of 93%, PPV of 83%, and NPV of 95%, with an F1 score of 0.86 and an AUC of 0.91. For non-urgent CXRs, sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 91%, with PPV and NPV at 94% and 89%, respectively, and an F1 score of 0.94 and an AUC of 0.92. In the urgent category, sensitivity was 82%, specificity 99%, PPV 90%, and NPV 98%. Subgroup analysis revealed consistently high accuracy across various age groups (Young, Adult, Senior), genders, and ethnicities (Chinese, Malay, Indian, Others), with sensitivity, specificity, and AUC consistently above 84%. The AI system also significantly reduced turnaround times across all subgroups, indicating its robust performance and generalizability in diverse healthcare settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111783\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24004996\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24004996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胸部 X 光检查 (CXR) 对于诊断和治疗肺部疾病至关重要。虽然 CXR 是一种常见且具有成本效益的诊断工具,但由于劳动力的限制,解释大量的 CXR 具有挑战性。人工智能(AI)有望提高效率和准确性。然而,现实世界的适用性和对不同患者群体的普适性仍然是令人担忧的问题。在我们的研究中,LUNIT INSIGHT CXR 分诊软件在不同的患者群体中进行了评估。43 名放射科医生在对人工智能结果保密的情况下,采用三级分类系统对分为正常、非紧急和紧急的 CXR 进行了评估。人工智能系统对正常 CXR 的灵敏度为 89%,特异性为 93%,PPV 为 83%,NPV 为 95%,F1 得分为 0.86,AUC 为 0.91。非急诊 CXR 的敏感性和特异性分别为 93% 和 91%,PPV 和 NPV 分别为 94% 和 89%,F1 得分为 0.94,AUC 为 0.92。在紧急类别中,灵敏度为 82%,特异性为 99%,PPV 为 90%,NPV 为 98%。分组分析表明,不同年龄组(青年、成年、老年)、性别和种族(华人、马来人、印度人、其他)的准确率都很高,灵敏度、特异性和 AUC 均高于 84%。该人工智能系统还大大缩短了所有亚组的周转时间,这表明它在不同医疗环境中具有强大的性能和通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-World evaluation of an AI triaging system for chest X-rays: A prospective clinical study
Chest X-rays (CXRs) are crucial for diagnosing and managing lung conditions. While CXR is a common and cost-effective diagnostic tool, interpreting the high volume of CXRs is challenging due to workforce limitations. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promise in enhancing efficiency and accuracy. However, real-world applicability and generalizability across diverse patient cohorts remain areas of concerns. In our study, the LUNIT INSIGHT CXR Triage software was evaluated in a diverse patient cohort. Forty-three radiologists, blinded to AI results, assessed CXRs categorized into normal, non-urgent, and urgent using a 3-tier classification system. Performance metrics and turnaround times were analyzed.
The AI system demonstrated sensitivity of 89% for normal CXRs, specificity of 93%, PPV of 83%, and NPV of 95%, with an F1 score of 0.86 and an AUC of 0.91. For non-urgent CXRs, sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 91%, with PPV and NPV at 94% and 89%, respectively, and an F1 score of 0.94 and an AUC of 0.92. In the urgent category, sensitivity was 82%, specificity 99%, PPV 90%, and NPV 98%. Subgroup analysis revealed consistently high accuracy across various age groups (Young, Adult, Senior), genders, and ethnicities (Chinese, Malay, Indian, Others), with sensitivity, specificity, and AUC consistently above 84%. The AI system also significantly reduced turnaround times across all subgroups, indicating its robust performance and generalizability in diverse healthcare settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Multilingual feasibility of GPT-4o for automated Voice-to-Text CT and MRI report transcription. Predicting functional outcome after open lumbar fusion surgery: A retrospective multicenter cohort study ECG, clinical and novel CT-imaging predictors of necessary pacemaker implantation after transfemoral aortic valve replacement In-vivo cerebral artery pulsation assessment with Dynamic computed tomography angiography Diagnostic performance of Photon-counting CT angiography in peripheral artery disease compared to DSA as gold standard
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1