{"title":"术中透视可降低全髋关节置换术后腿长不一致的程度和发生率","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Leg-length discrepancy (LLD) can lead to patient dissatisfaction and decreased function after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study examines the impact of intraoperative fluoroscopy on the magnitude and incidence of LLD after THA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing primary THA were identified and stratified into cohorts based on one out of 4 surgical approaches and intraoperative fluoroscopy use. The most recent 100 patients matching each cohort were included. Preoperative and postoperative LLD was assessed radiographically via an interteardrop reference line to lesser trochanter measurement.Magnitude of LLD and the proportion of patients in each cohort with LLD >5 mm, >10 mm, and 15 mm were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four hundred patients were stratified into 4 equal cohorts. Overall, THA done with fluoroscopy yielded fewer leg length discrepancies than THA done without fluoroscopy. The anterior-based muscle sparing (ABMS) approach with fluoroscopy had significantly less postoperative LLD than the posterior approach without fluoroscopy (3.4 vs 5.1 mm, <em>P</em> < .01) and the ABMS approach in the lateral position without fluoroscopy (3.4 vs 4.8 mm, <em>P</em> = .03). For LLD >5 mm, the ABMS approach with fluoroscopy cohort had significantly fewer patients compared to the ABMS approach without fluoroscopy (23 vs 41, <em>P</em> < .01). For LLD >10 mm, the ABMS approach with fluoroscopy cohort had significantly fewer patients compared to the posterior approach without fluoroscopy (2 vs 15, <em>P</em> < .01). For LLD >15 mm, relative to the posterior approach without fluoroscopy, all other cohorts had significantly fewer outliers (<em>P</em> < .02).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study supplies evidence that use of intraoperative fluoroscopy is likely beneficial in reducing the magnitude of LLD following THA and reducing the incidence of outlier LLDs >5 mm, >10 mm, and <15 mm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Decreases Magnitude and Incidence of Leg-Length Discrepancy Following Total Hip Arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Leg-length discrepancy (LLD) can lead to patient dissatisfaction and decreased function after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study examines the impact of intraoperative fluoroscopy on the magnitude and incidence of LLD after THA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing primary THA were identified and stratified into cohorts based on one out of 4 surgical approaches and intraoperative fluoroscopy use. The most recent 100 patients matching each cohort were included. Preoperative and postoperative LLD was assessed radiographically via an interteardrop reference line to lesser trochanter measurement.Magnitude of LLD and the proportion of patients in each cohort with LLD >5 mm, >10 mm, and 15 mm were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four hundred patients were stratified into 4 equal cohorts. Overall, THA done with fluoroscopy yielded fewer leg length discrepancies than THA done without fluoroscopy. The anterior-based muscle sparing (ABMS) approach with fluoroscopy had significantly less postoperative LLD than the posterior approach without fluoroscopy (3.4 vs 5.1 mm, <em>P</em> < .01) and the ABMS approach in the lateral position without fluoroscopy (3.4 vs 4.8 mm, <em>P</em> = .03). For LLD >5 mm, the ABMS approach with fluoroscopy cohort had significantly fewer patients compared to the ABMS approach without fluoroscopy (23 vs 41, <em>P</em> < .01). For LLD >10 mm, the ABMS approach with fluoroscopy cohort had significantly fewer patients compared to the posterior approach without fluoroscopy (2 vs 15, <em>P</em> < .01). For LLD >15 mm, relative to the posterior approach without fluoroscopy, all other cohorts had significantly fewer outliers (<em>P</em> < .02).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study supplies evidence that use of intraoperative fluoroscopy is likely beneficial in reducing the magnitude of LLD following THA and reducing the incidence of outlier LLDs >5 mm, >10 mm, and <15 mm.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroplasty Today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroplasty Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124001778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124001778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Decreases Magnitude and Incidence of Leg-Length Discrepancy Following Total Hip Arthroplasty
Background
Leg-length discrepancy (LLD) can lead to patient dissatisfaction and decreased function after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study examines the impact of intraoperative fluoroscopy on the magnitude and incidence of LLD after THA.
Methods
Patients undergoing primary THA were identified and stratified into cohorts based on one out of 4 surgical approaches and intraoperative fluoroscopy use. The most recent 100 patients matching each cohort were included. Preoperative and postoperative LLD was assessed radiographically via an interteardrop reference line to lesser trochanter measurement.Magnitude of LLD and the proportion of patients in each cohort with LLD >5 mm, >10 mm, and 15 mm were analyzed.
Results
Four hundred patients were stratified into 4 equal cohorts. Overall, THA done with fluoroscopy yielded fewer leg length discrepancies than THA done without fluoroscopy. The anterior-based muscle sparing (ABMS) approach with fluoroscopy had significantly less postoperative LLD than the posterior approach without fluoroscopy (3.4 vs 5.1 mm, P < .01) and the ABMS approach in the lateral position without fluoroscopy (3.4 vs 4.8 mm, P = .03). For LLD >5 mm, the ABMS approach with fluoroscopy cohort had significantly fewer patients compared to the ABMS approach without fluoroscopy (23 vs 41, P < .01). For LLD >10 mm, the ABMS approach with fluoroscopy cohort had significantly fewer patients compared to the posterior approach without fluoroscopy (2 vs 15, P < .01). For LLD >15 mm, relative to the posterior approach without fluoroscopy, all other cohorts had significantly fewer outliers (P < .02).
Conclusions
This study supplies evidence that use of intraoperative fluoroscopy is likely beneficial in reducing the magnitude of LLD following THA and reducing the incidence of outlier LLDs >5 mm, >10 mm, and <15 mm.
期刊介绍:
Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.