Larisa-Maria Dina , Tim J. Smith , Tobias U. Hauser , Eleanor J. Dommett
{"title":"跨越生命周期的自然评估:生态环境中抑制测量的系统回顾","authors":"Larisa-Maria Dina , Tim J. Smith , Tobias U. Hauser , Eleanor J. Dommett","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Inhibitory control is essential for our everyday lives. Despite this, it is commonly assessed using non-naturalistic assessments. In this systematic review, we argue for the importance of taking an ecological approach to assess cognition. The aims are to present the state-of-knowledge in naturalistic assessments of inhibitory control, focusing on their methodological characteristics, including psychometric properties and user experience. PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched until September 2024. Studies were included if they used at least one naturalistic method of assessing inhibition. The included studies (N=64) were grouped into three methodological categories: gamification, virtual reality, and brief, repeated assessments in participants’ usual environment in the form of ecological momentary assessments. Sample sizes spanned three orders of magnitude (N=12–22,098). We report considerable heterogeneity in the types of tasks used, and the psychometric details reported. Nonetheless, naturalistic tasks were generally comparable with standardised equivalents, although some tasks assessed mixed-domain constructs. Tasks were feasible and acceptable for participants, with generally high completion rates and engagement. Recommendations for future research are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 105915"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Naturalistic assessments across the lifespan: Systematic review of inhibition measures in ecological settings\",\"authors\":\"Larisa-Maria Dina , Tim J. Smith , Tobias U. Hauser , Eleanor J. Dommett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Inhibitory control is essential for our everyday lives. Despite this, it is commonly assessed using non-naturalistic assessments. In this systematic review, we argue for the importance of taking an ecological approach to assess cognition. The aims are to present the state-of-knowledge in naturalistic assessments of inhibitory control, focusing on their methodological characteristics, including psychometric properties and user experience. PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched until September 2024. Studies were included if they used at least one naturalistic method of assessing inhibition. The included studies (N=64) were grouped into three methodological categories: gamification, virtual reality, and brief, repeated assessments in participants’ usual environment in the form of ecological momentary assessments. Sample sizes spanned three orders of magnitude (N=12–22,098). We report considerable heterogeneity in the types of tasks used, and the psychometric details reported. Nonetheless, naturalistic tasks were generally comparable with standardised equivalents, although some tasks assessed mixed-domain constructs. Tasks were feasible and acceptable for participants, with generally high completion rates and engagement. Recommendations for future research are discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"volume\":\"167 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105915\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763424003841\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763424003841","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
抑制控制对我们的日常生活至关重要。尽管如此,对它的评估通常采用非自然的评估方法。在这篇系统性综述中,我们论证了采用生态学方法评估认知的重要性。目的是介绍抑制控制自然评估的知识现状,重点关注其方法特点,包括心理测量特性和用户体验。对 PubMed、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science 的检索截止到 2024 年 9 月。只要研究使用了至少一种自然主义抑制评估方法,均被纳入研究范围。纳入的研究(N=64)被分为三个方法类别:游戏化、虚拟现实和在参与者的常规环境中以生态瞬间评估的形式进行的简短重复评估。样本量跨越三个数量级(N=12-22,098)。我们报告了所使用的任务类型和所报告的心理测量细节方面存在的相当大的差异。不过,尽管有些任务评估的是混合领域的结构,但自然任务一般都与标准化的等效任务具有可比性。任务对参与者来说是可行和可接受的,完成率和参与度普遍较高。本文讨论了对未来研究的建议。
Naturalistic assessments across the lifespan: Systematic review of inhibition measures in ecological settings
Inhibitory control is essential for our everyday lives. Despite this, it is commonly assessed using non-naturalistic assessments. In this systematic review, we argue for the importance of taking an ecological approach to assess cognition. The aims are to present the state-of-knowledge in naturalistic assessments of inhibitory control, focusing on their methodological characteristics, including psychometric properties and user experience. PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched until September 2024. Studies were included if they used at least one naturalistic method of assessing inhibition. The included studies (N=64) were grouped into three methodological categories: gamification, virtual reality, and brief, repeated assessments in participants’ usual environment in the form of ecological momentary assessments. Sample sizes spanned three orders of magnitude (N=12–22,098). We report considerable heterogeneity in the types of tasks used, and the psychometric details reported. Nonetheless, naturalistic tasks were generally comparable with standardised equivalents, although some tasks assessed mixed-domain constructs. Tasks were feasible and acceptable for participants, with generally high completion rates and engagement. Recommendations for future research are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.