时空取样和生物复制对使用 eDNA 元标码检测海带森林鱼类群落的影响

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1002/edn3.70023
Kira-Lee Courtaillac, Jannes Landschoff, Kelvin Hull, Sophie von der Heyden
{"title":"时空取样和生物复制对使用 eDNA 元标码检测海带森林鱼类群落的影响","authors":"Kira-Lee Courtaillac,&nbsp;Jannes Landschoff,&nbsp;Kelvin Hull,&nbsp;Sophie von der Heyden","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding surveys can support the acquisition of extensive biodiversity data to support ecosystem monitoring and conservation actions. However, the optimization of eDNA metabarcoding project design is essential to capture spatio-temporal heterogeneity of eDNA signals and maximize diversity detection. In this study, we developed a system-specific approach to detect fish communities in kelp forests, by analyzing fine-scale spatio-temporal patterns in eDNA signals at two sites along the South African coastline, as well as testing the effect of biological replication and pooling of replicates on species detection. At each site, samples were collected at two stations along the shoreline at two depth zones, and this was repeated at two time points (24 h apart). We detected 113 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) across 32 families, but fewer than 20% of OTUs could be assigned to species, indicating that barcode reference libraries need to be drastically improved. We detected significant differences in communities across small spatial scales (&lt; 600 m) and time points, suggesting that to best capture a site's diversity patterns, samples should be collected at multiple points and times within at least 24 h. To detect ~80% of the fish community, including some low abundance species, a minimum of four samples appear sufficient. In addition, a higher number of OTUs (76 vs. 65) were found in individual replicates than in any of the pools. However, pooling samples prior to sequencing can still detect valuable broad-scale biodiversity patterns for monitoring and can offset the decrease in data resolution with the benefit of accumulating comprehensive data from increased sampling efforts over time. As a pilot investigation into how best to maximize kelp forest-associated fish communities, this study provides a basis for optimizing sampling design for coastal eDNA-based surveys in southern Africa and strengthens the development of long-term eDNA monitoring programs to better support conservation and management actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Spatio-Temporal Sampling and Biological Replication on the Detection of Kelp Forest Fish Communities Using eDNA Metabarcoding\",\"authors\":\"Kira-Lee Courtaillac,&nbsp;Jannes Landschoff,&nbsp;Kelvin Hull,&nbsp;Sophie von der Heyden\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.70023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding surveys can support the acquisition of extensive biodiversity data to support ecosystem monitoring and conservation actions. However, the optimization of eDNA metabarcoding project design is essential to capture spatio-temporal heterogeneity of eDNA signals and maximize diversity detection. In this study, we developed a system-specific approach to detect fish communities in kelp forests, by analyzing fine-scale spatio-temporal patterns in eDNA signals at two sites along the South African coastline, as well as testing the effect of biological replication and pooling of replicates on species detection. At each site, samples were collected at two stations along the shoreline at two depth zones, and this was repeated at two time points (24 h apart). We detected 113 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) across 32 families, but fewer than 20% of OTUs could be assigned to species, indicating that barcode reference libraries need to be drastically improved. We detected significant differences in communities across small spatial scales (&lt; 600 m) and time points, suggesting that to best capture a site's diversity patterns, samples should be collected at multiple points and times within at least 24 h. To detect ~80% of the fish community, including some low abundance species, a minimum of four samples appear sufficient. In addition, a higher number of OTUs (76 vs. 65) were found in individual replicates than in any of the pools. However, pooling samples prior to sequencing can still detect valuable broad-scale biodiversity patterns for monitoring and can offset the decrease in data resolution with the benefit of accumulating comprehensive data from increased sampling efforts over time. As a pilot investigation into how best to maximize kelp forest-associated fish communities, this study provides a basis for optimizing sampling design for coastal eDNA-based surveys in southern Africa and strengthens the development of long-term eDNA monitoring programs to better support conservation and management actions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70023\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境 DNA(eDNA)元标定调查可帮助获取大量生物多样性数据,为生态系统监测和保护行动提供支持。然而,为了捕捉 eDNA 信号的时空异质性并最大限度地检测多样性,优化 eDNA 元标定项目设计至关重要。在本研究中,我们在南非海岸线的两个地点分析了 eDNA 信号的精细尺度时空模式,并测试了生物复制和汇集复制对物种检测的影响,从而开发了一种特定于系统的方法来检测海藻林中的鱼类群落。在每个地点,沿海岸线在两个深度区域的两个站点采集样本,并在两个时间点(相隔 24 小时)重复采集。我们检测到横跨 32 个科的 113 个操作分类单元(OTU),但只有不到 20% 的 OTU 可归属于物种,这表明条形码参考库需要大幅改进。我们发现在较小的空间尺度(< 600 m)和时间点上群落存在明显差异,这表明要想最好地捕捉到一个地点的多样性模式,应在至少 24 小时内的多个时间点采集样本。要想检测到 ~80% 的鱼类群落(包括一些低丰度物种),至少采集四个样本似乎就足够了。此外,在单个重复样本中发现的 OTU 数量(76 个对 65 个)高于任何一个样本池。不过,在测序前将样本汇集在一起仍能发现有价值的大尺度生物多样性模式,从而进行监测,并可抵消数据分辨率的降低,因为随着时间的推移,采样工作的增加会带来全面数据的积累。作为对如何最大限度地扩大海藻森林相关鱼类群落的试点调查,本研究为优化南部非洲沿海 eDNA 调查的采样设计提供了基础,并加强了长期 eDNA 监测计划的发展,从而更好地支持保护和管理行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Spatio-Temporal Sampling and Biological Replication on the Detection of Kelp Forest Fish Communities Using eDNA Metabarcoding

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding surveys can support the acquisition of extensive biodiversity data to support ecosystem monitoring and conservation actions. However, the optimization of eDNA metabarcoding project design is essential to capture spatio-temporal heterogeneity of eDNA signals and maximize diversity detection. In this study, we developed a system-specific approach to detect fish communities in kelp forests, by analyzing fine-scale spatio-temporal patterns in eDNA signals at two sites along the South African coastline, as well as testing the effect of biological replication and pooling of replicates on species detection. At each site, samples were collected at two stations along the shoreline at two depth zones, and this was repeated at two time points (24 h apart). We detected 113 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) across 32 families, but fewer than 20% of OTUs could be assigned to species, indicating that barcode reference libraries need to be drastically improved. We detected significant differences in communities across small spatial scales (< 600 m) and time points, suggesting that to best capture a site's diversity patterns, samples should be collected at multiple points and times within at least 24 h. To detect ~80% of the fish community, including some low abundance species, a minimum of four samples appear sufficient. In addition, a higher number of OTUs (76 vs. 65) were found in individual replicates than in any of the pools. However, pooling samples prior to sequencing can still detect valuable broad-scale biodiversity patterns for monitoring and can offset the decrease in data resolution with the benefit of accumulating comprehensive data from increased sampling efforts over time. As a pilot investigation into how best to maximize kelp forest-associated fish communities, this study provides a basis for optimizing sampling design for coastal eDNA-based surveys in southern Africa and strengthens the development of long-term eDNA monitoring programs to better support conservation and management actions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Bottom Trawling and Multi-Marker eDNA Metabarcoding Surveys Reveal Highly Diverse Vertebrate and Crustacean Communities: A Case Study in an Urbanized Subtropical Estuary Evaluation of a Nanopore Sequencing Strategy on Bacterial Communities From Marine Sediments Current Trends in Biophysical Modeling of eDNA Dynamics for the Detection of Marine Species Validation of Environmental DNA for Estimating Proportional and Absolute Biomass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1