Matheus Augusto de Oliveira Fernandes , Bruno Eduardo Lobo Baêta , Oscar Fernando Herrera Adarme , Alberto Fonseca
{"title":"基于生命周期评估的咖啡渣厌氧消化碳足迹分析","authors":"Matheus Augusto de Oliveira Fernandes , Bruno Eduardo Lobo Baêta , Oscar Fernando Herrera Adarme , Alberto Fonseca","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.114993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While studies have shown that anaerobic digestion (AD) with energy generation of agricultural residues have many benefits, it is still unclear the extent to which this technology can reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly in the context of coffee husk wastes. To address this knowledge gap, this work explored three scenarios of coffee husks as an energy source: 0) business-as-usual (landfilling); 1) AD with energy generation; 2) same as the previous one, adding a hydrothermal hydrolysis pre-treatment step. The study adopted a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology to estimate the environmental impacts of this technology in terms of GHG emissions. The results indicate that the main benefit of using AD is to avoid the impacts of landfilling, as the carbon footprint for the landfilling scenario was more than 13 times higher than the others. The emissions from digestate management were the main source of the overall emissions, accounting for 34 %. However, its use to replace chemical fertilizers affected the environmental performance positively. The inclusion of the pre-treatment was a key factor in making the bioenergy from coffee husks less carbon-intensive than natural gas and oil, although common renewable sources such as wind and hydropower tend to have lower GHG emissions. Sensitivity analyses indicate that this type of bioenergy can mitigate GHG emissions from energy generation in coffee-producing countries with fossil-based energy mixes. Overall, this work fills a knowledge gap by providing empirical evidence to the potential benefits of using coffee husks in the world's transition to a low-carbon economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LCA-based carbon footprint analysis of anaerobic digestion of coffee husk waste\",\"authors\":\"Matheus Augusto de Oliveira Fernandes , Bruno Eduardo Lobo Baêta , Oscar Fernando Herrera Adarme , Alberto Fonseca\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2024.114993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While studies have shown that anaerobic digestion (AD) with energy generation of agricultural residues have many benefits, it is still unclear the extent to which this technology can reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly in the context of coffee husk wastes. To address this knowledge gap, this work explored three scenarios of coffee husks as an energy source: 0) business-as-usual (landfilling); 1) AD with energy generation; 2) same as the previous one, adding a hydrothermal hydrolysis pre-treatment step. The study adopted a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology to estimate the environmental impacts of this technology in terms of GHG emissions. The results indicate that the main benefit of using AD is to avoid the impacts of landfilling, as the carbon footprint for the landfilling scenario was more than 13 times higher than the others. The emissions from digestate management were the main source of the overall emissions, accounting for 34 %. However, its use to replace chemical fertilizers affected the environmental performance positively. The inclusion of the pre-treatment was a key factor in making the bioenergy from coffee husks less carbon-intensive than natural gas and oil, although common renewable sources such as wind and hydropower tend to have lower GHG emissions. Sensitivity analyses indicate that this type of bioenergy can mitigate GHG emissions from energy generation in coffee-producing countries with fossil-based energy mixes. Overall, this work fills a knowledge gap by providing empirical evidence to the potential benefits of using coffee husks in the world's transition to a low-carbon economy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007196\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007196","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
LCA-based carbon footprint analysis of anaerobic digestion of coffee husk waste
While studies have shown that anaerobic digestion (AD) with energy generation of agricultural residues have many benefits, it is still unclear the extent to which this technology can reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly in the context of coffee husk wastes. To address this knowledge gap, this work explored three scenarios of coffee husks as an energy source: 0) business-as-usual (landfilling); 1) AD with energy generation; 2) same as the previous one, adding a hydrothermal hydrolysis pre-treatment step. The study adopted a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology to estimate the environmental impacts of this technology in terms of GHG emissions. The results indicate that the main benefit of using AD is to avoid the impacts of landfilling, as the carbon footprint for the landfilling scenario was more than 13 times higher than the others. The emissions from digestate management were the main source of the overall emissions, accounting for 34 %. However, its use to replace chemical fertilizers affected the environmental performance positively. The inclusion of the pre-treatment was a key factor in making the bioenergy from coffee husks less carbon-intensive than natural gas and oil, although common renewable sources such as wind and hydropower tend to have lower GHG emissions. Sensitivity analyses indicate that this type of bioenergy can mitigate GHG emissions from energy generation in coffee-producing countries with fossil-based energy mixes. Overall, this work fills a knowledge gap by providing empirical evidence to the potential benefits of using coffee husks in the world's transition to a low-carbon economy.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.