利用无监督机器学习监控气体金属弧快速成型制造过程

IF 2.4 4区 材料科学 Q2 METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING Welding in the World Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1007/s40194-024-01836-z
Giulio Mattera, Joseph Polden, John Norrish
{"title":"利用无监督机器学习监控气体金属弧快速成型制造过程","authors":"Giulio Mattera,&nbsp;Joseph Polden,&nbsp;John Norrish","doi":"10.1007/s40194-024-01836-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study aimed to assess the performance of several unsupervised machine learning (ML) techniques in online anomaly (The term “anomaly” is used here to indicate a departure from expected process behavior which may indicate a quality issue which requires further investigation. The term “defect detection” has often been used previously but the specific imperfection is often indirectly inferred.) detection during surface tension transfer (STT)-based wire arc additive manufacturing. Recent advancements in quality monitoring for wire arc manufacturing were reviewed, followed by a comparison of unsupervised ML techniques using welding current and welding voltage data collected during a defect-free deposition process. Both time domain and frequency domain feature extraction techniques were applied and compared. Three analysis methodologies were adopted: ML algorithms such as isolation forest, local outlier factor, and one-class support vector machine. The results highlight that incorporating frequency analysis, such as fast Fourier transform (FFT) and discrete wavelet transform (DWT), for feature extraction based on general frequency response and defined bandwidth frequency response, significantly improves performance, reflected in a 14% increase in F2 score, compared with time-domain features extraction. Additionally, a deep learning approach employing a convolutional autoencoder (CAE) demonstrated superior performance by processing time-frequency domain data stored as spectrograms obtained through short-time Fourier transform (STFT) analysis. The CAE method outperformed frequency domain analysis and traditional ML approaches, achieving an additional 5% improvement in F2-score. Notably, the F2-score (The F2 score is the weighted harmonic mean of the precision and recall (given a threshold value). Unlike the F1 score, which gives equal weight to precision and recall, the F2 score gives more weight to recall than to precision.) increased significantly from 0.78 in time domain analysis to 0.895 in time-frequency analysis. The study emphasizes the potential of utilizing low-cost sensors to develop anomaly detection modules with enhanced accuracy. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating advanced data processing techniques in wire arc additive manufacturing for improved quality control and process optimization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":809,"journal":{"name":"Welding in the World","volume":"68 11","pages":"2853 - 2867"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40194-024-01836-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring the gas metal arc additive manufacturing process using unsupervised machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Giulio Mattera,&nbsp;Joseph Polden,&nbsp;John Norrish\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40194-024-01836-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The study aimed to assess the performance of several unsupervised machine learning (ML) techniques in online anomaly (The term “anomaly” is used here to indicate a departure from expected process behavior which may indicate a quality issue which requires further investigation. The term “defect detection” has often been used previously but the specific imperfection is often indirectly inferred.) detection during surface tension transfer (STT)-based wire arc additive manufacturing. Recent advancements in quality monitoring for wire arc manufacturing were reviewed, followed by a comparison of unsupervised ML techniques using welding current and welding voltage data collected during a defect-free deposition process. Both time domain and frequency domain feature extraction techniques were applied and compared. Three analysis methodologies were adopted: ML algorithms such as isolation forest, local outlier factor, and one-class support vector machine. The results highlight that incorporating frequency analysis, such as fast Fourier transform (FFT) and discrete wavelet transform (DWT), for feature extraction based on general frequency response and defined bandwidth frequency response, significantly improves performance, reflected in a 14% increase in F2 score, compared with time-domain features extraction. Additionally, a deep learning approach employing a convolutional autoencoder (CAE) demonstrated superior performance by processing time-frequency domain data stored as spectrograms obtained through short-time Fourier transform (STFT) analysis. The CAE method outperformed frequency domain analysis and traditional ML approaches, achieving an additional 5% improvement in F2-score. Notably, the F2-score (The F2 score is the weighted harmonic mean of the precision and recall (given a threshold value). Unlike the F1 score, which gives equal weight to precision and recall, the F2 score gives more weight to recall than to precision.) increased significantly from 0.78 in time domain analysis to 0.895 in time-frequency analysis. The study emphasizes the potential of utilizing low-cost sensors to develop anomaly detection modules with enhanced accuracy. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating advanced data processing techniques in wire arc additive manufacturing for improved quality control and process optimization.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Welding in the World\",\"volume\":\"68 11\",\"pages\":\"2853 - 2867\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40194-024-01836-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Welding in the World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40194-024-01836-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Welding in the World","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40194-024-01836-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究旨在评估几种无监督机器学习(ML)技术在在线异常(此处使用的术语 "异常 "表示与预期工艺行为的偏离,可能预示着需要进一步调查的质量问题。在基于表面张力传递(STT)的线弧增材制造过程中,"缺陷检测 "一词以前经常被使用,但具体的缺陷往往是间接推断出来的。在回顾了线弧制造质量监控的最新进展后,利用在无缺陷沉积过程中收集到的焊接电流和焊接电压数据,对无监督 ML 技术进行了比较。应用并比较了时域和频域特征提取技术。采用了三种分析方法:ML 算法,如隔离林、局部离群因子和单类支持向量机。结果表明,与时域特征提取相比,结合频率分析(如快速傅立叶变换(FFT)和离散小波变换(DWT))进行基于一般频率响应和定义带宽频率响应的特征提取,可显著提高性能,体现为 F2 分数提高了 14%。此外,一种采用卷积自动编码器(CAE)的深度学习方法通过处理以频谱图形式存储的时频域数据(通过短时傅里叶变换(STFT)分析获得),也表现出了卓越的性能。CAE 方法的性能优于频域分析和传统的 ML 方法,使 F2 分数提高了 5%。值得注意的是,F2 分数(F2 分数是精确度和召回率(给定阈值)的加权谐波平均值。与精确度和召回率权重相等的 F1 分数不同,F2 分数对召回率的权重高于精确度。)从时域分析中的 0.78 显著提高到时频分析中的 0.895。这项研究强调了利用低成本传感器开发具有更高精度的异常检测模块的潜力。这些发现强调了在线弧快速成型制造中采用先进数据处理技术以改进质量控制和流程优化的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monitoring the gas metal arc additive manufacturing process using unsupervised machine learning

The study aimed to assess the performance of several unsupervised machine learning (ML) techniques in online anomaly (The term “anomaly” is used here to indicate a departure from expected process behavior which may indicate a quality issue which requires further investigation. The term “defect detection” has often been used previously but the specific imperfection is often indirectly inferred.) detection during surface tension transfer (STT)-based wire arc additive manufacturing. Recent advancements in quality monitoring for wire arc manufacturing were reviewed, followed by a comparison of unsupervised ML techniques using welding current and welding voltage data collected during a defect-free deposition process. Both time domain and frequency domain feature extraction techniques were applied and compared. Three analysis methodologies were adopted: ML algorithms such as isolation forest, local outlier factor, and one-class support vector machine. The results highlight that incorporating frequency analysis, such as fast Fourier transform (FFT) and discrete wavelet transform (DWT), for feature extraction based on general frequency response and defined bandwidth frequency response, significantly improves performance, reflected in a 14% increase in F2 score, compared with time-domain features extraction. Additionally, a deep learning approach employing a convolutional autoencoder (CAE) demonstrated superior performance by processing time-frequency domain data stored as spectrograms obtained through short-time Fourier transform (STFT) analysis. The CAE method outperformed frequency domain analysis and traditional ML approaches, achieving an additional 5% improvement in F2-score. Notably, the F2-score (The F2 score is the weighted harmonic mean of the precision and recall (given a threshold value). Unlike the F1 score, which gives equal weight to precision and recall, the F2 score gives more weight to recall than to precision.) increased significantly from 0.78 in time domain analysis to 0.895 in time-frequency analysis. The study emphasizes the potential of utilizing low-cost sensors to develop anomaly detection modules with enhanced accuracy. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating advanced data processing techniques in wire arc additive manufacturing for improved quality control and process optimization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Welding in the World
Welding in the World METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Welding in the World publishes authoritative papers on every aspect of materials joining, including welding, brazing, soldering, cutting, thermal spraying and allied joining and fabrication techniques.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility study on machine learning methods for prediction of process-related parameters during WAAM process using SS-316L filler material Publisher Correction: Novel approach for in-line process monitoring during ultrasonic metal welding of dissimilar wire/terminal joints based on the thermoelectric effect Life cycle assessment in additive manufacturing of copper alloys—comparison between laser and electron beam Effect of Cr addition on microstructure, mechanical properties, and corrosion behavior of weld metal in weathering steel of high-speed train bogie Influence of travel speed on porosity and liquation cracking in cold wire pulsed gas metal arc welding of aa7075-t651 aluminum alloy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1