答复:"在莫桑比克实施艾滋病毒治疗差异化服务提供模式的成本效益和预算影响分析:模拟研究":资源减少不等于成本节约

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Journal of the International AIDS Society Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1002/jia2.26368
Dorlim Moiana Uetela, Marita Zimmermann, Ruanne Barnabas, Kenneth Sherr
{"title":"答复:\"在莫桑比克实施艾滋病毒治疗差异化服务提供模式的成本效益和预算影响分析:模拟研究\":资源减少不等于成本节约","authors":"Dorlim Moiana Uetela,&nbsp;Marita Zimmermann,&nbsp;Ruanne Barnabas,&nbsp;Kenneth Sherr","doi":"10.1002/jia2.26368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dear Editor,</p><p>We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the comments made in the letter “Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of the Implementation of Differentiated Service Delivery Models for HIV Treatment in Mozambique: a Modelling Study”: Resource reductions are not equal to cost savings [<span>1</span>].</p><p>First, we appreciate the authors’ recognition of the challenging work that we have done to generate evidence of the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of differentiated service delivery (DSD) models for HIV treatment in Mozambique.</p><p>Second, we agree with the authors that the savings mentioned in our work are not monetary, but opportunity costs, mainly due to the reduction in the use of healthcare provider time. This reduction could theoretically allow providers to see more clients and/or provide higher-quality care. The authors state that they have never encountered a healthcare system in sub-Saharan Africa that is either able or willing to reduce its total complement of healthcare workers in response to the advent of DSD models, and no mechanism or pathway exists for DSD models to “save money.” We agree that these responses are unlikely. Rather, the reduction of provider time represents time that could be used to increase care for other clients or health areas, improving the health of the population overall without increasing costs. Our study focused on describing the opportunity costs saved through DSD model implementation. While investigating specifically how those savings could be used to advance health was beyond the scope of our work, we appreciate the discussion of implications and application of our work.</p><p>The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.</p><p>DMU drafted the response. MZ, RB and KS reviewed the draft. All authors from the original article approved the final letter.</p>","PeriodicalId":201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jia2.26368","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response: “Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of the implementation of differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment in Mozambique: a modelling study”: resource reductions are not equal to cost savings\",\"authors\":\"Dorlim Moiana Uetela,&nbsp;Marita Zimmermann,&nbsp;Ruanne Barnabas,&nbsp;Kenneth Sherr\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jia2.26368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Dear Editor,</p><p>We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the comments made in the letter “Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of the Implementation of Differentiated Service Delivery Models for HIV Treatment in Mozambique: a Modelling Study”: Resource reductions are not equal to cost savings [<span>1</span>].</p><p>First, we appreciate the authors’ recognition of the challenging work that we have done to generate evidence of the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of differentiated service delivery (DSD) models for HIV treatment in Mozambique.</p><p>Second, we agree with the authors that the savings mentioned in our work are not monetary, but opportunity costs, mainly due to the reduction in the use of healthcare provider time. This reduction could theoretically allow providers to see more clients and/or provide higher-quality care. The authors state that they have never encountered a healthcare system in sub-Saharan Africa that is either able or willing to reduce its total complement of healthcare workers in response to the advent of DSD models, and no mechanism or pathway exists for DSD models to “save money.” We agree that these responses are unlikely. Rather, the reduction of provider time represents time that could be used to increase care for other clients or health areas, improving the health of the population overall without increasing costs. Our study focused on describing the opportunity costs saved through DSD model implementation. While investigating specifically how those savings could be used to advance health was beyond the scope of our work, we appreciate the discussion of implications and application of our work.</p><p>The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.</p><p>DMU drafted the response. MZ, RB and KS reviewed the draft. All authors from the original article approved the final letter.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International AIDS Society\",\"volume\":\"27 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jia2.26368\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International AIDS Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.26368\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.26368","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亲爱的编辑,我们很高兴有机会对《在莫桑比克实施艾滋病毒治疗差异化服务提供模式的成本效益和预算影响分析:一项模型研究》一文中的评论做出回应:首先,我们感谢作者对我们所做的具有挑战性工作的认可,我们所做的工作是为莫桑比克艾滋病治疗的差异化服务提供模式(DSD)的成本效益和预算影响提供证据。其次,我们同意作者的观点,即我们工作中提到的节省并非货币成本,而是机会成本,这主要是由于减少了医疗服务提供者的时间。从理论上讲,时间的减少可以让医疗服务提供者为更多的病人看病和/或提供更高质量的医疗服务。作者指出,他们在撒哈拉以南非洲从未遇到过医疗保健系统能够或愿意减少医疗保健人员的总编制来应对数据集定义模式的出现,也不存在数据集定义模式 "省钱 "的机制或途径。我们同意这些应对措施不太可能。相反,医护人员时间的减少代表着可以用来增加对其他客户或健康领域的护理,从而在不增加成本的情况下改善整体人口的健康状况。我们的研究侧重于描述通过实施数据集定义模式而节省的机会成本。虽然具体调查如何利用这些节省下来的成本来促进健康超出了我们的工作范围,但我们感谢对我们工作的影响和应用的讨论。MZ、RB 和 KS 对草稿进行了审阅。原文的所有作者都批准了最终信件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response: “Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of the implementation of differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment in Mozambique: a modelling study”: resource reductions are not equal to cost savings

Dear Editor,

We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the comments made in the letter “Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis of the Implementation of Differentiated Service Delivery Models for HIV Treatment in Mozambique: a Modelling Study”: Resource reductions are not equal to cost savings [1].

First, we appreciate the authors’ recognition of the challenging work that we have done to generate evidence of the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of differentiated service delivery (DSD) models for HIV treatment in Mozambique.

Second, we agree with the authors that the savings mentioned in our work are not monetary, but opportunity costs, mainly due to the reduction in the use of healthcare provider time. This reduction could theoretically allow providers to see more clients and/or provide higher-quality care. The authors state that they have never encountered a healthcare system in sub-Saharan Africa that is either able or willing to reduce its total complement of healthcare workers in response to the advent of DSD models, and no mechanism or pathway exists for DSD models to “save money.” We agree that these responses are unlikely. Rather, the reduction of provider time represents time that could be used to increase care for other clients or health areas, improving the health of the population overall without increasing costs. Our study focused on describing the opportunity costs saved through DSD model implementation. While investigating specifically how those savings could be used to advance health was beyond the scope of our work, we appreciate the discussion of implications and application of our work.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

DMU drafted the response. MZ, RB and KS reviewed the draft. All authors from the original article approved the final letter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Journal of the International AIDS Society IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International AIDS Society (JIAS) is a peer-reviewed and Open Access journal for the generation and dissemination of evidence from a wide range of disciplines: basic and biomedical sciences; behavioural sciences; epidemiology; clinical sciences; health economics and health policy; operations research and implementation sciences; and social sciences and humanities. Submission of HIV research carried out in low- and middle-income countries is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
In-utero exposure to tenofovir-containing pre-exposure prophylaxis and bone mineral content in HIV-unexposed infants in South Africa Patient and public involvement in HIV research: a mapping review and development of an online evidence map Abstract Supplement HIV Glasgow 10–13 November 2024, Glasgow, UK/Virtual Excess mortality attributable to AIDS among people living with HIV in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis Pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation gaps among people vulnerable to HIV acquisition: a cross-sectional analysis in two communities in western Kenya, 2021–2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1