重度嗜酸性粒细胞哮喘患者对美泊利珠单抗治疗反应的不同轨迹。

IF 16.6 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1183/13993003.00782-2024
Yuto Hamada,Dennis Thomas,Erin S Harvey,Sean Stevens,Michael Fricker,Hayley Lewthwaite,Vanessa M McDonald,Andrew Gillman,Mark Hew,Vicky Kritikos,John W Upham,Peter G Gibson
{"title":"重度嗜酸性粒细胞哮喘患者对美泊利珠单抗治疗反应的不同轨迹。","authors":"Yuto Hamada,Dennis Thomas,Erin S Harvey,Sean Stevens,Michael Fricker,Hayley Lewthwaite,Vanessa M McDonald,Andrew Gillman,Mark Hew,Vicky Kritikos,John W Upham,Peter G Gibson","doi":"10.1183/13993003.00782-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, characterised by a high disease burden, benefit from mepolizumab, which improves symptoms and reduces exacerbations, potentially leading to clinical remission in a subgroup. This study aimed to identify treatment response trajectories to mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma and to assess the achievement of clinical remission.Data from the Australian Mepolizumab Registry were used to assess treatment responses at 3, 6, and 12 months. The treatment response trajectories were identified using a group-based trajectory model. The proportions achieving clinical remission at 12 months, which was defined as well-controlled symptoms, no exacerbations, and no oral corticosteroid (OCS) use for asthma management, were compared between trajectories, and baseline predictors of the trajectories were identified using logistic regression analysis.We identified three trajectory groups: group 1, responsive asthma with less OCS use (n=170); group 2, responsive late-onset asthma (n=58); and group 3, obstructed and less responsive asthma (n=70). Groups 1 and 2 demonstrated higher proportions achieving clinical remission at 36.5% and 25.9%, respectively, compared to group 3 with 5.7% (p <0.001). Baseline predictors for assigned groups included lower OCS dose in group 1; greater FEV1% predicted, higher Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score, higher OCS dose, and nasal polyps in group 2; with group 3 as the reference.Treatment response to mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma follows 3 trajectories with varying proportions achieving clinical remission and differing baseline characteristics. Treatment response variability may influence the achievement of clinical remission with mepolizumab therapy.","PeriodicalId":12265,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinct trajectories of treatment response to mepolizumab toward remission in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.\",\"authors\":\"Yuto Hamada,Dennis Thomas,Erin S Harvey,Sean Stevens,Michael Fricker,Hayley Lewthwaite,Vanessa M McDonald,Andrew Gillman,Mark Hew,Vicky Kritikos,John W Upham,Peter G Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.00782-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, characterised by a high disease burden, benefit from mepolizumab, which improves symptoms and reduces exacerbations, potentially leading to clinical remission in a subgroup. This study aimed to identify treatment response trajectories to mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma and to assess the achievement of clinical remission.Data from the Australian Mepolizumab Registry were used to assess treatment responses at 3, 6, and 12 months. The treatment response trajectories were identified using a group-based trajectory model. The proportions achieving clinical remission at 12 months, which was defined as well-controlled symptoms, no exacerbations, and no oral corticosteroid (OCS) use for asthma management, were compared between trajectories, and baseline predictors of the trajectories were identified using logistic regression analysis.We identified three trajectory groups: group 1, responsive asthma with less OCS use (n=170); group 2, responsive late-onset asthma (n=58); and group 3, obstructed and less responsive asthma (n=70). Groups 1 and 2 demonstrated higher proportions achieving clinical remission at 36.5% and 25.9%, respectively, compared to group 3 with 5.7% (p <0.001). Baseline predictors for assigned groups included lower OCS dose in group 1; greater FEV1% predicted, higher Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score, higher OCS dose, and nasal polyps in group 2; with group 3 as the reference.Treatment response to mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma follows 3 trajectories with varying proportions achieving clinical remission and differing baseline characteristics. Treatment response variability may influence the achievement of clinical remission with mepolizumab therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00782-2024\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00782-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的疾病负担较重,可从美泊利珠单抗中获益,美泊利珠单抗可改善症状并减少病情恶化,有可能使一部分患者获得临床缓解。这项研究旨在确定严重嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者对美泊利珠单抗的治疗反应轨迹,并评估临床缓解的实现情况。澳大利亚美泊利珠单抗登记处的数据用于评估3、6和12个月的治疗反应。采用基于组别的轨迹模型确定了治疗反应轨迹。我们比较了不同轨迹之间在12个月时达到临床缓解的比例,临床缓解被定义为症状控制良好、无病情加重、无口服皮质类固醇(OCS)用于哮喘治疗,并使用逻辑回归分析确定了轨迹的基线预测因素。我们确定了三个轨迹组:第 1 组,反应性哮喘,使用 OCS 较少(人数=170);第 2 组,反应性晚发性哮喘(人数=58);第 3 组,阻塞性和反应性较低的哮喘(人数=70)。第一组和第二组获得临床缓解的比例较高,分别为 36.5% 和 25.9%,而第三组仅为 5.7%(P <0.001)。各组的基线预测因素包括:第1组的OCS剂量较低;第2组的FEV1%预测值较高、哮喘生活质量问卷评分较高、OCS剂量较高和鼻息肉较多;第3组为参照组。严重嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者对mepolizumab的治疗反应遵循3种轨迹,实现临床缓解的比例不同,基线特征也不同。治疗反应的变化可能会影响使用美泊利珠单抗治疗所取得的临床缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distinct trajectories of treatment response to mepolizumab toward remission in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.
Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, characterised by a high disease burden, benefit from mepolizumab, which improves symptoms and reduces exacerbations, potentially leading to clinical remission in a subgroup. This study aimed to identify treatment response trajectories to mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma and to assess the achievement of clinical remission.Data from the Australian Mepolizumab Registry were used to assess treatment responses at 3, 6, and 12 months. The treatment response trajectories were identified using a group-based trajectory model. The proportions achieving clinical remission at 12 months, which was defined as well-controlled symptoms, no exacerbations, and no oral corticosteroid (OCS) use for asthma management, were compared between trajectories, and baseline predictors of the trajectories were identified using logistic regression analysis.We identified three trajectory groups: group 1, responsive asthma with less OCS use (n=170); group 2, responsive late-onset asthma (n=58); and group 3, obstructed and less responsive asthma (n=70). Groups 1 and 2 demonstrated higher proportions achieving clinical remission at 36.5% and 25.9%, respectively, compared to group 3 with 5.7% (p <0.001). Baseline predictors for assigned groups included lower OCS dose in group 1; greater FEV1% predicted, higher Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score, higher OCS dose, and nasal polyps in group 2; with group 3 as the reference.Treatment response to mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma follows 3 trajectories with varying proportions achieving clinical remission and differing baseline characteristics. Treatment response variability may influence the achievement of clinical remission with mepolizumab therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Respiratory Journal
European Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) is the flagship journal of the European Respiratory Society. It has a current impact factor of 24.9. The journal covers various aspects of adult and paediatric respiratory medicine, including cell biology, epidemiology, immunology, oncology, pathophysiology, imaging, occupational medicine, intensive care, sleep medicine, and thoracic surgery. In addition to original research material, the ERJ publishes editorial commentaries, reviews, short research letters, and correspondence to the editor. The articles are published continuously and collected into 12 monthly issues in two volumes per year.
期刊最新文献
Airway derived emphysema-specific alveolar type II cells exhibit impaired regenerative potential in COPD. Pharmacological and pre-clinical safety profile of rSIV.F/HN, a hybrid lentiviral vector for cystic fibrosis gene therapy. Resolution of tuberculosis blood RNA signatures fails to discriminate persistent sputum culture positivity after 8 weeks of anti-tuberculous treatment. Microenvironmental acidification by pneumococcal sugar consumption fosters barrier disruption and immune suppression in the human alveolus. Single cell sequencing reveals cellular landscape alterations in the airway mucosa of patients with pulmonary long COVID.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1