针对严重高血糖患者的新诊断 2 型糖尿病强化简化策略:多中心、开放标签、随机试验

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1136/bmj-2024-080122
Liehua Liu, Weijian Ke, Hai Li, Fangping Li, Guanjie Fan, Jian Kuang, Jianhua Ma, Xiuwei Zhang, Bing Ji, Shu Li, Yinghong Du, Yaoming Xue, Zhaohui Lyu, Leili Gao, Shen Qu, Yongquan Shi, Li Yan, Wanping Deng, Chaoyan Xu, Peiji Dai, Lijuan Xu, Juan Liu, Xuesi Wan, Guohong Wei, Shuang Yu, Shubin Hong, Pengyuan Zhang, Zhimin Huang, Xiaopei Cao, Zhihong Liao, Haipeng Xiao, Yiming Mu, Yehuda Handelsman, Yanbing Li
{"title":"针对严重高血糖患者的新诊断 2 型糖尿病强化简化策略:多中心、开放标签、随机试验","authors":"Liehua Liu, Weijian Ke, Hai Li, Fangping Li, Guanjie Fan, Jian Kuang, Jianhua Ma, Xiuwei Zhang, Bing Ji, Shu Li, Yinghong Du, Yaoming Xue, Zhaohui Lyu, Leili Gao, Shen Qu, Yongquan Shi, Li Yan, Wanping Deng, Chaoyan Xu, Peiji Dai, Lijuan Xu, Juan Liu, Xuesi Wan, Guohong Wei, Shuang Yu, Shubin Hong, Pengyuan Zhang, Zhimin Huang, Xiaopei Cao, Zhihong Liao, Haipeng Xiao, Yiming Mu, Yehuda Handelsman, Yanbing Li","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2024-080122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To evaluate whether the intense simplified strategy, which comprises short term intensive insulin therapy (SIIT) followed by subsequent oral antihyperglycaemic regimens, could improve long term glycaemic outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe hyperglycaemia. Design Multicentre, open label, randomised trial. Setting 15 hospitals in China between December 2017 and December 2020. Participants 412 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and significant hyperglycaemia (HbA1c ≥8.5%). Interventions All randomised participants initially received SIIT for 2-3 weeks, followed by linagliptin 5 mg/day, metformin 1000 mg/day, combination linagliptin plus metformin, or lifestyle modification alone (control) for 48 weeks. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the percentage of participants achieving HbA1c <7.0% at week 48 after SIIT. Secondary outcomes included glycaemic control, β cell function, and variations in insulin sensitivity. Results 412 participants were randomised. At baseline, the mean age was 46.8 (standard deviation 11.2) years, mean body mass index was 25.8 (2.9), and mean HbA1c was 11.0% (1.9%). At week 48, 80% (78/97), 72% (63/88), and 73% (69/95) of patients in the linagliptin plus metformin, linagliptin, and metformin groups, respectively, achieved HbA1c <7.0%, compared with 60% (56/93) in the control group (P=0.02 overall; P=0.003 for linagliptin plus metformin versus control; P=0.12 for linagliptin versus control; P=0.09 for metformin versus control). Additionally, 70% (68/97), 68% (60/88), and 68% (65/95) of patients in the linagliptin plus metformin, linagliptin, and metformin group, respectively, achieved HbA1c <6.5% compared with 48% (45/93) in the control group (P=0.005 overall; P=0.005 for linagliptin plus metformin versus control; P=0.01 for linagliptin versus control; P=0.008 for metformin versus control; all were significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons). Thus, compared with the control group, participants in the linagliptin plus metformin group were more likely to achieve HbA1c <7.0% at week 48 (odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 5.65; P=0.005). Moreover, the linagliptin plus metformin group showed the most significant improvement in fasting plasma glucose and β cell function indices. All treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions The intense simplified strategy using subsequent oral therapies post-SIIT, especially the linagliptin plus metformin combination, sustainably improved glycaemic control and β cell function in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe hyperglycaemia. This approach offers a promising direction for decision making in the clinical management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT03194945][1] Data from this study can be requested from the corresponding author (liyb@mail.sysu.edu.cn) after its publication. Requests can be made for de-identified participant data, the data dictionary, and other specified datasets. Additionally, the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and informed consent form can be provided on request. Specific requests for data will require the submission of a proposal with a valuable research question as assessed by the study steering committee and may require a data access agreement to be signed. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT03194945&atom=%2Fbmj%2F387%2Fbmj-2024-080122.atom","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intense simplified strategy for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in patients with severe hyperglycaemia: multicentre, open label, randomised trial\",\"authors\":\"Liehua Liu, Weijian Ke, Hai Li, Fangping Li, Guanjie Fan, Jian Kuang, Jianhua Ma, Xiuwei Zhang, Bing Ji, Shu Li, Yinghong Du, Yaoming Xue, Zhaohui Lyu, Leili Gao, Shen Qu, Yongquan Shi, Li Yan, Wanping Deng, Chaoyan Xu, Peiji Dai, Lijuan Xu, Juan Liu, Xuesi Wan, Guohong Wei, Shuang Yu, Shubin Hong, Pengyuan Zhang, Zhimin Huang, Xiaopei Cao, Zhihong Liao, Haipeng Xiao, Yiming Mu, Yehuda Handelsman, Yanbing Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmj-2024-080122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To evaluate whether the intense simplified strategy, which comprises short term intensive insulin therapy (SIIT) followed by subsequent oral antihyperglycaemic regimens, could improve long term glycaemic outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe hyperglycaemia. Design Multicentre, open label, randomised trial. Setting 15 hospitals in China between December 2017 and December 2020. Participants 412 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and significant hyperglycaemia (HbA1c ≥8.5%). Interventions All randomised participants initially received SIIT for 2-3 weeks, followed by linagliptin 5 mg/day, metformin 1000 mg/day, combination linagliptin plus metformin, or lifestyle modification alone (control) for 48 weeks. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the percentage of participants achieving HbA1c <7.0% at week 48 after SIIT. Secondary outcomes included glycaemic control, β cell function, and variations in insulin sensitivity. Results 412 participants were randomised. At baseline, the mean age was 46.8 (standard deviation 11.2) years, mean body mass index was 25.8 (2.9), and mean HbA1c was 11.0% (1.9%). At week 48, 80% (78/97), 72% (63/88), and 73% (69/95) of patients in the linagliptin plus metformin, linagliptin, and metformin groups, respectively, achieved HbA1c <7.0%, compared with 60% (56/93) in the control group (P=0.02 overall; P=0.003 for linagliptin plus metformin versus control; P=0.12 for linagliptin versus control; P=0.09 for metformin versus control). Additionally, 70% (68/97), 68% (60/88), and 68% (65/95) of patients in the linagliptin plus metformin, linagliptin, and metformin group, respectively, achieved HbA1c <6.5% compared with 48% (45/93) in the control group (P=0.005 overall; P=0.005 for linagliptin plus metformin versus control; P=0.01 for linagliptin versus control; P=0.008 for metformin versus control; all were significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons). Thus, compared with the control group, participants in the linagliptin plus metformin group were more likely to achieve HbA1c <7.0% at week 48 (odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 5.65; P=0.005). Moreover, the linagliptin plus metformin group showed the most significant improvement in fasting plasma glucose and β cell function indices. All treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions The intense simplified strategy using subsequent oral therapies post-SIIT, especially the linagliptin plus metformin combination, sustainably improved glycaemic control and β cell function in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe hyperglycaemia. This approach offers a promising direction for decision making in the clinical management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT03194945][1] Data from this study can be requested from the corresponding author (liyb@mail.sysu.edu.cn) after its publication. Requests can be made for de-identified participant data, the data dictionary, and other specified datasets. Additionally, the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and informed consent form can be provided on request. Specific requests for data will require the submission of a proposal with a valuable research question as assessed by the study steering committee and may require a data access agreement to be signed. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT03194945&atom=%2Fbmj%2F387%2Fbmj-2024-080122.atom\",\"PeriodicalId\":22388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The BMJ\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The BMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-080122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-080122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 评估由短期胰岛素强化治疗(SIIT)和后续口服降糖药组成的强化简化策略能否改善新诊断的 2 型糖尿病和严重高血糖患者的长期血糖预后。设计 多中心、开放标签、随机试验。时间 2017 年 12 月至 2020 年 12 月,地点 中国 15 家医院。参与者 412 名新确诊的 2 型糖尿病和严重高血糖患者(HbA1c ≥8.5%)。干预措施 所有随机参与者首先接受为期2-3周的SIIT治疗,随后接受为期48周的利拉利汀5毫克/天、二甲双胍1000毫克/天、利拉利汀+二甲双胍联合治疗或单纯生活方式调整治疗(对照组)。主要结果测量 主要结果是在 SIIT 结束后第 48 周达到 HbA1c <7.0% 的参与者百分比。次要结果包括血糖控制、β 细胞功能和胰岛素敏感性的变化。结果 412 名参与者接受了随机治疗。基线平均年龄为 46.8 岁(标准差为 11.2),平均体重指数为 25.8(2.9),平均 HbA1c 为 11.0%(1.9%)。第48周时,利拉利汀联合二甲双胍组、利拉利汀组和二甲双胍组分别有80%(78/97)、72%(63/88)和73%(69/95)的患者HbA1c达到<7.0%,而对照组只有60%(56/93)(总P=0.02;利拉利汀联合二甲双胍与对照组相比P=0.003;利拉利汀与对照组相比P=0.12;二甲双胍与对照组相比P=0.09)。此外,利拉利汀联合二甲双胍组、利拉利汀组和二甲双胍组分别有 70% (68/97)、68% (60/88) 和 68% (65/95)的患者 HbA1c 达到<6.5%,而对照组为 48% (45/93)(P=0.005;利纳列汀加二甲双胍与对照组相比,P=0.005;利纳列汀与对照组相比,P=0.01;二甲双胍与对照组相比,P=0.008;经多重比较调整后,均有显著性)。因此,与对照组相比,利拉利汀联合二甲双胍组的参与者更有可能在第48周达到HbA1c<7.0%的目标(几率比2.78,95%置信区间1.37~5.65;P=0.005)。此外,利拉利汀联合二甲双胍组对空腹血浆葡萄糖和β细胞功能指数的改善最为显著。所有治疗的耐受性均良好。结论 SIIT 后使用后续口服疗法的密集简化策略,尤其是利拉利汀联合二甲双胍,可持续改善新诊断的 2 型糖尿病和严重高血糖患者的血糖控制和 β 细胞功能。这种方法为 2 型糖尿病的临床管理决策提供了一个很有前景的方向。试验注册 ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT03194945][1] 本研究的数据可在发表后向通讯作者(liyb@mail.sysu.edu.cn)索取。您可以索取去标识化的参与者数据、数据字典和其他指定数据集。此外,还可应要求提供研究方案、统计分析计划和知情同意书。具体的数据请求需要提交一份经研究指导委员会评估为有价值的研究问题的提案,并可能需要签署一份数据访问协议。[1]:/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT03194945&atom=%2Fbmj%2F387%2Fbmj-2024-080122.atom
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intense simplified strategy for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in patients with severe hyperglycaemia: multicentre, open label, randomised trial
Objective To evaluate whether the intense simplified strategy, which comprises short term intensive insulin therapy (SIIT) followed by subsequent oral antihyperglycaemic regimens, could improve long term glycaemic outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe hyperglycaemia. Design Multicentre, open label, randomised trial. Setting 15 hospitals in China between December 2017 and December 2020. Participants 412 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and significant hyperglycaemia (HbA1c ≥8.5%). Interventions All randomised participants initially received SIIT for 2-3 weeks, followed by linagliptin 5 mg/day, metformin 1000 mg/day, combination linagliptin plus metformin, or lifestyle modification alone (control) for 48 weeks. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the percentage of participants achieving HbA1c <7.0% at week 48 after SIIT. Secondary outcomes included glycaemic control, β cell function, and variations in insulin sensitivity. Results 412 participants were randomised. At baseline, the mean age was 46.8 (standard deviation 11.2) years, mean body mass index was 25.8 (2.9), and mean HbA1c was 11.0% (1.9%). At week 48, 80% (78/97), 72% (63/88), and 73% (69/95) of patients in the linagliptin plus metformin, linagliptin, and metformin groups, respectively, achieved HbA1c <7.0%, compared with 60% (56/93) in the control group (P=0.02 overall; P=0.003 for linagliptin plus metformin versus control; P=0.12 for linagliptin versus control; P=0.09 for metformin versus control). Additionally, 70% (68/97), 68% (60/88), and 68% (65/95) of patients in the linagliptin plus metformin, linagliptin, and metformin group, respectively, achieved HbA1c <6.5% compared with 48% (45/93) in the control group (P=0.005 overall; P=0.005 for linagliptin plus metformin versus control; P=0.01 for linagliptin versus control; P=0.008 for metformin versus control; all were significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons). Thus, compared with the control group, participants in the linagliptin plus metformin group were more likely to achieve HbA1c <7.0% at week 48 (odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 5.65; P=0.005). Moreover, the linagliptin plus metformin group showed the most significant improvement in fasting plasma glucose and β cell function indices. All treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions The intense simplified strategy using subsequent oral therapies post-SIIT, especially the linagliptin plus metformin combination, sustainably improved glycaemic control and β cell function in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe hyperglycaemia. This approach offers a promising direction for decision making in the clinical management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT03194945][1] Data from this study can be requested from the corresponding author (liyb@mail.sysu.edu.cn) after its publication. Requests can be made for de-identified participant data, the data dictionary, and other specified datasets. Additionally, the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and informed consent form can be provided on request. Specific requests for data will require the submission of a proposal with a valuable research question as assessed by the study steering committee and may require a data access agreement to be signed. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT03194945&atom=%2Fbmj%2F387%2Fbmj-2024-080122.atom
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
We need to rethink outcomes in Parkinson’s disease research Progress and challenges in NCD prevention and control in China Consider the patient as a whole Definitions of chronic disease need to be more patient centred Chronic disease and infection in China: lessons from the covid-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1