成人先天性心脏病诊断准确性的比较分析:三组医生和 ChatGPT 的研究

IF 0.8 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcchd.2024.100547
Edward Itelman, Einat Birk, Ayelet Machtei, Rafael Hirsch, Nili Schamroth Pravda
{"title":"成人先天性心脏病诊断准确性的比较分析:三组医生和 ChatGPT 的研究","authors":"Edward Itelman,&nbsp;Einat Birk,&nbsp;Ayelet Machtei,&nbsp;Rafael Hirsch,&nbsp;Nili Schamroth Pravda","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcchd.2024.100547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research letter evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of three physician groups—pediatric cardiologists, adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) specialists, and general cardiologists—and compares it to the performance of an AI (Artificial Intelligence) LLM model. Based on eight targeted questions in adult congenital heart disease, the analysis highlights significant disparities in correct answer rates, with congenital specialists achieving the highest accuracy and the AI model – the lowest.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73429,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100547"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of diagnostic accuracy in adult congenital heart disease: A study of three physician groups and ChatGPT\",\"authors\":\"Edward Itelman,&nbsp;Einat Birk,&nbsp;Ayelet Machtei,&nbsp;Rafael Hirsch,&nbsp;Nili Schamroth Pravda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcchd.2024.100547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This research letter evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of three physician groups—pediatric cardiologists, adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) specialists, and general cardiologists—and compares it to the performance of an AI (Artificial Intelligence) LLM model. Based on eight targeted questions in adult congenital heart disease, the analysis highlights significant disparities in correct answer rates, with congenital specialists achieving the highest accuracy and the AI model – the lowest.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100547\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666668524000569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666668524000569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这封研究信评估了三个医生群体(儿童心脏病专家、成人先天性心脏病(ACHD)专家和普通心脏病专家)的诊断准确性,并将其与人工智能(AI)LLM 模型的表现进行了比较。基于成人先天性心脏病的八个目标问题,分析结果表明正确答案率存在显著差异,先天性心脏病专家的准确率最高,而人工智能模型的准确率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of diagnostic accuracy in adult congenital heart disease: A study of three physician groups and ChatGPT
This research letter evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of three physician groups—pediatric cardiologists, adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) specialists, and general cardiologists—and compares it to the performance of an AI (Artificial Intelligence) LLM model. Based on eight targeted questions in adult congenital heart disease, the analysis highlights significant disparities in correct answer rates, with congenital specialists achieving the highest accuracy and the AI model – the lowest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease
International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Low birth weight associations with cardiac structure and function in adults after arterial switch for transposition of the great arteries Segmental MRI pituitary and hypothalamus volumes post Fontan: An analysis of the Australian and New Zealand Fontan registry Infective endocarditis: Awareness, knowledge gaps and behaviours amongst adults with congenital heart disease Comparative analysis of diagnostic accuracy in adult congenital heart disease: A study of three physician groups and ChatGPT Oxygen uptake efficiency slope at anaerobic threshold can predict peak VO2 in adult congenital heart disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1