胸主动脉手术后急性单侧声带麻痹的早期注射喉成形术

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Auris Nasus Larynx Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.anl.2024.09.006
Hanju Lee , Hyoung Woo Chang , Jeong-Yeon Ji , Jae Hang Lee , Kay-Hyun Park , Woo-Jin Jeong , Wonjae Cha
{"title":"胸主动脉手术后急性单侧声带麻痹的早期注射喉成形术","authors":"Hanju Lee ,&nbsp;Hyoung Woo Chang ,&nbsp;Jeong-Yeon Ji ,&nbsp;Jae Hang Lee ,&nbsp;Kay-Hyun Park ,&nbsp;Woo-Jin Jeong ,&nbsp;Wonjae Cha","doi":"10.1016/j.anl.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) following open thoracic aortic surgery increases pulmonary complications and hospital stays. An intervention protocol with early injection laryngoplasty (IL) and swallowing maneuvers was developed for acute UVFP following thoracic aortic surgery. This study aimed to compare the incidence of complications and length of medical care between the non-VFP and the IL-UVFP group managed under this protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent open thoracic aortic surgery from March 2020 to February 2023 were included, excluding those with preoperative VFP or postoperative bilateral VFP. Under the protocol, patients with UVFP and incomplete glottic closure received IL and swallowing maneuvers within one week after diagnosis, while those without a glottic gap started a soft diet along with swallowing maneuvers. Postoperative complications, including reintubation, ICU re-transfer, pneumonia, stroke, delirium, wound infection, and bleeding, as well as hospital and ICU stay, were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 355 patients included in the study, 51 (14.4%) developed postoperative UVFP, while 304 (85.6%) had normal VF function. In the UVFP group, 42 patients underwent IL, while 9 patients without a glottic gap did not undergo IL. The incidence of complications and length of medical care were analyzed in the non-VFP and the IL-UVFP groups. The IL-UVFP group had a longer median hospital stay compared to the non-VFP group (20.5 vs. 16.0 days), though this difference was not statistically significant (<em>P</em> = .0681). ICU stay (<em>P</em> = .5396) and ICU re-transfer rates (<em>P</em> = 1.00) were also comparable between the groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of pneumonia between the IL-UVFP group (4.8%) and the non-VFP group (9.5%) (<em>P</em> = .4003). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of stroke, delirium, wound infection, or bleeding between the groups. No IL-related complications were reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The protocol with early IL appears to help reduce complication rates in acute UVFP patients following thoracic aortic surgery to levels comparable to those in patients without VFP. This protocol could serve as a guideline for otolaryngologists in managing UVFP patients.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>2b/Individual cohort study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55627,"journal":{"name":"Auris Nasus Larynx","volume":"51 6","pages":"Pages 984-989"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early injection laryngoplasty for acute unilateral vocal fold paralysis after thoracic aortic surgery\",\"authors\":\"Hanju Lee ,&nbsp;Hyoung Woo Chang ,&nbsp;Jeong-Yeon Ji ,&nbsp;Jae Hang Lee ,&nbsp;Kay-Hyun Park ,&nbsp;Woo-Jin Jeong ,&nbsp;Wonjae Cha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anl.2024.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) following open thoracic aortic surgery increases pulmonary complications and hospital stays. An intervention protocol with early injection laryngoplasty (IL) and swallowing maneuvers was developed for acute UVFP following thoracic aortic surgery. This study aimed to compare the incidence of complications and length of medical care between the non-VFP and the IL-UVFP group managed under this protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent open thoracic aortic surgery from March 2020 to February 2023 were included, excluding those with preoperative VFP or postoperative bilateral VFP. Under the protocol, patients with UVFP and incomplete glottic closure received IL and swallowing maneuvers within one week after diagnosis, while those without a glottic gap started a soft diet along with swallowing maneuvers. Postoperative complications, including reintubation, ICU re-transfer, pneumonia, stroke, delirium, wound infection, and bleeding, as well as hospital and ICU stay, were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 355 patients included in the study, 51 (14.4%) developed postoperative UVFP, while 304 (85.6%) had normal VF function. In the UVFP group, 42 patients underwent IL, while 9 patients without a glottic gap did not undergo IL. The incidence of complications and length of medical care were analyzed in the non-VFP and the IL-UVFP groups. The IL-UVFP group had a longer median hospital stay compared to the non-VFP group (20.5 vs. 16.0 days), though this difference was not statistically significant (<em>P</em> = .0681). ICU stay (<em>P</em> = .5396) and ICU re-transfer rates (<em>P</em> = 1.00) were also comparable between the groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of pneumonia between the IL-UVFP group (4.8%) and the non-VFP group (9.5%) (<em>P</em> = .4003). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of stroke, delirium, wound infection, or bleeding between the groups. No IL-related complications were reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The protocol with early IL appears to help reduce complication rates in acute UVFP patients following thoracic aortic surgery to levels comparable to those in patients without VFP. This protocol could serve as a guideline for otolaryngologists in managing UVFP patients.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>2b/Individual cohort study.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auris Nasus Larynx\",\"volume\":\"51 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 984-989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auris Nasus Larynx\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814624001160\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auris Nasus Larynx","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814624001160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 开胸主动脉手术后出现的单侧声带麻痹(UVFP)会增加肺部并发症和住院时间。针对胸主动脉手术后的急性声带麻痹,制定了早期注射喉成形术(IL)和吞咽动作的干预方案。方法纳入 2020 年 3 月至 2023 年 2 月期间接受开胸主动脉手术的患者,排除术前 VFP 或术后双侧 VFP 患者。根据方案,UVFP和声门未完全闭合的患者在确诊后一周内接受IL和吞咽操作,而没有声门间隙的患者在接受吞咽操作的同时开始软食。研究评估了术后并发症,包括再次插管、ICU 再次转院、肺炎、中风、谵妄、伤口感染和出血,以及住院和 ICU 的时间。在 UVFP 组中,42 名患者接受了 IL,而 9 名没有声门间隙的患者没有接受 IL。对非 VFP 组和 IL-UVFP 组的并发症发生率和医疗护理时间进行了分析。与非 VFP 组相比,IL-UVFP 组的中位住院时间更长(20.5 天 vs. 16.0 天),但差异无统计学意义(P = .0681)。两组的重症监护室住院率(P = .5396)和重症监护室再转院率(P = 1.00)也相当。IL-UVFP组(4.8%)和非VFP组(9.5%)的肺炎发生率无明显差异(P = .4003)。此外,两组间中风、谵妄、伤口感染或出血的发生率也无明显差异。结论早期 IL 方案似乎有助于将胸主动脉手术后急性 UVFP 患者的并发症发生率降低到与无 VFP 患者相当的水平。该方案可作为耳鼻喉科医生管理 UVFP 患者的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early injection laryngoplasty for acute unilateral vocal fold paralysis after thoracic aortic surgery

Objective

Unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) following open thoracic aortic surgery increases pulmonary complications and hospital stays. An intervention protocol with early injection laryngoplasty (IL) and swallowing maneuvers was developed for acute UVFP following thoracic aortic surgery. This study aimed to compare the incidence of complications and length of medical care between the non-VFP and the IL-UVFP group managed under this protocol.

Methods

Patients who underwent open thoracic aortic surgery from March 2020 to February 2023 were included, excluding those with preoperative VFP or postoperative bilateral VFP. Under the protocol, patients with UVFP and incomplete glottic closure received IL and swallowing maneuvers within one week after diagnosis, while those without a glottic gap started a soft diet along with swallowing maneuvers. Postoperative complications, including reintubation, ICU re-transfer, pneumonia, stroke, delirium, wound infection, and bleeding, as well as hospital and ICU stay, were assessed.

Results

Of the 355 patients included in the study, 51 (14.4%) developed postoperative UVFP, while 304 (85.6%) had normal VF function. In the UVFP group, 42 patients underwent IL, while 9 patients without a glottic gap did not undergo IL. The incidence of complications and length of medical care were analyzed in the non-VFP and the IL-UVFP groups. The IL-UVFP group had a longer median hospital stay compared to the non-VFP group (20.5 vs. 16.0 days), though this difference was not statistically significant (P = .0681). ICU stay (P = .5396) and ICU re-transfer rates (P = 1.00) were also comparable between the groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of pneumonia between the IL-UVFP group (4.8%) and the non-VFP group (9.5%) (P = .4003). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of stroke, delirium, wound infection, or bleeding between the groups. No IL-related complications were reported.

Conclusions

The protocol with early IL appears to help reduce complication rates in acute UVFP patients following thoracic aortic surgery to levels comparable to those in patients without VFP. This protocol could serve as a guideline for otolaryngologists in managing UVFP patients.

Level of evidence

2b/Individual cohort study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Auris Nasus Larynx
Auris Nasus Larynx 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: The international journal Auris Nasus Larynx provides the opportunity for rapid, carefully reviewed publications concerning the fundamental and clinical aspects of otorhinolaryngology and related fields. This includes otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, allergology, head and neck medicine and oncologic surgery, maxillofacial and plastic surgery, audiology, speech science. Original papers, short communications and original case reports can be submitted. Reviews on recent developments are invited regularly and Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Auris Nasus Larynx are welcomed. Founded in 1973 and previously published by the Society for Promotion of International Otorhinolaryngology, the journal is now the official English-language journal of the Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan, Inc. The aim of its new international Editorial Board is to make Auris Nasus Larynx an international forum for high quality research and clinical sciences.
期刊最新文献
Identifying predictors of persistent post-earthquake dizziness among adolescents after the 2023 earthquakes in Türkiye: A cross-sectional, multicenter study Characterization of microbial diversity and eosinophilic otitis media biomarkers using next-generation sequencing Ultrasonography of the cricoarytenoid joint and its movements A narrative review of basic and clinical studies for vocal fold regeneration therapies Efficacy of 1.5% levofloxacin otic solution in treating acute otitis externa: A post hoc analysis of ENT103-3001, a multicenter randomized double-blind parallel-group placebo-controlled phase III study in otitis media with persistent otorrhea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1