谁拥有电动汽车(EV)?德克萨斯三角区不同价格段和品牌的电动汽车采用率与社会人口特征之间的关系

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS Research in Transportation Business and Management Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101225
Seung Jun Choi, Junfeng Jiao, Tigris Mendez
{"title":"谁拥有电动汽车(EV)?德克萨斯三角区不同价格段和品牌的电动汽车采用率与社会人口特征之间的关系","authors":"Seung Jun Choi,&nbsp;Junfeng Jiao,&nbsp;Tigris Mendez","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates disparities in Electric Vehicle (EV) adoption among different socio-economic groups and geographic areas within Texas. We focused on the Texas Triangle, which includes Austin, Houston, San Antonio, and the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area. Using EV registration data, our study applied unsupervised machine learning techniques, specifically hierarchical clustering analysis, to identify distinct patterns of EV adoption. We conducted a longitudinal analysis to investigate changes in carmakers' market share and to understand EV adoption patterns over time. We used Anselin Local Moran's I analysis to profile the characteristics of Tesla owners. Our analysis results revealed significant market segmentation in the EV market, particularly between different sale price ranges and brands. Notably, Tesla emerged as a market leader with strong brand appeal in the mid to high price tiers. EV adoption has been spreading from the Texas Triangle. Clusters with overall high EV registration, as identified in Anselin Local Moran's I analysis, were more associated with high-income, highly educated communities, where residents own multiple vehicles and are predominantly White. This trend was also observed among Tesla owners in relative to low-tier EV adopters. The mismatch exists between the density of registered EVs and the availability of both public and Tesla charging stations, with a notable disparity between urban centers and outskirts. More importantly, we highlight the reluctance of disadvantaged groups to purchase EVs, regardless of price or brand, underscoring the need for policy interventions that address distributive fairness. Current federal incentives and local rebate programs should better serve disadvantaged communities to promote equitable EV adoption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101225"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who owns Electric Vehicles (EVs)? The relationship between EV adoption and socio-demographic characteristics across different price segments and brands in the Texas triangle\",\"authors\":\"Seung Jun Choi,&nbsp;Junfeng Jiao,&nbsp;Tigris Mendez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates disparities in Electric Vehicle (EV) adoption among different socio-economic groups and geographic areas within Texas. We focused on the Texas Triangle, which includes Austin, Houston, San Antonio, and the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area. Using EV registration data, our study applied unsupervised machine learning techniques, specifically hierarchical clustering analysis, to identify distinct patterns of EV adoption. We conducted a longitudinal analysis to investigate changes in carmakers' market share and to understand EV adoption patterns over time. We used Anselin Local Moran's I analysis to profile the characteristics of Tesla owners. Our analysis results revealed significant market segmentation in the EV market, particularly between different sale price ranges and brands. Notably, Tesla emerged as a market leader with strong brand appeal in the mid to high price tiers. EV adoption has been spreading from the Texas Triangle. Clusters with overall high EV registration, as identified in Anselin Local Moran's I analysis, were more associated with high-income, highly educated communities, where residents own multiple vehicles and are predominantly White. This trend was also observed among Tesla owners in relative to low-tier EV adopters. The mismatch exists between the density of registered EVs and the availability of both public and Tesla charging stations, with a notable disparity between urban centers and outskirts. More importantly, we highlight the reluctance of disadvantaged groups to purchase EVs, regardless of price or brand, underscoring the need for policy interventions that address distributive fairness. Current federal incentives and local rebate programs should better serve disadvantaged communities to promote equitable EV adoption.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524001275\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539524001275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了德克萨斯州内不同社会经济群体和地理区域在电动汽车 (EV) 应用方面的差异。我们将重点放在德克萨斯三角区,包括奥斯汀、休斯顿、圣安东尼奥和达拉斯-沃斯堡大都会区。利用电动汽车注册数据,我们的研究采用了无监督机器学习技术,特别是分层聚类分析,来识别电动汽车采用的独特模式。我们进行了纵向分析,以调查汽车制造商市场份额的变化,并了解电动汽车随时间推移的采用模式。我们使用安塞林地方莫兰 I 分析法来概括特斯拉车主的特征。我们的分析结果表明,电动汽车市场存在明显的市场细分,尤其是在不同销售价格范围和品牌之间。值得注意的是,特斯拉在中高价位层成为市场领导者,具有强大的品牌号召力。电动汽车的采用已从德克萨斯三角洲蔓延开来。根据 Anselin Local Moran's I 的分析,电动汽车注册率较高的集群更多地与高收入、高学历社区相关,这些社区的居民拥有多辆汽车,且以白人为主。相对于低层次的电动汽车采用者,特斯拉车主也呈现出这种趋势。注册电动汽车的密度与公共充电站和特斯拉充电站的可用性之间存在不匹配,城市中心与郊区之间存在明显差异。更重要的是,我们强调弱势群体不愿购买电动汽车,无论价格或品牌如何,这突出表明需要采取政策干预措施来解决分配公平问题。当前的联邦激励措施和地方返利计划应更好地服务于弱势群体,以促进电动汽车的公平采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who owns Electric Vehicles (EVs)? The relationship between EV adoption and socio-demographic characteristics across different price segments and brands in the Texas triangle
This study investigates disparities in Electric Vehicle (EV) adoption among different socio-economic groups and geographic areas within Texas. We focused on the Texas Triangle, which includes Austin, Houston, San Antonio, and the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area. Using EV registration data, our study applied unsupervised machine learning techniques, specifically hierarchical clustering analysis, to identify distinct patterns of EV adoption. We conducted a longitudinal analysis to investigate changes in carmakers' market share and to understand EV adoption patterns over time. We used Anselin Local Moran's I analysis to profile the characteristics of Tesla owners. Our analysis results revealed significant market segmentation in the EV market, particularly between different sale price ranges and brands. Notably, Tesla emerged as a market leader with strong brand appeal in the mid to high price tiers. EV adoption has been spreading from the Texas Triangle. Clusters with overall high EV registration, as identified in Anselin Local Moran's I analysis, were more associated with high-income, highly educated communities, where residents own multiple vehicles and are predominantly White. This trend was also observed among Tesla owners in relative to low-tier EV adopters. The mismatch exists between the density of registered EVs and the availability of both public and Tesla charging stations, with a notable disparity between urban centers and outskirts. More importantly, we highlight the reluctance of disadvantaged groups to purchase EVs, regardless of price or brand, underscoring the need for policy interventions that address distributive fairness. Current federal incentives and local rebate programs should better serve disadvantaged communities to promote equitable EV adoption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
期刊最新文献
Air-rail intermodal collaborative decision making for aircraft recovery from airport station disruption Evaluation of intermodal transport chain: Case of importing tires through a China-Balkans routes Promoting sustainable usage behavior in the sharing economy business model: A study based on bike-sharing Can high-speed rail promote regional technological innovation? An explanation based on city network centrality Do Chilean cities have the right set of public transport modes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1