耕地保护措施对农民福利的影响:质量和生态双重视角

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107690
Kai Zou , Jiayu Tian , Yan Zhang
{"title":"耕地保护措施对农民福利的影响:质量和生态双重视角","authors":"Kai Zou ,&nbsp;Jiayu Tian ,&nbsp;Yan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the vital role of the quantity, quality, and ecology of cultivated lands in ensuring food security, climate resilience, and biodiversity conservation, cultivated land protection practices (CLPPs) have been applied to many regions across the world. However, the expansion of such practices faces challenges due to unknown welfare effects on the local population. This study uses data in a panel multinomial endogenous switching model at the plot level to estimate the heterogeneous impacts of different combinations of CLPPs on farmers' comprehensive welfare. Besides revealing factors influencing the adoption of CLPPs, results show that the welfare of farmers who adopted practices conducive to cultivated land quality improvement (CQI) and cultivated land ecological protection (CEP) significantly increased, by 9.59 % and 11.47 %, respectively. The welfare of joint adopters engaged in both practices (CQI &amp; CEP) increased by 23.89 %, which was significantly higher than the other two individual practices. After a specific cost-benefit analysis, the results revealed that CQI adopters and joint adopters attained positive economic profits, while CEP adopters incurred economic losses. A combination of these two practices emerged as the optimal choice for maximizing the welfare of farmers compared with adopting each of the CQI and CEP practices in isolation. Furthermore, these welfare effects vary with such factors as <em>technology training</em>, <em>assets</em>, <em>cooperative members</em>, and <em>plot size</em>. The work is expected to contribute to evidence-based policymaking about CLPPs promotion and sustainable use of cultivated lands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107690"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of cultivated land protection practices on farmers' welfare: A dual quality and ecology perspective\",\"authors\":\"Kai Zou ,&nbsp;Jiayu Tian ,&nbsp;Yan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Given the vital role of the quantity, quality, and ecology of cultivated lands in ensuring food security, climate resilience, and biodiversity conservation, cultivated land protection practices (CLPPs) have been applied to many regions across the world. However, the expansion of such practices faces challenges due to unknown welfare effects on the local population. This study uses data in a panel multinomial endogenous switching model at the plot level to estimate the heterogeneous impacts of different combinations of CLPPs on farmers' comprehensive welfare. Besides revealing factors influencing the adoption of CLPPs, results show that the welfare of farmers who adopted practices conducive to cultivated land quality improvement (CQI) and cultivated land ecological protection (CEP) significantly increased, by 9.59 % and 11.47 %, respectively. The welfare of joint adopters engaged in both practices (CQI &amp; CEP) increased by 23.89 %, which was significantly higher than the other two individual practices. After a specific cost-benefit analysis, the results revealed that CQI adopters and joint adopters attained positive economic profits, while CEP adopters incurred economic losses. A combination of these two practices emerged as the optimal choice for maximizing the welfare of farmers compared with adopting each of the CQI and CEP practices in isolation. Furthermore, these welfare effects vary with such factors as <em>technology training</em>, <em>assets</em>, <em>cooperative members</em>, and <em>plot size</em>. The work is expected to contribute to evidence-based policymaking about CLPPs promotion and sustainable use of cultivated lands.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"110 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107690\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002774\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002774","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于耕地的数量、质量和生态在确保粮食安全、气候适应能力和生物多样性保护方面的重要作用,耕地保护措施(CLPPs)已被应用于全球许多地区。然而,由于对当地人口的福利影响尚不可知,此类做法的推广面临挑战。本研究利用地块层面的面板多项式内生转换模型数据,估算了不同耕地保护措施组合对农民综合福利的异质性影响。结果显示,采用有利于耕地质量改善(CQI)和耕地生态保护(CEP)措施的农民的福利显著增加,分别增加了 9.59% 和 11.47%。同时采用两种做法(CQI & CEP)的联合采用者的福利增加了 23.89%,明显高于其他两种单独做法。经过具体的成本效益分析,结果显示,CQI 采用者和联合采用者获得了正的经济收益,而 CEP 采用者则蒙受了经济损失。与单独采用 CQI 和 CEP 中的每一种做法相比,将这两种做法结合起来是实现农民福利最大化的最佳选择。此外,这些福利效应因技术培训、资产、合作社成员和地块大小等因素而异。预计这项研究将有助于制定以证据为基础的耕地保护方案推广和耕地可持续利用政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impacts of cultivated land protection practices on farmers' welfare: A dual quality and ecology perspective
Given the vital role of the quantity, quality, and ecology of cultivated lands in ensuring food security, climate resilience, and biodiversity conservation, cultivated land protection practices (CLPPs) have been applied to many regions across the world. However, the expansion of such practices faces challenges due to unknown welfare effects on the local population. This study uses data in a panel multinomial endogenous switching model at the plot level to estimate the heterogeneous impacts of different combinations of CLPPs on farmers' comprehensive welfare. Besides revealing factors influencing the adoption of CLPPs, results show that the welfare of farmers who adopted practices conducive to cultivated land quality improvement (CQI) and cultivated land ecological protection (CEP) significantly increased, by 9.59 % and 11.47 %, respectively. The welfare of joint adopters engaged in both practices (CQI & CEP) increased by 23.89 %, which was significantly higher than the other two individual practices. After a specific cost-benefit analysis, the results revealed that CQI adopters and joint adopters attained positive economic profits, while CEP adopters incurred economic losses. A combination of these two practices emerged as the optimal choice for maximizing the welfare of farmers compared with adopting each of the CQI and CEP practices in isolation. Furthermore, these welfare effects vary with such factors as technology training, assets, cooperative members, and plot size. The work is expected to contribute to evidence-based policymaking about CLPPs promotion and sustainable use of cultivated lands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1