年轻人提名了多少朋友?平均离散度中心性的性别、年龄和地域差异荟萃分析

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Social Networks Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2024.10.001
Jennifer Watling Neal
{"title":"年轻人提名了多少朋友?平均离散度中心性的性别、年龄和地域差异荟萃分析","authors":"Jennifer Watling Neal","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This pre-registered meta-analysis uses multi-level random effects models to give precise estimates of average outbound best friend and friend nominations – average outdegree centrality – in youth friendship networks and examines whether average outdegree centrality varies by age, gender, and geographic region. Pooling 196 estimates reported in 51 articles reflecting 37 datasets from whole network studies, youth nominated 4.80 best friends on average (<span><math><mrow><mi>S</mi><mi>E</mi><mo>=</mo><mo>.</mo><mn>37</mn></mrow></math></span>). Additionally, pooling 64 estimates reported in 20 articles reflecting 18 datasets from whole network studies, youth nominated 6.05 friends on average (<span><math><mrow><mi>S</mi><mi>E</mi><mo>=</mo><mo>.</mo><mn>60</mn></mrow></math></span>). Early adolescents (10–14 years) nominated significantly more best friends than adolescents (15–18 years). However, there were no significant differences in average outdegree centrality by the gender or geographic region of the sample. Findings provide future research directions for understanding youth socializing environments and implications for peer interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"80 ","pages":"Pages 65-75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How many friends do youth nominate? A meta-analysis of gender, age, and geographic differences in average outdegree centrality\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Watling Neal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socnet.2024.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This pre-registered meta-analysis uses multi-level random effects models to give precise estimates of average outbound best friend and friend nominations – average outdegree centrality – in youth friendship networks and examines whether average outdegree centrality varies by age, gender, and geographic region. Pooling 196 estimates reported in 51 articles reflecting 37 datasets from whole network studies, youth nominated 4.80 best friends on average (<span><math><mrow><mi>S</mi><mi>E</mi><mo>=</mo><mo>.</mo><mn>37</mn></mrow></math></span>). Additionally, pooling 64 estimates reported in 20 articles reflecting 18 datasets from whole network studies, youth nominated 6.05 friends on average (<span><math><mrow><mi>S</mi><mi>E</mi><mo>=</mo><mo>.</mo><mn>60</mn></mrow></math></span>). Early adolescents (10–14 years) nominated significantly more best friends than adolescents (15–18 years). However, there were no significant differences in average outdegree centrality by the gender or geographic region of the sample. Findings provide future research directions for understanding youth socializing environments and implications for peer interventions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Networks\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 65-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000595\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项预先登记的荟萃分析采用多层次随机效应模型,对青少年友谊网络中的平均对外好友和好友提名--平均离度中心性--进行了精确估算,并研究了平均离度中心性是否会因年龄、性别和地理区域的不同而有所变化。汇总了 51 篇文章中的 196 个估计值,这些文章反映了来自整个网络研究的 37 个数据集,结果显示青少年平均提名了 4.80 个好友(SE=.37)。此外,汇总了 20 篇文章中的 64 个估计值,反映了整个网络研究中的 18 个数据集,青少年平均提名了 6.05 个朋友(SE=.60)。早期青少年(10-14 岁)提名的好友明显多于青少年(15-18 岁)。然而,样本的性别或地理区域在平均离散度中心性方面没有明显差异。研究结果为了解青少年社交环境提供了未来研究方向,并对同伴干预产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How many friends do youth nominate? A meta-analysis of gender, age, and geographic differences in average outdegree centrality
This pre-registered meta-analysis uses multi-level random effects models to give precise estimates of average outbound best friend and friend nominations – average outdegree centrality – in youth friendship networks and examines whether average outdegree centrality varies by age, gender, and geographic region. Pooling 196 estimates reported in 51 articles reflecting 37 datasets from whole network studies, youth nominated 4.80 best friends on average (SE=.37). Additionally, pooling 64 estimates reported in 20 articles reflecting 18 datasets from whole network studies, youth nominated 6.05 friends on average (SE=.60). Early adolescents (10–14 years) nominated significantly more best friends than adolescents (15–18 years). However, there were no significant differences in average outdegree centrality by the gender or geographic region of the sample. Findings provide future research directions for understanding youth socializing environments and implications for peer interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
期刊最新文献
Why distinctiveness centrality is distinctive Editorial Board How many friends do youth nominate? A meta-analysis of gender, age, and geographic differences in average outdegree centrality A stopping rule for randomly sampling bipartite networks with fixed degree sequences Multilevel integrated healthcare: The evaluation of Project ECHO® networks to integrate children’s healthcare in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1