空间和平

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105477
{"title":"空间和平","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the influence of the world around us on our behaviors and cognitions is a vital step in understanding people's individual and collective experiences with positive peace (Lindgaard, 2017; Lindsay et al., 2022). This paper begins as one of the first forays into weaving the theories and praxis in Urban Development and Design with the theories and praxis of Peace and Conflict Studies (PACS). As such, this paper is written for scholars and practitioners of both fields. The topics of this paper have been drawn from the research of the author on another project where he tested the saliency of one of the indicators of the peace poles, connectivity, and conducted interviews with social purpose organizations conducting their own research and community development in the geographical research area. The first section of this paper begins by outlining the foundational history, theory and principles of the evolution of space, place, and why they matter in cities. The next section grounds the understanding of spatiality and its implications on positive peace within the frameworks of urban planning and eco-urbanity. The following section provides possible pathways forward and next steps utilizing tools in urban development, civil society, and within the PACS fields. This is done to assist communities in ways aligned with the ethical humanistic foundations within urban development and PACS, including the tools and practices of placemaking, deep maps, and the spatial peace pole's quantified spatial peace assessment (Lindsay et al., 2022). The last section concludes with a summarization of these concepts and practices with their implications on Peace and Conflict Studies and the wider communities engaged in urban and economic development, as well as conflict resolution and political analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial peace\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding the influence of the world around us on our behaviors and cognitions is a vital step in understanding people's individual and collective experiences with positive peace (Lindgaard, 2017; Lindsay et al., 2022). This paper begins as one of the first forays into weaving the theories and praxis in Urban Development and Design with the theories and praxis of Peace and Conflict Studies (PACS). As such, this paper is written for scholars and practitioners of both fields. The topics of this paper have been drawn from the research of the author on another project where he tested the saliency of one of the indicators of the peace poles, connectivity, and conducted interviews with social purpose organizations conducting their own research and community development in the geographical research area. The first section of this paper begins by outlining the foundational history, theory and principles of the evolution of space, place, and why they matter in cities. The next section grounds the understanding of spatiality and its implications on positive peace within the frameworks of urban planning and eco-urbanity. The following section provides possible pathways forward and next steps utilizing tools in urban development, civil society, and within the PACS fields. This is done to assist communities in ways aligned with the ethical humanistic foundations within urban development and PACS, including the tools and practices of placemaking, deep maps, and the spatial peace pole's quantified spatial peace assessment (Lindsay et al., 2022). The last section concludes with a summarization of these concepts and practices with their implications on Peace and Conflict Studies and the wider communities engaged in urban and economic development, as well as conflict resolution and political analysis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124006917\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124006917","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理解周围世界对我们行为和认知的影响是理解人们个人和集体积极和平体验的重要一步(Lindgaard,2017 年;Lindsay 等人,2022 年)。本文是将城市发展与设计的理论和实践与和平与冲突研究(PACS)的理论和实践相结合的首次尝试之一。因此,本文是为这两个领域的学者和实践者撰写的。本文的主题来自作者对另一个项目的研究,在该项目中,作者测试了和平极点指标之一--连通性的显著性,并对在地理研究区域内开展自身研究和社区发展的社会目的组织进行了访谈。本文第一部分首先概述了空间、地点演变的基本历史、理论和原则,以及它们在城市中的重要性。下一节将在城市规划和生态城市的框架内理解空间性及其对积极和平的影响。下一节利用城市发展、公民社会和 PACS 领域的工具,提供了可能的前进道路和下一步措施。这样做是为了以符合城市发展和 PACS 中伦理人文基础的方式帮助社区,包括场所营造、深度地图和空间和平极点的量化空间和平评估(Lindsay 等人,2022 年)等工具和实践。最后一节总结了这些概念和实践对和平与冲突研究以及从事城市和经济发展、冲突解决和政治分析的更广泛群体的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spatial peace
Understanding the influence of the world around us on our behaviors and cognitions is a vital step in understanding people's individual and collective experiences with positive peace (Lindgaard, 2017; Lindsay et al., 2022). This paper begins as one of the first forays into weaving the theories and praxis in Urban Development and Design with the theories and praxis of Peace and Conflict Studies (PACS). As such, this paper is written for scholars and practitioners of both fields. The topics of this paper have been drawn from the research of the author on another project where he tested the saliency of one of the indicators of the peace poles, connectivity, and conducted interviews with social purpose organizations conducting their own research and community development in the geographical research area. The first section of this paper begins by outlining the foundational history, theory and principles of the evolution of space, place, and why they matter in cities. The next section grounds the understanding of spatiality and its implications on positive peace within the frameworks of urban planning and eco-urbanity. The following section provides possible pathways forward and next steps utilizing tools in urban development, civil society, and within the PACS fields. This is done to assist communities in ways aligned with the ethical humanistic foundations within urban development and PACS, including the tools and practices of placemaking, deep maps, and the spatial peace pole's quantified spatial peace assessment (Lindsay et al., 2022). The last section concludes with a summarization of these concepts and practices with their implications on Peace and Conflict Studies and the wider communities engaged in urban and economic development, as well as conflict resolution and political analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
The 15-minute city as paranoid urbanism: Ten critical reflections Police facial recognition applications and violent crime control in U.S. cities Do housing costs affect transportation? Longitudinal evidence from Australia High-speed rail in shrinking cities: A weapon for downturn or a catalyst for change Exploring the relationship between built environment and spatiotemporal heterogeneity of dockless bike-sharing usage: A case study of Shenzhen, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1