SCIENCE COMMUNICATION: THE IMPORTANCE OF LANGUAGE IN A DIVERSE WORLD

Our aim as the PGC Outreach Committee is to improve visibility, accessibility, and understanding of psychiatric genetics amongst both the general public and the wider scientific community. But how accessible are we really? How easily interpreted is the information we share to non-scientists? And how can we improve?

A systematic review of media coverage and readability in genome-wide association studies, published earlier this year, concluded that the language used to describe genetics research is too complex to be understood by the public. Over 95% of the online news sites examined would require more than twelve years of formal education for a full understanding of their content. The importance of language, particularly in genetics research, can extend beyond ‘readability’ to even more fundamental issues. For instance, another recent systematic review emphasised the need for defining ancestry based on the type of data used for its measurement (e.g., “genetic ancestry”), as failure to do so can result in reduced clarity concerning the distinction between genetic and social identities.

This symposium will delve into the critical role of language in the effective communication of scientific concepts to diverse audiences. Our presenters will first each discuss what the importance of language in a diverse world means from their own unique perspective (10 minutes each). They will cover topics such as the importance of the choice of words in relation to genetic ancestry and other complex concepts in psychiatric genetics such as heritability, and the impact of language in discussions surrounding the lived experience of those with psychiatric disorders. Broadly, the presentations will highlight how we can bridge the gap between technical jargon and layman's terms, making complex ideas accessible to a broader audience including those living with psychiatric conditions and their families, as well as how we can more accurately use language in our communications within the scientific community.

We will then have a panel discussion (30 minutes) in which the presenters will share insights into, for example, some of the challenges they have faced in science communication, such as combating misinformation, and what they believe the consequences for our field will be if we do not carefully consider the role of accurate and responsible communication in psychiatric genetics. We will conclude the session with questions from the audience (15 minutes).

Ultimately, the symposium will demonstrate that effective science communication is a dynamic interplay of language, empathy, and engagement, and will encourage attendees to consider the impact of their words in shaping public perceptions and attitudes towards psychiatric genetics.