{"title":"永不停止还是永不启动?在 CPT 和 EUT 混合偏好下的最佳停机方案","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2024.105925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We consider the problem of finding the best time to stop a diffusion process for an agent with a preference model that is a mixture of expected utility theory (EUT) and cumulative prospect theory (CPT). In view of time-inconsistency, we consider two types of agents: a naive agent, who is not aware of the time-inconsistency and thus re-plans at every instant, and a sophisticated agent, who is aware of the time-inconsistency and takes a so-called intra-personal equilibrium strategy by correctly anticipating her actions in the future. We show that under a wide range of the CPT preference parameter values, the naive agent will never stop. For a sophisticated agent, we use a different notion of intra-personal equilibrium from the one employed by <span><span>Ebert and Strack (2018)</span></span>. We show that any two-threshold strategy, which is to stop when the diffusion process reaches either an upper threshold or a lower threshold, cannot be an intra-personal equilibrium if the agent overweights worst, unlikely outcomes disproportionally. We derive a sufficient and necessary condition for the strategy of stopping everywhere to be an intra-personal equilibrium and show that this condition does not hold and thus the sophisticated agent may choose to start the diffusion process for some commonly used probability weighting functions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Never stop or never start? Optimal stopping under a mixture of CPT and EUT preferences\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jet.2024.105925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We consider the problem of finding the best time to stop a diffusion process for an agent with a preference model that is a mixture of expected utility theory (EUT) and cumulative prospect theory (CPT). In view of time-inconsistency, we consider two types of agents: a naive agent, who is not aware of the time-inconsistency and thus re-plans at every instant, and a sophisticated agent, who is aware of the time-inconsistency and takes a so-called intra-personal equilibrium strategy by correctly anticipating her actions in the future. We show that under a wide range of the CPT preference parameter values, the naive agent will never stop. For a sophisticated agent, we use a different notion of intra-personal equilibrium from the one employed by <span><span>Ebert and Strack (2018)</span></span>. We show that any two-threshold strategy, which is to stop when the diffusion process reaches either an upper threshold or a lower threshold, cannot be an intra-personal equilibrium if the agent overweights worst, unlikely outcomes disproportionally. We derive a sufficient and necessary condition for the strategy of stopping everywhere to be an intra-personal equilibrium and show that this condition does not hold and thus the sophisticated agent may choose to start the diffusion process for some commonly used probability weighting functions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Theory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022053124001315\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022053124001315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Never stop or never start? Optimal stopping under a mixture of CPT and EUT preferences
We consider the problem of finding the best time to stop a diffusion process for an agent with a preference model that is a mixture of expected utility theory (EUT) and cumulative prospect theory (CPT). In view of time-inconsistency, we consider two types of agents: a naive agent, who is not aware of the time-inconsistency and thus re-plans at every instant, and a sophisticated agent, who is aware of the time-inconsistency and takes a so-called intra-personal equilibrium strategy by correctly anticipating her actions in the future. We show that under a wide range of the CPT preference parameter values, the naive agent will never stop. For a sophisticated agent, we use a different notion of intra-personal equilibrium from the one employed by Ebert and Strack (2018). We show that any two-threshold strategy, which is to stop when the diffusion process reaches either an upper threshold or a lower threshold, cannot be an intra-personal equilibrium if the agent overweights worst, unlikely outcomes disproportionally. We derive a sufficient and necessary condition for the strategy of stopping everywhere to be an intra-personal equilibrium and show that this condition does not hold and thus the sophisticated agent may choose to start the diffusion process for some commonly used probability weighting functions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Economic Theory publishes original research on economic theory and emphasizes the theoretical analysis of economic models, including the study of related mathematical techniques. JET is the leading journal in economic theory. It is also one of nine core journals in all of economics. Among these journals, the Journal of Economic Theory ranks fourth in impact-adjusted citations.