简化革兰氏阳性水产养殖病原体无乳链球菌的沸腾裂解 DNA 提取过程

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY Archives of Microbiology Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1007/s00203-024-04163-5
Syahir Habib, Mohammad Noor Amal Azmai, Ina-Salwany Md Yasin, Noor Azlina Masdor, Nur Azura Mohd Said, Nur Adeela Yasid
{"title":"简化革兰氏阳性水产养殖病原体无乳链球菌的沸腾裂解 DNA 提取过程","authors":"Syahir Habib,&nbsp;Mohammad Noor Amal Azmai,&nbsp;Ina-Salwany Md Yasin,&nbsp;Noor Azlina Masdor,&nbsp;Nur Azura Mohd Said,&nbsp;Nur Adeela Yasid","doi":"10.1007/s00203-024-04163-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurate genetic analysis is essential for the detection of pathogens as it necessitates suitable DNA extraction methods tailored to specific microorganisms such as Gram-positive bacteria. This study examined several commercial and simplified DNA extraction methods for their suitability in isothermal downstream applications. Extracted DNA was assessed using spectrophotometry, electrophoresis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) while its stability was inspected after five months of storage. The findings revealed variations in DNA yield, purity and integrity among the extraction methods. While extraction kits demonstrated high yield and purity, the in-house extraction techniques showed incoherent correlation between yield and purity, yet showed promise for a streamlined extraction process. The DNA acquired from all methods yielded positive amplification in PCR and LAMP. DNA extracted by kits exhibits prolonged stability than those obtained via boiling lysis. Both methods offer distinct advantages, with commercial kits providing longer stability and high-quality DNA while boiling lysis stands out for its simplicity, with shorter handling and processing periods. This study emphasizes selecting ideal extraction methods for <i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i>, in the prospect of aquaculture settings. In particular, successful LAMP reaction suggests that boiled extracts are feasible enough for detection, and suited for point-of-care (POC) testing where prompt detection of aquatic pathogens is often critical. Ultimately, the choice of method should be contemplated on a case-by-case basis such as the study goals, intended settings, and type of samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8279,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Streamlined boiling lysis DNA extraction for Gram-positive aquaculture pathogen Streptococcus agalactiae\",\"authors\":\"Syahir Habib,&nbsp;Mohammad Noor Amal Azmai,&nbsp;Ina-Salwany Md Yasin,&nbsp;Noor Azlina Masdor,&nbsp;Nur Azura Mohd Said,&nbsp;Nur Adeela Yasid\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00203-024-04163-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Accurate genetic analysis is essential for the detection of pathogens as it necessitates suitable DNA extraction methods tailored to specific microorganisms such as Gram-positive bacteria. This study examined several commercial and simplified DNA extraction methods for their suitability in isothermal downstream applications. Extracted DNA was assessed using spectrophotometry, electrophoresis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) while its stability was inspected after five months of storage. The findings revealed variations in DNA yield, purity and integrity among the extraction methods. While extraction kits demonstrated high yield and purity, the in-house extraction techniques showed incoherent correlation between yield and purity, yet showed promise for a streamlined extraction process. The DNA acquired from all methods yielded positive amplification in PCR and LAMP. DNA extracted by kits exhibits prolonged stability than those obtained via boiling lysis. Both methods offer distinct advantages, with commercial kits providing longer stability and high-quality DNA while boiling lysis stands out for its simplicity, with shorter handling and processing periods. This study emphasizes selecting ideal extraction methods for <i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i>, in the prospect of aquaculture settings. In particular, successful LAMP reaction suggests that boiled extracts are feasible enough for detection, and suited for point-of-care (POC) testing where prompt detection of aquatic pathogens is often critical. Ultimately, the choice of method should be contemplated on a case-by-case basis such as the study goals, intended settings, and type of samples.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00203-024-04163-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00203-024-04163-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确的基因分析对病原体检测至关重要,因为它需要针对特定微生物(如革兰氏阳性菌)量身定制合适的 DNA 提取方法。本研究考察了几种商用和简化 DNA 提取方法在等温下游应用中的适用性。使用分光光度法、电泳、聚合酶链反应(PCR)和环介导等温扩增(LAMP)对提取的 DNA 进行了评估,并在储存五个月后对其稳定性进行了检测。研究结果表明,不同提取方法的 DNA 产量、纯度和完整性存在差异。提取试剂盒显示出较高的产率和纯度,而内部提取技术则显示出产率和纯度之间不一致的相关性,但却显示出简化提取过程的前景。所有方法提取的 DNA 都能在 PCR 和 LAMP 中产生阳性扩增。与沸腾裂解法相比,试剂盒提取的 DNA 具有更长的稳定性。这两种方法都有明显的优势,商业试剂盒可提供更长的稳定性和高质量的 DNA,而沸腾裂解法则因其操作简单、处理和处理时间较短而脱颖而出。本研究强调了在水产养殖环境中选择理想的无乳链球菌提取方法。特别是,LAMP 反应的成功表明,煮沸提取物足以用于检测,并适合于对水生病原体的及时检测至关重要的护理点(POC)检测。最终,应根据研究目标、预期环境和样本类型等具体情况来选择检测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Streamlined boiling lysis DNA extraction for Gram-positive aquaculture pathogen Streptococcus agalactiae

Accurate genetic analysis is essential for the detection of pathogens as it necessitates suitable DNA extraction methods tailored to specific microorganisms such as Gram-positive bacteria. This study examined several commercial and simplified DNA extraction methods for their suitability in isothermal downstream applications. Extracted DNA was assessed using spectrophotometry, electrophoresis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) while its stability was inspected after five months of storage. The findings revealed variations in DNA yield, purity and integrity among the extraction methods. While extraction kits demonstrated high yield and purity, the in-house extraction techniques showed incoherent correlation between yield and purity, yet showed promise for a streamlined extraction process. The DNA acquired from all methods yielded positive amplification in PCR and LAMP. DNA extracted by kits exhibits prolonged stability than those obtained via boiling lysis. Both methods offer distinct advantages, with commercial kits providing longer stability and high-quality DNA while boiling lysis stands out for its simplicity, with shorter handling and processing periods. This study emphasizes selecting ideal extraction methods for Streptococcus agalactiae, in the prospect of aquaculture settings. In particular, successful LAMP reaction suggests that boiled extracts are feasible enough for detection, and suited for point-of-care (POC) testing where prompt detection of aquatic pathogens is often critical. Ultimately, the choice of method should be contemplated on a case-by-case basis such as the study goals, intended settings, and type of samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Microbiology
Archives of Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Research papers must make a significant and original contribution to microbiology and be of interest to a broad readership. The results of any experimental approach that meets these objectives are welcome, particularly biochemical, molecular genetic, physiological, and/or physical investigations into microbial cells and their interactions with their environments, including their eukaryotic hosts. Mini-reviews in areas of special topical interest and papers on medical microbiology, ecology and systematics, including description of novel taxa, are also published. Theoretical papers and those that report on the analysis or ''mining'' of data are acceptable in principle if new information, interpretations, or hypotheses emerge.
期刊最新文献
Construction of engineered probiotic that adhere and display nanobody to neutralize porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus Sublethal injury and recovery of Escherichia coli O157:H7 after dielectric barrier discharge plasma treatment A step-by-step procedure for analysing the 16S rRNA-based microbiome diversity using QIIME 2 and comprehensive PICRUSt2 illustration for functional prediction An improved DNA extraction method in okra for rapid PCR detection of Okra enation leaf curl virus from diverse Indian regions Exploring secretory signal sequences useful in excreting recombinant proteins in Beauveria bassiana as biocontrol fungus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1