Yoshitsugu Obi,Anna Xu,Jonathan A Wilson,Patti L Ephraim,Daniel E Weiner,Julia J Scialla,Bernard G Jaar,L Ebony Boulware,Benjamin Goldstein,Tariq Shafi
{"title":"美国透析患者的心脏性猝死报告:美国透析患者心脏性猝死报告:美国透析患者心脏性猝死报告与全国死亡指数数据的比较。","authors":"Yoshitsugu Obi,Anna Xu,Jonathan A Wilson,Patti L Ephraim,Daniel E Weiner,Julia J Scialla,Bernard G Jaar,L Ebony Boulware,Benjamin Goldstein,Tariq Shafi","doi":"10.2215/cjn.0000000000000560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nCause-specific mortality data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) form the basis for identifying cardiovascular disease (CVD), specifically sudden cardiac death (SCD), as the leading cause of death for patients on dialysis. Death certificate data from the National Death Index (NDI) is the epidemiological standard for assessing causes of death for the United States population. The cause of death has not been compared between the USRDS and the NDI.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAmong 39,507 adults starting dialysis in the US, we identified 6436 patients who died between 2003-2009. We classified the cause of death as SCD, non-SCD CVD, cancer, infection, and others; and compared the USRDS to the NDI.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nMedian age at the time of death was 70 years, 44% were female, and 30% were non-Hispanic Black individuals. The median time from dialysis initiation to death was 1.2 years. Most deaths occurred in-hospital (N=4681, 73%). The overall concordance in cause of death between the two national registries was 42% (κ=0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.24). CVD, including SCD and non-SCD CVD, accounted for 67% of deaths per the USRDS but only 52% per the NDI; this difference was mainly driven by the larger proportion of SCD in the USRDS (42%) versus the NDI (22%). Of the 2962 deaths reported as SCD by the USRDS, only 35% were also classified as SCD by the NDI. Out-of-hospital deaths were more likely to be classified as SCD in the USRDS (60%) versus the NDI (29%), compared to in-hospital deaths (41% in the USRDS; 25% in the NDI).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nSignificant discordance exists in the causes of death for patients on dialysis reported by the USRDS and the NDI. Our findings underscore the urgent need to integrate NDI data into the USRDS registry and enhance the accuracy of cause-of-death reporting.","PeriodicalId":50681,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sudden Cardiac Death Reporting in US Dialysis Patients: Comparison of USRDS and National Death Index Data.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshitsugu Obi,Anna Xu,Jonathan A Wilson,Patti L Ephraim,Daniel E Weiner,Julia J Scialla,Bernard G Jaar,L Ebony Boulware,Benjamin Goldstein,Tariq Shafi\",\"doi\":\"10.2215/cjn.0000000000000560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nCause-specific mortality data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) form the basis for identifying cardiovascular disease (CVD), specifically sudden cardiac death (SCD), as the leading cause of death for patients on dialysis. Death certificate data from the National Death Index (NDI) is the epidemiological standard for assessing causes of death for the United States population. The cause of death has not been compared between the USRDS and the NDI.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nAmong 39,507 adults starting dialysis in the US, we identified 6436 patients who died between 2003-2009. We classified the cause of death as SCD, non-SCD CVD, cancer, infection, and others; and compared the USRDS to the NDI.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nMedian age at the time of death was 70 years, 44% were female, and 30% were non-Hispanic Black individuals. The median time from dialysis initiation to death was 1.2 years. Most deaths occurred in-hospital (N=4681, 73%). The overall concordance in cause of death between the two national registries was 42% (κ=0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.24). CVD, including SCD and non-SCD CVD, accounted for 67% of deaths per the USRDS but only 52% per the NDI; this difference was mainly driven by the larger proportion of SCD in the USRDS (42%) versus the NDI (22%). Of the 2962 deaths reported as SCD by the USRDS, only 35% were also classified as SCD by the NDI. Out-of-hospital deaths were more likely to be classified as SCD in the USRDS (60%) versus the NDI (29%), compared to in-hospital deaths (41% in the USRDS; 25% in the NDI).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nSignificant discordance exists in the causes of death for patients on dialysis reported by the USRDS and the NDI. Our findings underscore the urgent need to integrate NDI data into the USRDS registry and enhance the accuracy of cause-of-death reporting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000000000560\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000000000560","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sudden Cardiac Death Reporting in US Dialysis Patients: Comparison of USRDS and National Death Index Data.
BACKGROUND
Cause-specific mortality data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) form the basis for identifying cardiovascular disease (CVD), specifically sudden cardiac death (SCD), as the leading cause of death for patients on dialysis. Death certificate data from the National Death Index (NDI) is the epidemiological standard for assessing causes of death for the United States population. The cause of death has not been compared between the USRDS and the NDI.
METHODS
Among 39,507 adults starting dialysis in the US, we identified 6436 patients who died between 2003-2009. We classified the cause of death as SCD, non-SCD CVD, cancer, infection, and others; and compared the USRDS to the NDI.
RESULTS
Median age at the time of death was 70 years, 44% were female, and 30% were non-Hispanic Black individuals. The median time from dialysis initiation to death was 1.2 years. Most deaths occurred in-hospital (N=4681, 73%). The overall concordance in cause of death between the two national registries was 42% (κ=0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.24). CVD, including SCD and non-SCD CVD, accounted for 67% of deaths per the USRDS but only 52% per the NDI; this difference was mainly driven by the larger proportion of SCD in the USRDS (42%) versus the NDI (22%). Of the 2962 deaths reported as SCD by the USRDS, only 35% were also classified as SCD by the NDI. Out-of-hospital deaths were more likely to be classified as SCD in the USRDS (60%) versus the NDI (29%), compared to in-hospital deaths (41% in the USRDS; 25% in the NDI).
CONCLUSIONS
Significant discordance exists in the causes of death for patients on dialysis reported by the USRDS and the NDI. Our findings underscore the urgent need to integrate NDI data into the USRDS registry and enhance the accuracy of cause-of-death reporting.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology strives to establish itself as the foremost authority in communicating and influencing advances in clinical nephrology by (1) swiftly and effectively disseminating pivotal developments in clinical and translational research in nephrology, encompassing innovations in research methods and care delivery; (2) providing context for these advances in relation to future research directions and patient care; and (3) becoming a key voice on issues with potential implications for the clinical practice of nephrology, particularly within the United States. Original manuscript topics cover a range of areas, including Acid/Base and Electrolyte Disorders, Acute Kidney Injury and ICU Nephrology, Chronic Kidney Disease, Clinical Nephrology, Cystic Kidney Disease, Diabetes and the Kidney, Genetics, Geriatric and Palliative Nephrology, Glomerular and Tubulointerstitial Diseases, Hypertension, Maintenance Dialysis, Mineral Metabolism, Nephrolithiasis, and Transplantation.