终末期肾病治疗选择模型对肾移植候选名单新增患者的早期影响

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.2215/cjn.0000000000000571
Vishnu S. Potluri, Yuvaram N.V. Reddy, Sri Lekha Tummalapalli, Chen Peng, Qian Huang, Yueming Zhao, Genevieve P. Kanter, Jingsan Zhu, Joshua M. Liao, Amol Navathe
{"title":"终末期肾病治疗选择模型对肾移植候选名单新增患者的早期影响","authors":"Vishnu S. Potluri, Yuvaram N.V. Reddy, Sri Lekha Tummalapalli, Chen Peng, Qian Huang, Yueming Zhao, Genevieve P. Kanter, Jingsan Zhu, Joshua M. Liao, Amol Navathe","doi":"10.2215/cjn.0000000000000571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"odel in 2021, the largest mandatory trial of payment incentives in kidney disease, which randomized 30% of healthcare markets to financial bonuses/penalties to improve kidney transplantation and home dialysis use. This study examines the effect of ETC payment adjustments on US kidney transplant waitlist additions. Methods: Using data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry, we examined kidney transplant waitlisting trends between 01/01/2017 and 06/30/2022. Participants were divided into intervention and control arms of the ETC Model. Using an interrupted time series design, we compared slope changes in waitlist additions post-ETC Model implementation (implementation date: 01/01/2021) between the two arms, while accounting for differential changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results were stratified by race and ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, and other). To examine balance between the two ETC arms, we conducted supplementary analyses using United States Renal Data System and Medicare data. Results: Following implementation of the ETC Model, there were 5,550 waitlist additions in the intervention and 11,332 additions in the control arm (versus 14,023 and 30,610 additions before the ETC Model). Post-ETC, there were no significant differences in kidney transplant waitlist additions between the two arms for the overall cohort (slope difference 6.9 new listings/month, 95% CI: -7.4 to 21.1) or among either White (slope difference 2.6/month, 95% CI -3.0 to 8.1), Black (slope difference 2.2/month, 95% CI: -4.3 to 8.7), or Hispanic (slope difference 0.2/month, 95% CI: -4.5 to 4.9) patients. Conclusions: In the 18 months following implementation, the ETC Model was not associated with significant changes in new kidney transplant waitlist additions. Copyright © 2024 by the American Society of Nephrology...","PeriodicalId":50681,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Effects of the End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices Model on Kidney Transplant Waitlist Additions\",\"authors\":\"Vishnu S. Potluri, Yuvaram N.V. Reddy, Sri Lekha Tummalapalli, Chen Peng, Qian Huang, Yueming Zhao, Genevieve P. Kanter, Jingsan Zhu, Joshua M. Liao, Amol Navathe\",\"doi\":\"10.2215/cjn.0000000000000571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"odel in 2021, the largest mandatory trial of payment incentives in kidney disease, which randomized 30% of healthcare markets to financial bonuses/penalties to improve kidney transplantation and home dialysis use. This study examines the effect of ETC payment adjustments on US kidney transplant waitlist additions. Methods: Using data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry, we examined kidney transplant waitlisting trends between 01/01/2017 and 06/30/2022. Participants were divided into intervention and control arms of the ETC Model. Using an interrupted time series design, we compared slope changes in waitlist additions post-ETC Model implementation (implementation date: 01/01/2021) between the two arms, while accounting for differential changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results were stratified by race and ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, and other). To examine balance between the two ETC arms, we conducted supplementary analyses using United States Renal Data System and Medicare data. Results: Following implementation of the ETC Model, there were 5,550 waitlist additions in the intervention and 11,332 additions in the control arm (versus 14,023 and 30,610 additions before the ETC Model). Post-ETC, there were no significant differences in kidney transplant waitlist additions between the two arms for the overall cohort (slope difference 6.9 new listings/month, 95% CI: -7.4 to 21.1) or among either White (slope difference 2.6/month, 95% CI -3.0 to 8.1), Black (slope difference 2.2/month, 95% CI: -4.3 to 8.7), or Hispanic (slope difference 0.2/month, 95% CI: -4.5 to 4.9) patients. Conclusions: In the 18 months following implementation, the ETC Model was not associated with significant changes in new kidney transplant waitlist additions. Copyright © 2024 by the American Society of Nephrology...\",\"PeriodicalId\":50681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000000000571\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000000000571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该试验将 30% 的医疗市场随机分配给经济奖励/惩罚,以提高肾移植和家庭透析的使用率。本研究探讨了 ETC 支付调整对美国肾移植等待者增加的影响。方法:利用器官获取和移植网络登记处的数据,我们研究了 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间肾移植等待名单的趋势。参与者被分为 ETC 模型的干预组和对照组。我们采用间断时间序列设计,比较了 ETC 模式实施后(实施日期:2021 年 1 月 1 日)两组之间候选名单新增人数的斜率变化,同时考虑了 COVID-19 大流行期间的不同变化。结果按种族和民族(白人、黑人、西班牙裔和其他)进行了分层。为了检查两个 ETC 治疗组之间的平衡情况,我们使用美国肾脏数据系统和医疗保险数据进行了补充分析。结果:ETC 模式实施后,干预组和对照组分别增加了 5550 人和 11332 人(ETC 模式实施前分别增加了 14023 人和 30610 人)。ETC 结束后,在整个队列(斜率差异为 6.9 个新病例/月,95% CI:-7.4 到 21.1)或白人(斜率差异为 6.9 个新病例/月,95% CI:-7.4 到 21.1)中,两组之间的肾移植候选名单新增人数没有显著差异。1)或白人患者(斜率差异为 2.6/月,95% CI -3.0-8.1)、黑人患者(斜率差异为 2.2/月,95% CI:-4.3-8.7)或西班牙裔患者(斜率差异为 0.2/月,95% CI:-4.5-4.9)之间均无显著差异。结论:在实施后的 18 个月内,ETC 模型与肾移植候选名单上新增患者的显著变化无关。版权所有 © 2024 年美国肾脏病学会...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early Effects of the End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices Model on Kidney Transplant Waitlist Additions
odel in 2021, the largest mandatory trial of payment incentives in kidney disease, which randomized 30% of healthcare markets to financial bonuses/penalties to improve kidney transplantation and home dialysis use. This study examines the effect of ETC payment adjustments on US kidney transplant waitlist additions. Methods: Using data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry, we examined kidney transplant waitlisting trends between 01/01/2017 and 06/30/2022. Participants were divided into intervention and control arms of the ETC Model. Using an interrupted time series design, we compared slope changes in waitlist additions post-ETC Model implementation (implementation date: 01/01/2021) between the two arms, while accounting for differential changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results were stratified by race and ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, and other). To examine balance between the two ETC arms, we conducted supplementary analyses using United States Renal Data System and Medicare data. Results: Following implementation of the ETC Model, there were 5,550 waitlist additions in the intervention and 11,332 additions in the control arm (versus 14,023 and 30,610 additions before the ETC Model). Post-ETC, there were no significant differences in kidney transplant waitlist additions between the two arms for the overall cohort (slope difference 6.9 new listings/month, 95% CI: -7.4 to 21.1) or among either White (slope difference 2.6/month, 95% CI -3.0 to 8.1), Black (slope difference 2.2/month, 95% CI: -4.3 to 8.7), or Hispanic (slope difference 0.2/month, 95% CI: -4.5 to 4.9) patients. Conclusions: In the 18 months following implementation, the ETC Model was not associated with significant changes in new kidney transplant waitlist additions. Copyright © 2024 by the American Society of Nephrology...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology strives to establish itself as the foremost authority in communicating and influencing advances in clinical nephrology by (1) swiftly and effectively disseminating pivotal developments in clinical and translational research in nephrology, encompassing innovations in research methods and care delivery; (2) providing context for these advances in relation to future research directions and patient care; and (3) becoming a key voice on issues with potential implications for the clinical practice of nephrology, particularly within the United States. Original manuscript topics cover a range of areas, including Acid/Base and Electrolyte Disorders, Acute Kidney Injury and ICU Nephrology, Chronic Kidney Disease, Clinical Nephrology, Cystic Kidney Disease, Diabetes and the Kidney, Genetics, Geriatric and Palliative Nephrology, Glomerular and Tubulointerstitial Diseases, Hypertension, Maintenance Dialysis, Mineral Metabolism, Nephrolithiasis, and Transplantation.
期刊最新文献
Bisphosphonate Use After Kidney Transplantation Is Associated with Lower Fracture Risk. Surrogate Endpoints in APOL1-Associated Kidney Disease: Evaluation in Three Cohorts. From Home to Wearable Hemodialysis: Barriers, Progress, and Opportunities. Potential Role of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Nondiabetic Chronic Kidney Disease and Glomerular Disease. Exercise and Cognitive Function in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Harms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1