Andreas Mühlbauer, Dominik Keiner and Christian Breyer
{"title":"固体碳酸盐中永久封存二氧化碳的技术经济见解和应用前景","authors":"Andreas Mühlbauer, Dominik Keiner and Christian Breyer","doi":"10.1039/D4EE03166K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >While a rapid defossilisation of the energy-industry system is at the highest priority for climate change mitigation, additional post-fossil carbon dioxide removal (CDR) for net-negative emissions will likely be necessary to ensure a safe future. An in-depth techno-economic analysis of differentiated sequestration options for carbon dioxide (CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>) in solid carbonates is not yet available, as direct air capture-based mineralisation is usually aggregated in direct air capture and carbon sequestration. This research gap is closed by studying mineralisation as a key CDR option to sequester atmospheric CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> permanently, based on available literature. The most frequently discussed routes for mineralisation, <em>i.e.</em>, <em>in situ</em>, <em>ex situ</em> mineralisation, and enhanced rock weathering, are examined. The deployment potentials of these options are determined globally for nine major regions. Results indicate that costs for all mineralisation options can be kept below 100 € per tCO<small><sub>2</sub></small> from 2050. From 2030 onwards, <em>in situ</em> mineralisation, with low energy-intensity, can be realised at cost of ≤131 € per tCO<small><sub>2</sub></small>, <em>ex situ</em> mineralisation at ≤189 € per tCO<small><sub>2</sub></small>, and enhanced weathering at ≤88 € per tCO<small><sub>2</sub></small>. Final energy demand for CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> sequestration <em>via in situ</em> mineralisation is ≤1.8 MWh per tCO<small><sub>2</sub></small>, <em>via ex situ</em> mineralisation ≤3.7 MWh per tCO<small><sub>2</sub></small>, and <em>via</em> enhanced weathering ≤1.1 MWh per tCO<small><sub>2</sub></small> from 2030. Large-scale deployment of mineralisation options supporting 60% of projected CDR demand is assessed to require up to 0.06% and 0.21% in global gross domestic product and up to 2.5% and 8.6% additional primary energy demand in 2070 for a 1.5 °C and 1.0 °C climate target, respectively. Implications, permanence of sequestration, and limitations are discussed, and a research outlook is provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":72,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environmental Science","volume":" 22","pages":" 8756-8775"},"PeriodicalIF":32.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/ee/d4ee03166k?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-economic insights and deployment prospects of permanent carbon dioxide sequestration in solid carbonates†\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Mühlbauer, Dominik Keiner and Christian Breyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4EE03166K\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >While a rapid defossilisation of the energy-industry system is at the highest priority for climate change mitigation, additional post-fossil carbon dioxide removal (CDR) for net-negative emissions will likely be necessary to ensure a safe future. An in-depth techno-economic analysis of differentiated sequestration options for carbon dioxide (CO<small><sub>2</sub></small>) in solid carbonates is not yet available, as direct air capture-based mineralisation is usually aggregated in direct air capture and carbon sequestration. This research gap is closed by studying mineralisation as a key CDR option to sequester atmospheric CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> permanently, based on available literature. The most frequently discussed routes for mineralisation, <em>i.e.</em>, <em>in situ</em>, <em>ex situ</em> mineralisation, and enhanced rock weathering, are examined. The deployment potentials of these options are determined globally for nine major regions. Results indicate that costs for all mineralisation options can be kept below 100 € per tCO<small><sub>2</sub></small> from 2050. From 2030 onwards, <em>in situ</em> mineralisation, with low energy-intensity, can be realised at cost of ≤131 € per tCO<small><sub>2</sub></small>, <em>ex situ</em> mineralisation at ≤189 € per tCO<small><sub>2</sub></small>, and enhanced weathering at ≤88 € per tCO<small><sub>2</sub></small>. Final energy demand for CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> sequestration <em>via in situ</em> mineralisation is ≤1.8 MWh per tCO<small><sub>2</sub></small>, <em>via ex situ</em> mineralisation ≤3.7 MWh per tCO<small><sub>2</sub></small>, and <em>via</em> enhanced weathering ≤1.1 MWh per tCO<small><sub>2</sub></small> from 2030. Large-scale deployment of mineralisation options supporting 60% of projected CDR demand is assessed to require up to 0.06% and 0.21% in global gross domestic product and up to 2.5% and 8.6% additional primary energy demand in 2070 for a 1.5 °C and 1.0 °C climate target, respectively. Implications, permanence of sequestration, and limitations are discussed, and a research outlook is provided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Environmental Science\",\"volume\":\" 22\",\"pages\":\" 8756-8775\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":32.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/ee/d4ee03166k?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Environmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ee/d4ee03166k\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ee/d4ee03166k","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Techno-economic insights and deployment prospects of permanent carbon dioxide sequestration in solid carbonates†
While a rapid defossilisation of the energy-industry system is at the highest priority for climate change mitigation, additional post-fossil carbon dioxide removal (CDR) for net-negative emissions will likely be necessary to ensure a safe future. An in-depth techno-economic analysis of differentiated sequestration options for carbon dioxide (CO2) in solid carbonates is not yet available, as direct air capture-based mineralisation is usually aggregated in direct air capture and carbon sequestration. This research gap is closed by studying mineralisation as a key CDR option to sequester atmospheric CO2 permanently, based on available literature. The most frequently discussed routes for mineralisation, i.e., in situ, ex situ mineralisation, and enhanced rock weathering, are examined. The deployment potentials of these options are determined globally for nine major regions. Results indicate that costs for all mineralisation options can be kept below 100 € per tCO2 from 2050. From 2030 onwards, in situ mineralisation, with low energy-intensity, can be realised at cost of ≤131 € per tCO2, ex situ mineralisation at ≤189 € per tCO2, and enhanced weathering at ≤88 € per tCO2. Final energy demand for CO2 sequestration via in situ mineralisation is ≤1.8 MWh per tCO2, via ex situ mineralisation ≤3.7 MWh per tCO2, and via enhanced weathering ≤1.1 MWh per tCO2 from 2030. Large-scale deployment of mineralisation options supporting 60% of projected CDR demand is assessed to require up to 0.06% and 0.21% in global gross domestic product and up to 2.5% and 8.6% additional primary energy demand in 2070 for a 1.5 °C and 1.0 °C climate target, respectively. Implications, permanence of sequestration, and limitations are discussed, and a research outlook is provided.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Environmental Science, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, publishes original research and review articles covering interdisciplinary topics in the (bio)chemical and (bio)physical sciences, as well as chemical engineering disciplines. Published monthly by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), a not-for-profit publisher, Energy & Environmental Science is recognized as a leading journal. It boasts an impressive impact factor of 8.500 as of 2009, ranking 8th among 140 journals in the category "Chemistry, Multidisciplinary," second among 71 journals in "Energy & Fuels," second among 128 journals in "Engineering, Chemical," and first among 181 scientific journals in "Environmental Sciences."
Energy & Environmental Science publishes various types of articles, including Research Papers (original scientific work), Review Articles, Perspectives, and Minireviews (feature review-type articles of broad interest), Communications (original scientific work of an urgent nature), Opinions (personal, often speculative viewpoints or hypotheses on current topics), and Analysis Articles (in-depth examination of energy-related issues).