实现地方可持续性:中介机构如何促进社会创新

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123790
Romain Slitine , Didier Chabaud , Nadine Richez-Battesti
{"title":"实现地方可持续性:中介机构如何促进社会创新","authors":"Romain Slitine ,&nbsp;Didier Chabaud ,&nbsp;Nadine Richez-Battesti","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The concept of social innovation has received considerable interest in recent years, both in research and policy. One of the main challenges lies in understanding how to move from experimentation to spreading social innovation and bringing it to widespread use. This is how concrete objectives for sustainable development can be achieved in a given territory. Intermediation plays an essential<!--> <!-->but little-studied role in the spread of social innovation. In this study, we endeavoured to understand how the social innovation intermediation process is constructed and its effects. We interconnected the actor-network theory and <em>middleground</em> approach to separate the practices and dynamics at work in an emblematic case: the <em>Start-Up de Territoire</em> (in France). By entering the ‘black box’ of the social innovation factory, we observed how the role of social innovation intermediary is built gradually over time. We then identified three main social innovation intermediation processes that condition its scale-up: building the vision of the territory, expanding the network, and defining how the different levels interrelate by distinguishing between top-down and bottom-up translations.</div><div>Our analysis contributes to the literature on social innovation by providing an interpretative framework to understand how intermediation dynamics interrelate at different levels. This contribution thus makes it possible to strengthen the theoretical foundation of social innovation and explore the connection between social innovation and transformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 123790"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards local sustainability: How intermediation fosters social innovation\",\"authors\":\"Romain Slitine ,&nbsp;Didier Chabaud ,&nbsp;Nadine Richez-Battesti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The concept of social innovation has received considerable interest in recent years, both in research and policy. One of the main challenges lies in understanding how to move from experimentation to spreading social innovation and bringing it to widespread use. This is how concrete objectives for sustainable development can be achieved in a given territory. Intermediation plays an essential<!--> <!-->but little-studied role in the spread of social innovation. In this study, we endeavoured to understand how the social innovation intermediation process is constructed and its effects. We interconnected the actor-network theory and <em>middleground</em> approach to separate the practices and dynamics at work in an emblematic case: the <em>Start-Up de Territoire</em> (in France). By entering the ‘black box’ of the social innovation factory, we observed how the role of social innovation intermediary is built gradually over time. We then identified three main social innovation intermediation processes that condition its scale-up: building the vision of the territory, expanding the network, and defining how the different levels interrelate by distinguishing between top-down and bottom-up translations.</div><div>Our analysis contributes to the literature on social innovation by providing an interpretative framework to understand how intermediation dynamics interrelate at different levels. This contribution thus makes it possible to strengthen the theoretical foundation of social innovation and explore the connection between social innovation and transformation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524005882\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524005882","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,社会创新的概念在研究和政策方面都受到了广泛关注。主要挑战之一在于了解如何从实验走向推广社会创新并使其得到广泛应用。这就是如何在特定地区实现可持续发展的具体目标。中介在社会创新的传播过程中发挥着至关重要的作用,但却鲜有研究。在这项研究中,我们努力了解社会创新中介过程的构建方式及其影响。我们将行动者网络理论和中间环节方法结合起来,将一个具有代表性的案例--Start-Up de Territoire(法国)--中的实践和动力分离开来。通过进入社会创新工厂的 "黑盒子",我们观察到社会创新中介的角色是如何随着时间的推移逐渐形成的。然后,我们确定了制约其规模扩大的三大社会创新中介过程:建立地区愿景、扩大网络,以及通过区分自上而下和自下而上的翻译来定义不同层次之间的相互关系。我们的分析提供了一个解释性框架,以了解中介动态如何在不同层面上相互关联,从而为社会创新方面的文献做出了贡献。因此,这一贡献使得加强社会创新的理论基础和探索社会创新与转型之间的联系成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards local sustainability: How intermediation fosters social innovation
The concept of social innovation has received considerable interest in recent years, both in research and policy. One of the main challenges lies in understanding how to move from experimentation to spreading social innovation and bringing it to widespread use. This is how concrete objectives for sustainable development can be achieved in a given territory. Intermediation plays an essential but little-studied role in the spread of social innovation. In this study, we endeavoured to understand how the social innovation intermediation process is constructed and its effects. We interconnected the actor-network theory and middleground approach to separate the practices and dynamics at work in an emblematic case: the Start-Up de Territoire (in France). By entering the ‘black box’ of the social innovation factory, we observed how the role of social innovation intermediary is built gradually over time. We then identified three main social innovation intermediation processes that condition its scale-up: building the vision of the territory, expanding the network, and defining how the different levels interrelate by distinguishing between top-down and bottom-up translations.
Our analysis contributes to the literature on social innovation by providing an interpretative framework to understand how intermediation dynamics interrelate at different levels. This contribution thus makes it possible to strengthen the theoretical foundation of social innovation and explore the connection between social innovation and transformation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
Roles of related and unrelated external technologies in shaping regional breakthrough technological advantages Standardization and Standards: Safeguards of Technological Sovereignty? Understanding service robot adoption and resistance from a service provider perspective Examining trust in cryptocurrency investment: Insights from the structural equation modeling Enabling a viable circular ecosystem for electric vehicle batteries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1