土工聚合物粘结剂和再生粗集料对混凝土砌体性能的协同影响

Elen Abuowda, Hilal El-Hassan, Tamer El-Maaddawy
{"title":"土工聚合物粘结剂和再生粗集料对混凝土砌体性能的协同影响","authors":"Elen Abuowda,&nbsp;Hilal El-Hassan,&nbsp;Tamer El-Maaddawy","doi":"10.1016/j.clema.2024.100272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the combined effect of geopolymeric binder and recycled coarse aggregates (RCA) on the properties of concrete masonry units (CMU). A target 1-day compressive strength of at least 13.8 MPa was attained for all mixes to satisfy the load-bearing strength requirements. Geopolymer mixes made with RCA at replacement rates of up to 100 % were evaluated and compared to a cementitious control mix made with natural coarse aggregates. The environmental and economic impacts were then integrated with the quantity of waste valorized and compressive strength in a multifunctional performance index. Experimental results showed that the utilization of geopolymers as a substitute for Portland cement in the production of CMU did not impact the oven-dry density but reduced the water absorption capacity by up to 26 %. Although the incorporation of RCA negatively impacted these two properties, their values remained within the acceptable range stated by the standards. The geopolymer CMU mix made without RCA had 9 and 25 % lower 28-day compressive and splitting tensile strengths compared to the cement control mix, respectively. Subsequent RCA replacement further reduced these mechanical properties. While the linear drying shrinkage was reduced upon substituting the cementitious binder with the geopolymeric counterpart, RCA replacement of up to 100 % increased the linear drying shrinkage to reach 0.091 %, exceeding the limit set by the standard. Overall, the CMU mix made with geopolymer binder and 75–100 % RCA was found to be optimal for load-bearing applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100254,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Materials","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergistic impact of geopolymer binder and recycled coarse aggregates on the performance of concrete masonry units\",\"authors\":\"Elen Abuowda,&nbsp;Hilal El-Hassan,&nbsp;Tamer El-Maaddawy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clema.2024.100272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the combined effect of geopolymeric binder and recycled coarse aggregates (RCA) on the properties of concrete masonry units (CMU). A target 1-day compressive strength of at least 13.8 MPa was attained for all mixes to satisfy the load-bearing strength requirements. Geopolymer mixes made with RCA at replacement rates of up to 100 % were evaluated and compared to a cementitious control mix made with natural coarse aggregates. The environmental and economic impacts were then integrated with the quantity of waste valorized and compressive strength in a multifunctional performance index. Experimental results showed that the utilization of geopolymers as a substitute for Portland cement in the production of CMU did not impact the oven-dry density but reduced the water absorption capacity by up to 26 %. Although the incorporation of RCA negatively impacted these two properties, their values remained within the acceptable range stated by the standards. The geopolymer CMU mix made without RCA had 9 and 25 % lower 28-day compressive and splitting tensile strengths compared to the cement control mix, respectively. Subsequent RCA replacement further reduced these mechanical properties. While the linear drying shrinkage was reduced upon substituting the cementitious binder with the geopolymeric counterpart, RCA replacement of up to 100 % increased the linear drying shrinkage to reach 0.091 %, exceeding the limit set by the standard. Overall, the CMU mix made with geopolymer binder and 75–100 % RCA was found to be optimal for load-bearing applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Materials\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277239762400056X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277239762400056X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了土工聚合物粘结剂和再生粗集料(RCA)对混凝土砌体单元(CMU)性能的综合影响。所有混合料的 1 天抗压强度目标值至少为 13.8 兆帕,以满足承重强度要求。对使用 RCA(替代率高达 100%)制成的土工聚合物混合料进行了评估,并与使用天然粗集料制成的水泥基对照混合料进行了比较。然后将对环境和经济的影响与废弃物利用率和抗压强度纳入多功能性能指标。实验结果表明,使用土工聚合物替代硅酸盐水泥生产 CMU 不会影响烘干密度,但会降低吸水能力达 26%。虽然掺入 RCA 会对这两项性能产生负面影响,但其值仍在标准规定的可接受范围内。与水泥对照混合料相比,未添加 RCA 的土工聚合物 CMU 混合料的 28 天抗压强度和劈裂拉伸强度分别降低了 9% 和 25%。随后添加的 RCA 进一步降低了这些机械性能。用土工聚合物替代水泥基粘结剂后,线性干燥收缩率降低了,但 RCA 替代率高达 100%,线性干燥收缩率增加到 0.091%,超过了标准规定的限度。总体而言,使用土工聚合物粘结剂和 75% 至 100% 的 RCA 制成的 CMU 混合料最适合用于承重应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Synergistic impact of geopolymer binder and recycled coarse aggregates on the performance of concrete masonry units
This study examines the combined effect of geopolymeric binder and recycled coarse aggregates (RCA) on the properties of concrete masonry units (CMU). A target 1-day compressive strength of at least 13.8 MPa was attained for all mixes to satisfy the load-bearing strength requirements. Geopolymer mixes made with RCA at replacement rates of up to 100 % were evaluated and compared to a cementitious control mix made with natural coarse aggregates. The environmental and economic impacts were then integrated with the quantity of waste valorized and compressive strength in a multifunctional performance index. Experimental results showed that the utilization of geopolymers as a substitute for Portland cement in the production of CMU did not impact the oven-dry density but reduced the water absorption capacity by up to 26 %. Although the incorporation of RCA negatively impacted these two properties, their values remained within the acceptable range stated by the standards. The geopolymer CMU mix made without RCA had 9 and 25 % lower 28-day compressive and splitting tensile strengths compared to the cement control mix, respectively. Subsequent RCA replacement further reduced these mechanical properties. While the linear drying shrinkage was reduced upon substituting the cementitious binder with the geopolymeric counterpart, RCA replacement of up to 100 % increased the linear drying shrinkage to reach 0.091 %, exceeding the limit set by the standard. Overall, the CMU mix made with geopolymer binder and 75–100 % RCA was found to be optimal for load-bearing applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of the influence of crushed sand on carbonation of Mortar: Physical and microstructural analysis Biodegradable natural polymers and fibers for 3D printing: A holistic perspective on processing, characterization, and advanced applications Experimental study of phase change material (PCM) biochar composite for net-zero built environment applications Research trends on thermochromic asphalt mixtures functionalization: Bibliometric analysis and review Synergistic impact of geopolymer binder and recycled coarse aggregates on the performance of concrete masonry units
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1