参与金融科技生态系统的普惠金融效应

IF 4.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Economics & Finance Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.iref.2024.103671
Odongo Kodongo
{"title":"参与金融科技生态系统的普惠金融效应","authors":"Odongo Kodongo","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2024.103671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using the FinAccess Kenya Household Survey dataset, we construct a metric of individual engagement with the fintech ecosystem and examine its linkage with consumption of traditional financial products. Deploying a battery of econometric procedures, we document a pervasive gap in the usage of traditional financial products, ranging from 5.3% to 17.5%, between individuals who engage with the fintech ecosystem and those who do not. Treatment-effects procedures yield evidence that engaging with the fintech ecosystem improves individuals’ usage of traditional financial products by about 4 percentage points. The positive impact of the fintech ecosystem on the usage of traditional financial products is enabled by fintech mitigating the distance barrier. Interestingly, our findings suggest that the fintech ecosystem does not perform well in addressing financial inclusion inequalities facing young adults, women, the less educated and less wealthy people. We offer policy guides and future research suggestions anchored on these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 103671"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial inclusion effects of engaging with the fintech ecosystem\",\"authors\":\"Odongo Kodongo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iref.2024.103671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using the FinAccess Kenya Household Survey dataset, we construct a metric of individual engagement with the fintech ecosystem and examine its linkage with consumption of traditional financial products. Deploying a battery of econometric procedures, we document a pervasive gap in the usage of traditional financial products, ranging from 5.3% to 17.5%, between individuals who engage with the fintech ecosystem and those who do not. Treatment-effects procedures yield evidence that engaging with the fintech ecosystem improves individuals’ usage of traditional financial products by about 4 percentage points. The positive impact of the fintech ecosystem on the usage of traditional financial products is enabled by fintech mitigating the distance barrier. Interestingly, our findings suggest that the fintech ecosystem does not perform well in addressing financial inclusion inequalities facing young adults, women, the less educated and less wealthy people. We offer policy guides and future research suggestions anchored on these findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024006634\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024006634","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用肯尼亚家庭调查 FinAccess 数据集,构建了个人参与金融科技生态系统的指标,并研究了其与传统金融产品消费之间的联系。通过一系列计量经济学程序,我们记录了参与金融科技生态系统的个人与未参与的个人之间在传统金融产品使用方面普遍存在的差距,差距从 5.3% 到 17.5%不等。处理效应程序得出的证据表明,参与金融科技生态系统可将个人对传统金融产品的使用率提高约 4 个百分点。金融科技生态系统对传统金融产品使用率的积极影响得益于金融科技缓解了距离障碍。有趣的是,我们的研究结果表明,金融科技生态系统在解决青壮年、女性、受教育程度较低和较不富裕人群所面临的金融包容性不平等方面表现不佳。我们根据这些发现提出了政策指南和未来研究建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Financial inclusion effects of engaging with the fintech ecosystem
Using the FinAccess Kenya Household Survey dataset, we construct a metric of individual engagement with the fintech ecosystem and examine its linkage with consumption of traditional financial products. Deploying a battery of econometric procedures, we document a pervasive gap in the usage of traditional financial products, ranging from 5.3% to 17.5%, between individuals who engage with the fintech ecosystem and those who do not. Treatment-effects procedures yield evidence that engaging with the fintech ecosystem improves individuals’ usage of traditional financial products by about 4 percentage points. The positive impact of the fintech ecosystem on the usage of traditional financial products is enabled by fintech mitigating the distance barrier. Interestingly, our findings suggest that the fintech ecosystem does not perform well in addressing financial inclusion inequalities facing young adults, women, the less educated and less wealthy people. We offer policy guides and future research suggestions anchored on these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
期刊最新文献
The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance Can long-term institutional owners improve market efficiency in parsing complex legal disputes? How does data factor utilization stimulate corporate total factor productivity: A discussion of the productivity paradox The local government fiscal pressure's effect on green total factor productivity: Exploring mechanisms from the perspective of government behavior Big data development and enterprise green innovation: Text analysis of listed companies’ annual reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1