Michael P. Brandon , Mark Cummins , Peter Deeney , Mary T. Pryce
{"title":"利用实际备选方案评估二氧化碳光化学利用技术","authors":"Michael P. Brandon , Mark Cummins , Peter Deeney , Mary T. Pryce","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2024.103994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nascent carbon capture and utilisation technologies that transform captured <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>CO</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions into a usable chemical product, provide alternatives to carbon capture and storage. Technology risk, and associated investment uncertainty, are barriers to the development of such technologies. In view of this, we consider a flexible real options framework to assess the technology risk inherent in photochemical carbon dioxide reduction technologies, a low readiness level technology (TRL 2–4) that utilises an artificial photosynthesis system based on natural or artificial light. We consider two competing configurations, both of which produce carbon monoxide but differ in the light source for the artificial photosynthesis system. One configuration uses intense UV lamps, while the other uses ambient light with a solar concentrator. After establishing literature informed cost estimates for pilot plant specifications, we conduct a sensitivity analysis across select physical attributes, technological development characteristics and price exposures. We confirm high sensitivity to the efficiency of the CO production process. Cost sensitivities are also evidenced for the catalyst, the running of the UV lamps in the first configuration and the solar concentrator in the second configuration. Price sensitivity is highest for the CO produced. Our study is relevant for project developers considering investment in research for this nascent technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 103994"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of photochemical carbon dioxide utilisation technologies using real options\",\"authors\":\"Michael P. Brandon , Mark Cummins , Peter Deeney , Mary T. Pryce\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.seta.2024.103994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nascent carbon capture and utilisation technologies that transform captured <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>CO</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions into a usable chemical product, provide alternatives to carbon capture and storage. Technology risk, and associated investment uncertainty, are barriers to the development of such technologies. In view of this, we consider a flexible real options framework to assess the technology risk inherent in photochemical carbon dioxide reduction technologies, a low readiness level technology (TRL 2–4) that utilises an artificial photosynthesis system based on natural or artificial light. We consider two competing configurations, both of which produce carbon monoxide but differ in the light source for the artificial photosynthesis system. One configuration uses intense UV lamps, while the other uses ambient light with a solar concentrator. After establishing literature informed cost estimates for pilot plant specifications, we conduct a sensitivity analysis across select physical attributes, technological development characteristics and price exposures. We confirm high sensitivity to the efficiency of the CO production process. Cost sensitivities are also evidenced for the catalyst, the running of the UV lamps in the first configuration and the solar concentrator in the second configuration. Price sensitivity is highest for the CO produced. Our study is relevant for project developers considering investment in research for this nascent technology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103994\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138824003904\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138824003904","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
An assessment of photochemical carbon dioxide utilisation technologies using real options
Nascent carbon capture and utilisation technologies that transform captured emissions into a usable chemical product, provide alternatives to carbon capture and storage. Technology risk, and associated investment uncertainty, are barriers to the development of such technologies. In view of this, we consider a flexible real options framework to assess the technology risk inherent in photochemical carbon dioxide reduction technologies, a low readiness level technology (TRL 2–4) that utilises an artificial photosynthesis system based on natural or artificial light. We consider two competing configurations, both of which produce carbon monoxide but differ in the light source for the artificial photosynthesis system. One configuration uses intense UV lamps, while the other uses ambient light with a solar concentrator. After establishing literature informed cost estimates for pilot plant specifications, we conduct a sensitivity analysis across select physical attributes, technological development characteristics and price exposures. We confirm high sensitivity to the efficiency of the CO production process. Cost sensitivities are also evidenced for the catalyst, the running of the UV lamps in the first configuration and the solar concentrator in the second configuration. Price sensitivity is highest for the CO produced. Our study is relevant for project developers considering investment in research for this nascent technology.
期刊介绍:
Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.