农业粮食系统中应用系统动力学建模的方法规范元网络分析

IF 3 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Futures Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2024.103484
J. Aboah , M.M.J. Wilson , K. Bicknell , E.D. Setsoafia
{"title":"农业粮食系统中应用系统动力学建模的方法规范元网络分析","authors":"J. Aboah ,&nbsp;M.M.J. Wilson ,&nbsp;K. Bicknell ,&nbsp;E.D. Setsoafia","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper aims to review existing applications of system dynamics modelling in agricultural food systems and draw insights from the various modelling procedures in order to highlight best-practice guidelines on methodological specifications for SD modelling. A meta-network analysis was used to identify existing studies that have applied SD modelling in agriculture. Using an algorithm that automatically clusters closely connected research articles based on Boolean search strings that look at the title, keywords, abstract, and digital object identifier (DOI) of the journal articles, 354 journal articles were selected for in-depth content analysis.</div><div>Based on the synthesised trends, two criteria for determining the type of modelling process and model type to apply for the model conceptualisation step are: (<em>i</em>) the immediate end goal of the modelling process, and (<em>ii</em>) data availability. Participatory modelling is appropriate when there is limited data and model outputs will inform the implementation of interventions by stakeholders. For action research focusing on well-researched food systems with substantial data available, the semi-participatory modelling process can be adopted, and quantitative SD models can be solitarily used. A key contribution of this paper is the proposed procedure for emergent participatory scenario development within the system dynamics modelling process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-network analysis of methodological specifications for system dynamics modelling application in agricultural food systems\",\"authors\":\"J. Aboah ,&nbsp;M.M.J. Wilson ,&nbsp;K. Bicknell ,&nbsp;E.D. Setsoafia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper aims to review existing applications of system dynamics modelling in agricultural food systems and draw insights from the various modelling procedures in order to highlight best-practice guidelines on methodological specifications for SD modelling. A meta-network analysis was used to identify existing studies that have applied SD modelling in agriculture. Using an algorithm that automatically clusters closely connected research articles based on Boolean search strings that look at the title, keywords, abstract, and digital object identifier (DOI) of the journal articles, 354 journal articles were selected for in-depth content analysis.</div><div>Based on the synthesised trends, two criteria for determining the type of modelling process and model type to apply for the model conceptualisation step are: (<em>i</em>) the immediate end goal of the modelling process, and (<em>ii</em>) data availability. Participatory modelling is appropriate when there is limited data and model outputs will inform the implementation of interventions by stakeholders. For action research focusing on well-researched food systems with substantial data available, the semi-participatory modelling process can be adopted, and quantitative SD models can be solitarily used. A key contribution of this paper is the proposed procedure for emergent participatory scenario development within the system dynamics modelling process.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Futures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724001678\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724001678","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在回顾系统动力学建模在农业粮食系统中的现有应用,并从各种建模程序中汲取启示,以强调可持续发展建模方法规范的最佳实践指南。本文采用元网络分析来确定农业中应用可持续发展建模的现有研究。根据综合趋势,确定模型概念化步骤所应用的建模过程类型和模型类型的两个标准是:(i) 模型概念化步骤的直接最终目标;(ii) 模型概念化步骤所应用的建模过程类型和模型类型;(iii) 模型概念化步骤所应用的建模过程类型和模型类型;(iv) 模型概念化步骤所应用的建模过程类型和模型类型:(i) 建模过程的直接最终目标,以及 (ii) 数据的可用性。参与式建模适用于数据有限,且模型输出结果将为利益相关者实施干预措施提供信息的情况。如果行动研究的重点是经过充分研究并拥有大量数据的粮食系统,则可以采用半参与式建模过程,并单独使用定量可持续发展模型。本文的一个主要贡献是提出了在系统动力学建模过程中进行新兴参与式情景开发的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A meta-network analysis of methodological specifications for system dynamics modelling application in agricultural food systems
This paper aims to review existing applications of system dynamics modelling in agricultural food systems and draw insights from the various modelling procedures in order to highlight best-practice guidelines on methodological specifications for SD modelling. A meta-network analysis was used to identify existing studies that have applied SD modelling in agriculture. Using an algorithm that automatically clusters closely connected research articles based on Boolean search strings that look at the title, keywords, abstract, and digital object identifier (DOI) of the journal articles, 354 journal articles were selected for in-depth content analysis.
Based on the synthesised trends, two criteria for determining the type of modelling process and model type to apply for the model conceptualisation step are: (i) the immediate end goal of the modelling process, and (ii) data availability. Participatory modelling is appropriate when there is limited data and model outputs will inform the implementation of interventions by stakeholders. For action research focusing on well-researched food systems with substantial data available, the semi-participatory modelling process can be adopted, and quantitative SD models can be solitarily used. A key contribution of this paper is the proposed procedure for emergent participatory scenario development within the system dynamics modelling process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Futures
Futures Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures
期刊最新文献
The politics of transdisciplinary research on societal transitions Narratives, expectations, and policy criteria for a democratic and socially engaging energy transition Exploring urban novel ecosystems: Understandings, insights and recommendations for future research and practice Future cities' theories for sustainable future: A systematic literature review Planetary scale climatic change through bioengineering the microbial world. A technofix imaginary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1