Rukayya Ibrahim Muazu , Polina Yaseneva , Nilay Shah , Maria-Magdalena Titirici
{"title":"生物衍生先进材料生命周期可持续性评估:最新综述","authors":"Rukayya Ibrahim Muazu , Polina Yaseneva , Nilay Shah , Maria-Magdalena Titirici","doi":"10.1016/j.jece.2024.114387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bioderived advanced materials possess unique functional properties together with a potential to improve environmental sustainability. This study conducts a critical review of literature on life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) of biobased higher-value products with emphasis on bioderived advanced materials including nanocelluloses (cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and cellulose nanofibers (CNFs)), and carbon materials (lignin carbon fibre (LCF) and hard carbons (HCs)). The environmental impact of CNCs production from Kraft and dissolving pulp via sulfuric acid hydrolysis is significantly influenced by the end-of-life (EoL) management of sulfuric acid either via recycling or neutralisation with sodium hydroxide. This highlights trade-offs and the need for more sustainable EoL options. Likewise, the production of CNFs using Kraft, dissolving and sulfite pulp via 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) oxidation followed by mechanical homogenisation or sonication indicates higher environmental impact compared with enzymatic hydrolysis. Sustainability of LCF is significantly influenced by the lignin recovery and fabrication technique, thus low-cost sustainable solvents and pathways for LCF production should be prioritised. Existing studies indicate the advantages of HCs production via hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC). However, the sustainability performance of HC is highly influenced by the carbon yield and electrochemical performance, therefore, a comprehensive optimisation of the operating variables is crucial for advancing the sustainability and development of bioderived HCs for energy applications. Significant methodological disparities were observed among the reviewed studies, leading to variations in assessment outcomes. Economic and environmental assessments are frequently presented as standalone results even for combined assessments, which further stresses the inherent heterogeneity across assessment tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","volume":"12 6","pages":"Article 114387"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle sustainability assessment of bioderived advanced materials: A state-of-the-art Review\",\"authors\":\"Rukayya Ibrahim Muazu , Polina Yaseneva , Nilay Shah , Maria-Magdalena Titirici\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jece.2024.114387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Bioderived advanced materials possess unique functional properties together with a potential to improve environmental sustainability. This study conducts a critical review of literature on life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) of biobased higher-value products with emphasis on bioderived advanced materials including nanocelluloses (cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and cellulose nanofibers (CNFs)), and carbon materials (lignin carbon fibre (LCF) and hard carbons (HCs)). The environmental impact of CNCs production from Kraft and dissolving pulp via sulfuric acid hydrolysis is significantly influenced by the end-of-life (EoL) management of sulfuric acid either via recycling or neutralisation with sodium hydroxide. This highlights trade-offs and the need for more sustainable EoL options. Likewise, the production of CNFs using Kraft, dissolving and sulfite pulp via 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) oxidation followed by mechanical homogenisation or sonication indicates higher environmental impact compared with enzymatic hydrolysis. Sustainability of LCF is significantly influenced by the lignin recovery and fabrication technique, thus low-cost sustainable solvents and pathways for LCF production should be prioritised. Existing studies indicate the advantages of HCs production via hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC). However, the sustainability performance of HC is highly influenced by the carbon yield and electrochemical performance, therefore, a comprehensive optimisation of the operating variables is crucial for advancing the sustainability and development of bioderived HCs for energy applications. Significant methodological disparities were observed among the reviewed studies, leading to variations in assessment outcomes. Economic and environmental assessments are frequently presented as standalone results even for combined assessments, which further stresses the inherent heterogeneity across assessment tools.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 114387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213343724025181\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213343724025181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Life cycle sustainability assessment of bioderived advanced materials: A state-of-the-art Review
Bioderived advanced materials possess unique functional properties together with a potential to improve environmental sustainability. This study conducts a critical review of literature on life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) of biobased higher-value products with emphasis on bioderived advanced materials including nanocelluloses (cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and cellulose nanofibers (CNFs)), and carbon materials (lignin carbon fibre (LCF) and hard carbons (HCs)). The environmental impact of CNCs production from Kraft and dissolving pulp via sulfuric acid hydrolysis is significantly influenced by the end-of-life (EoL) management of sulfuric acid either via recycling or neutralisation with sodium hydroxide. This highlights trade-offs and the need for more sustainable EoL options. Likewise, the production of CNFs using Kraft, dissolving and sulfite pulp via 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) oxidation followed by mechanical homogenisation or sonication indicates higher environmental impact compared with enzymatic hydrolysis. Sustainability of LCF is significantly influenced by the lignin recovery and fabrication technique, thus low-cost sustainable solvents and pathways for LCF production should be prioritised. Existing studies indicate the advantages of HCs production via hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC). However, the sustainability performance of HC is highly influenced by the carbon yield and electrochemical performance, therefore, a comprehensive optimisation of the operating variables is crucial for advancing the sustainability and development of bioderived HCs for energy applications. Significant methodological disparities were observed among the reviewed studies, leading to variations in assessment outcomes. Economic and environmental assessments are frequently presented as standalone results even for combined assessments, which further stresses the inherent heterogeneity across assessment tools.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering (JECE) serves as a platform for the dissemination of original and innovative research focusing on the advancement of environmentally-friendly, sustainable technologies. JECE emphasizes the transition towards a carbon-neutral circular economy and a self-sufficient bio-based economy. Topics covered include soil, water, wastewater, and air decontamination; pollution monitoring, prevention, and control; advanced analytics, sensors, impact and risk assessment methodologies in environmental chemical engineering; resource recovery (water, nutrients, materials, energy); industrial ecology; valorization of waste streams; waste management (including e-waste); climate-water-energy-food nexus; novel materials for environmental, chemical, and energy applications; sustainability and environmental safety; water digitalization, water data science, and machine learning; process integration and intensification; recent developments in green chemistry for synthesis, catalysis, and energy; and original research on contaminants of emerging concern, persistent chemicals, and priority substances, including microplastics, nanoplastics, nanomaterials, micropollutants, antimicrobial resistance genes, and emerging pathogens (viruses, bacteria, parasites) of environmental significance.