{"title":"每周一次的病房人际治疗小组能否减轻急性精神病住院患者的心理压力?服务评估","authors":"Emily Staite, Farah Francine","doi":"10.1002/capr.12812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There is a limited amount of research assessing the effectiveness of group therapy on acute inpatient psychiatric wards, and mixed results from research assessing inpatient psychological therapies in general. Previous studies highlight challenges for conducting research on psychiatric inpatient hospitals, such as short admissions, high patient turnover, engagement challenges, acuteness of illness, overmedication and feelings of stigma and disempowerment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This service evaluation aims to assess whether weekly ward-based interpersonal group therapy reduces short-term psychological distress for women on an acute psychiatric inpatient ward in inner-city London (Tower Hamlets), UK.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This service evaluation compared psychological distress, as measured by the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation 10 (CORE-10), pre- and post-intervention for women attending a weekly ward-based interpersonal therapy group between February 2023 and August 2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 46 participants included in the analysis. There was an 11.3% decrease in the mean CORE-10 score post-intervention. Four (9%) patients exhibited significant and reliable change (i.e. short-term psychological distress reduced to a ‘healthy’ level). A further three (7%) patients exhibited no significant change. Short-term psychological distress did not significantly deteriorate for any patients who attended the ward-based interpersonal therapy group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>It is feasible to collect pre- and post-outcome data to assess psychological distress following a weekly ward-based interpersonal therapy group over a 6-month period, which meet acceptable a priori sample size calculations. The group appears to have an immediate positive impact for the majority (95%) of patients where short-term psychological distress reduced or stayed the same; however, this was only significant for 16% of patients. It would be important to collect qualitative data, ideally using multiple methods or data sources for triangulation, in order to corroborate and strengthen the current findings. Practitioners cannot rely solely on the results of this study to demonstrate effectiveness of psychotherapeutic group interventions in acute inpatient settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does a weekly ward-based interpersonal therapy group reduce psychological distress for women in an acute psychiatric inpatient hospital? A service evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Emily Staite, Farah Francine\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/capr.12812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is a limited amount of research assessing the effectiveness of group therapy on acute inpatient psychiatric wards, and mixed results from research assessing inpatient psychological therapies in general. Previous studies highlight challenges for conducting research on psychiatric inpatient hospitals, such as short admissions, high patient turnover, engagement challenges, acuteness of illness, overmedication and feelings of stigma and disempowerment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>This service evaluation aims to assess whether weekly ward-based interpersonal group therapy reduces short-term psychological distress for women on an acute psychiatric inpatient ward in inner-city London (Tower Hamlets), UK.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This service evaluation compared psychological distress, as measured by the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation 10 (CORE-10), pre- and post-intervention for women attending a weekly ward-based interpersonal therapy group between February 2023 and August 2023.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There were 46 participants included in the analysis. There was an 11.3% decrease in the mean CORE-10 score post-intervention. Four (9%) patients exhibited significant and reliable change (i.e. short-term psychological distress reduced to a ‘healthy’ level). A further three (7%) patients exhibited no significant change. Short-term psychological distress did not significantly deteriorate for any patients who attended the ward-based interpersonal therapy group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>It is feasible to collect pre- and post-outcome data to assess psychological distress following a weekly ward-based interpersonal therapy group over a 6-month period, which meet acceptable a priori sample size calculations. The group appears to have an immediate positive impact for the majority (95%) of patients where short-term psychological distress reduced or stayed the same; however, this was only significant for 16% of patients. It would be important to collect qualitative data, ideally using multiple methods or data sources for triangulation, in order to corroborate and strengthen the current findings. Practitioners cannot rely solely on the results of this study to demonstrate effectiveness of psychotherapeutic group interventions in acute inpatient settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does a weekly ward-based interpersonal therapy group reduce psychological distress for women in an acute psychiatric inpatient hospital? A service evaluation
Background
There is a limited amount of research assessing the effectiveness of group therapy on acute inpatient psychiatric wards, and mixed results from research assessing inpatient psychological therapies in general. Previous studies highlight challenges for conducting research on psychiatric inpatient hospitals, such as short admissions, high patient turnover, engagement challenges, acuteness of illness, overmedication and feelings of stigma and disempowerment.
Aims
This service evaluation aims to assess whether weekly ward-based interpersonal group therapy reduces short-term psychological distress for women on an acute psychiatric inpatient ward in inner-city London (Tower Hamlets), UK.
Methods
This service evaluation compared psychological distress, as measured by the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation 10 (CORE-10), pre- and post-intervention for women attending a weekly ward-based interpersonal therapy group between February 2023 and August 2023.
Results
There were 46 participants included in the analysis. There was an 11.3% decrease in the mean CORE-10 score post-intervention. Four (9%) patients exhibited significant and reliable change (i.e. short-term psychological distress reduced to a ‘healthy’ level). A further three (7%) patients exhibited no significant change. Short-term psychological distress did not significantly deteriorate for any patients who attended the ward-based interpersonal therapy group.
Conclusion
It is feasible to collect pre- and post-outcome data to assess psychological distress following a weekly ward-based interpersonal therapy group over a 6-month period, which meet acceptable a priori sample size calculations. The group appears to have an immediate positive impact for the majority (95%) of patients where short-term psychological distress reduced or stayed the same; however, this was only significant for 16% of patients. It would be important to collect qualitative data, ideally using multiple methods or data sources for triangulation, in order to corroborate and strengthen the current findings. Practitioners cannot rely solely on the results of this study to demonstrate effectiveness of psychotherapeutic group interventions in acute inpatient settings.
期刊介绍:
Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.