{"title":"从神经变异体肯定关系实践的角度:探索身份和治疗过程","authors":"Samantha Fuld, M. R. McKelvie","doi":"10.1002/capr.12792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This commentary examines the historic primacy of behavioural interventions in psychotherapeutic work with neurodivergent people. Such interventions have been increasingly criticised as failing to affirm aspects of neurodivergence as significant for one's identity and positive sense of self, instead emphasising conformity to socially and academically determined norms, which may not always be the goals of the individual engaging with therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Relational therapeutic interventions, which have not traditionally been centred in clinical approaches with this group of people, have great potential to address the inadequacies of more behaviourally oriented modalities as they were designed to address experiences of internalised stigma and invalidation, enhance a cohesive sense of self, affirm intersectional identity, tune into emotional experiences, and engage in healing through relationships and connection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>While further research is needed to support the efficacy of relational approaches in work alongside neurodivergent people, their application is promising and aligned with the expressed needs of this community.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A perspective on neurodivergent-affirming relational practice: Exploration of identity and the healing process\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Fuld, M. R. McKelvie\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/capr.12792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>This commentary examines the historic primacy of behavioural interventions in psychotherapeutic work with neurodivergent people. Such interventions have been increasingly criticised as failing to affirm aspects of neurodivergence as significant for one's identity and positive sense of self, instead emphasising conformity to socially and academically determined norms, which may not always be the goals of the individual engaging with therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Relational therapeutic interventions, which have not traditionally been centred in clinical approaches with this group of people, have great potential to address the inadequacies of more behaviourally oriented modalities as they were designed to address experiences of internalised stigma and invalidation, enhance a cohesive sense of self, affirm intersectional identity, tune into emotional experiences, and engage in healing through relationships and connection.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>While further research is needed to support the efficacy of relational approaches in work alongside neurodivergent people, their application is promising and aligned with the expressed needs of this community.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A perspective on neurodivergent-affirming relational practice: Exploration of identity and the healing process
Background
This commentary examines the historic primacy of behavioural interventions in psychotherapeutic work with neurodivergent people. Such interventions have been increasingly criticised as failing to affirm aspects of neurodivergence as significant for one's identity and positive sense of self, instead emphasising conformity to socially and academically determined norms, which may not always be the goals of the individual engaging with therapy.
Findings
Relational therapeutic interventions, which have not traditionally been centred in clinical approaches with this group of people, have great potential to address the inadequacies of more behaviourally oriented modalities as they were designed to address experiences of internalised stigma and invalidation, enhance a cohesive sense of self, affirm intersectional identity, tune into emotional experiences, and engage in healing through relationships and connection.
Discussion
While further research is needed to support the efficacy of relational approaches in work alongside neurodivergent people, their application is promising and aligned with the expressed needs of this community.
期刊介绍:
Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.