M. N. Siegelman, R. A. McCarthy, A. P. Young, W. O’Reilly, H. Matsumoto, M. Johnson, C. Mack, R. T. Guza
{"title":"两个海滩的空中剖面图:平衡与机器学习","authors":"M. N. Siegelman, R. A. McCarthy, A. P. Young, W. O’Reilly, H. Matsumoto, M. Johnson, C. Mack, R. T. Guza","doi":"10.1029/2023JF007524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Shoreline position (e.g., beach width) is a critical component of flooding and overtopping forecasts but difficult to predict accurately. We model beach width changes with a supervised machine learning (ML) approach informed by equilibrium principles. The time history of wave energy anomalies that force equilibrium models is used as an ML input feature. The sweeping simplifying equilibrium model assumptions relating beach width change to anomalies are replaced with data-based ML results. Supervised learning regression methods including linear, support vector, decision trees, and ensemble regressors are tested. Observations for model training and testing includes weekly to quarterly beach elevation surveys spanning approximately 500 m alongshore and 8 years at two beaches, each supplemented with several months of ∼100 sub-weekly surveys. These beaches, with different sediment types (sand vs. sand-cobble mix), both widen in summer in response to the seasonal wave climate, in agreement with a generic equilibrium model. Differences in backshore erodability contribute to differing beach responses in the stormiest (El Niño) year that are reproduced by a simple extra trees regression model but not by the equilibrium model. With sufficiently extensive training data, the ML model outperforms equilibrium by providing flexibility and complexity in the response to wave forcing. The present ML and equilibrium models both fail to simulate a uniquely stunted beach recovery unlike other recoveries in the training data.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","volume":"129 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023JF007524","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subaerial Profiles at Two Beaches: Equilibrium and Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"M. N. Siegelman, R. A. McCarthy, A. P. Young, W. O’Reilly, H. Matsumoto, M. Johnson, C. Mack, R. T. Guza\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2023JF007524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Shoreline position (e.g., beach width) is a critical component of flooding and overtopping forecasts but difficult to predict accurately. We model beach width changes with a supervised machine learning (ML) approach informed by equilibrium principles. The time history of wave energy anomalies that force equilibrium models is used as an ML input feature. The sweeping simplifying equilibrium model assumptions relating beach width change to anomalies are replaced with data-based ML results. Supervised learning regression methods including linear, support vector, decision trees, and ensemble regressors are tested. Observations for model training and testing includes weekly to quarterly beach elevation surveys spanning approximately 500 m alongshore and 8 years at two beaches, each supplemented with several months of ∼100 sub-weekly surveys. These beaches, with different sediment types (sand vs. sand-cobble mix), both widen in summer in response to the seasonal wave climate, in agreement with a generic equilibrium model. Differences in backshore erodability contribute to differing beach responses in the stormiest (El Niño) year that are reproduced by a simple extra trees regression model but not by the equilibrium model. With sufficiently extensive training data, the ML model outperforms equilibrium by providing flexibility and complexity in the response to wave forcing. The present ML and equilibrium models both fail to simulate a uniquely stunted beach recovery unlike other recoveries in the training data.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface\",\"volume\":\"129 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023JF007524\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023JF007524\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023JF007524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
海岸线位置(如海滩宽度)是洪水和倾覆预测的重要组成部分,但很难准确预测。我们根据平衡原理,采用有监督的机器学习(ML)方法对海滩宽度变化进行建模。波浪能量异常的时间历史迫使平衡模型被用作 ML 输入特征。基于数据的 ML 结果取代了将海滩宽度变化与异常现象相关的简化平衡模型假设。对包括线性、支持向量、决策树和集合回归因子在内的监督学习回归方法进行了测试。用于模型训练和测试的观测数据包括每周至每季度的海滩海拔调查,沿岸跨度约 500 米,在两个海滩进行了 8 年的调查,每个海滩还补充了几个月的 100 次以下的每周调查。这些海滩的沉积物类型不同(沙与沙卵石混合物),在夏季都会随着季节性波浪气候的变化而变宽,这与一般平衡模型一致。后岸可侵蚀性的差异导致了最暴风雨年(厄尔尼诺现象)海滩反应的不同,简单的额外树回归模型可以再现这种反应,而平衡模型则无法再现。在有足够多的训练数据的情况下,ML 模型在对波浪作用力的响应方面具有灵活性和复杂性,因而优于均衡模型。与训练数据中的其他恢复情况不同,目前的 ML 模型和平衡模型都无法模拟出独特的发育不良的海滩恢复情况。
Subaerial Profiles at Two Beaches: Equilibrium and Machine Learning
Shoreline position (e.g., beach width) is a critical component of flooding and overtopping forecasts but difficult to predict accurately. We model beach width changes with a supervised machine learning (ML) approach informed by equilibrium principles. The time history of wave energy anomalies that force equilibrium models is used as an ML input feature. The sweeping simplifying equilibrium model assumptions relating beach width change to anomalies are replaced with data-based ML results. Supervised learning regression methods including linear, support vector, decision trees, and ensemble regressors are tested. Observations for model training and testing includes weekly to quarterly beach elevation surveys spanning approximately 500 m alongshore and 8 years at two beaches, each supplemented with several months of ∼100 sub-weekly surveys. These beaches, with different sediment types (sand vs. sand-cobble mix), both widen in summer in response to the seasonal wave climate, in agreement with a generic equilibrium model. Differences in backshore erodability contribute to differing beach responses in the stormiest (El Niño) year that are reproduced by a simple extra trees regression model but not by the equilibrium model. With sufficiently extensive training data, the ML model outperforms equilibrium by providing flexibility and complexity in the response to wave forcing. The present ML and equilibrium models both fail to simulate a uniquely stunted beach recovery unlike other recoveries in the training data.