美国大西洋中部溪流湍急的驱动因素和缓冲区

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science Hydrological Processes Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1002/hyp.15302
Rachel Hurley, David Brandes, Christa Kelleher
{"title":"美国大西洋中部溪流湍急的驱动因素和缓冲区","authors":"Rachel Hurley,&nbsp;David Brandes,&nbsp;Christa Kelleher","doi":"10.1002/hyp.15302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Flashiness is a hydrologic signature used to describe the responsiveness of streamflow to precipitation. In practise, flashiness has most often been correlated with rainfall intensity and the presence of urban land cover or imperviousness. However, a number of watershed characteristics can influence flashiness, necessitating further investigation of how this particular watershed behaviour and its associated drivers vary at regional scales. We investigated how ten measurable watershed characteristics are empirically related to flashiness of 195 gauged streams in the Mid-Atlantic region using linear regression analysis. The selected gauges had drainage areas ranging in size from 15 to 250 km<sup>2</sup>. To explore multiple quantifications of flashiness, we determined both the Richards-Baker flashiness index, calculated from the continuous hydrograph, and number of peaks-over-threshold, for all watersheds for a 10-year period. As found in other studies, the percentage of watershed development was strongly correlated with stream flashiness, though significant inverse relationships also existed for forest cover, water and wetlands and carbonate geology. Differences in flashiness values between rural and suburban watersheds were not significant, with a significant increase in flashiness (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) occurring at 80% development or ~ 25% imperviousness. In addition, we found significant differences in relationships between watershed characteristics and flashiness when differentiated by physiographic regions. For the study area and each of its five physiographic sub-regions, we identified the four most important predictors through multiple regression. The overall mid-Atlantic model suggested that development, wetlands and compactness ratio as the most important predictors (adj <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.57). Significant predictors of stream flashiness varied among regions; however, wetlands served as a significant buffer of flashiness in four of five sub-regions demonstrating the importance of wetlands in modulating flash-flooding. In all physiographic regions, empirical models of flashiness values outperformed the Mid-Atlantic regional model, underscoring the value of local landscape characteristics in augmenting or modulating flashy watershed responses. Our findings suggest the potential for improvements to operational flash-flood forecasting using hydrologic characteristics of the landscape.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"38 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drivers and Buffers of Stream Flashiness in the Mid-Atlantic United States\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Hurley,&nbsp;David Brandes,&nbsp;Christa Kelleher\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hyp.15302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Flashiness is a hydrologic signature used to describe the responsiveness of streamflow to precipitation. In practise, flashiness has most often been correlated with rainfall intensity and the presence of urban land cover or imperviousness. However, a number of watershed characteristics can influence flashiness, necessitating further investigation of how this particular watershed behaviour and its associated drivers vary at regional scales. We investigated how ten measurable watershed characteristics are empirically related to flashiness of 195 gauged streams in the Mid-Atlantic region using linear regression analysis. The selected gauges had drainage areas ranging in size from 15 to 250 km<sup>2</sup>. To explore multiple quantifications of flashiness, we determined both the Richards-Baker flashiness index, calculated from the continuous hydrograph, and number of peaks-over-threshold, for all watersheds for a 10-year period. As found in other studies, the percentage of watershed development was strongly correlated with stream flashiness, though significant inverse relationships also existed for forest cover, water and wetlands and carbonate geology. Differences in flashiness values between rural and suburban watersheds were not significant, with a significant increase in flashiness (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) occurring at 80% development or ~ 25% imperviousness. In addition, we found significant differences in relationships between watershed characteristics and flashiness when differentiated by physiographic regions. For the study area and each of its five physiographic sub-regions, we identified the four most important predictors through multiple regression. The overall mid-Atlantic model suggested that development, wetlands and compactness ratio as the most important predictors (adj <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.57). Significant predictors of stream flashiness varied among regions; however, wetlands served as a significant buffer of flashiness in four of five sub-regions demonstrating the importance of wetlands in modulating flash-flooding. In all physiographic regions, empirical models of flashiness values outperformed the Mid-Atlantic regional model, underscoring the value of local landscape characteristics in augmenting or modulating flashy watershed responses. Our findings suggest the potential for improvements to operational flash-flood forecasting using hydrologic characteristics of the landscape.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"volume\":\"38 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.15302\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.15302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

暴雨性是一种水文特征,用于描述溪流对降水的反应能力。在实践中,闪蒸通常与降雨强度、城市土地覆盖或不透水有关。然而,许多流域特征都会影响闪蒸性,因此有必要进一步研究这种特殊的流域行为及其相关驱动因素在区域范围内的变化情况。我们采用线性回归分析方法,研究了大西洋中部地区 195 条测量溪流的十个可测量流域特征与闪蒸性之间的经验关系。所选测量值的流域面积从 15 平方公里到 250 平方公里不等。为了探索湍急度的多种量化方法,我们确定了根据连续水文图计算得出的理查兹-贝克湍急度指数,以及所有流域 10 年内超过阈值的峰值数量。正如其他研究发现的那样,流域开发百分比与溪流湍急度密切相关,但森林覆盖率、水和湿地以及碳酸盐地质也存在显著的反比关系。农村流域和郊区流域之间的闪烁度值差异并不显著,当开发程度达到 80% 或不透水程度达到 25% 左右时,闪烁度会显著增加(p < 0.01)。此外,我们还发现,根据不同的地貌区域,流域特征与闪蒸度之间的关系也存在显著差异。对于研究区域及其五个地貌亚区,我们通过多元回归确定了四个最重要的预测因子。大西洋中部的整体模型表明,开发、湿地和紧凑率是最重要的预测因素(adj R2 = 0.57)。不同地区对溪流山洪暴发的重要预测因素各不相同;但是,在五个次区域中,有四个次区域的湿地是山洪暴发的重要缓冲区,这表明了湿地在调节山洪暴发方面的重要性。在所有地貌区域,闪蒸值的经验模型都优于中大西洋区域模型,这突出表明了当地地貌特征在增强或调节流域闪蒸响应方面的价值。我们的研究结果表明,利用地貌的水文特征改进山洪灾害业务预报是有潜力的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drivers and Buffers of Stream Flashiness in the Mid-Atlantic United States

Flashiness is a hydrologic signature used to describe the responsiveness of streamflow to precipitation. In practise, flashiness has most often been correlated with rainfall intensity and the presence of urban land cover or imperviousness. However, a number of watershed characteristics can influence flashiness, necessitating further investigation of how this particular watershed behaviour and its associated drivers vary at regional scales. We investigated how ten measurable watershed characteristics are empirically related to flashiness of 195 gauged streams in the Mid-Atlantic region using linear regression analysis. The selected gauges had drainage areas ranging in size from 15 to 250 km2. To explore multiple quantifications of flashiness, we determined both the Richards-Baker flashiness index, calculated from the continuous hydrograph, and number of peaks-over-threshold, for all watersheds for a 10-year period. As found in other studies, the percentage of watershed development was strongly correlated with stream flashiness, though significant inverse relationships also existed for forest cover, water and wetlands and carbonate geology. Differences in flashiness values between rural and suburban watersheds were not significant, with a significant increase in flashiness (p < 0.01) occurring at 80% development or ~ 25% imperviousness. In addition, we found significant differences in relationships between watershed characteristics and flashiness when differentiated by physiographic regions. For the study area and each of its five physiographic sub-regions, we identified the four most important predictors through multiple regression. The overall mid-Atlantic model suggested that development, wetlands and compactness ratio as the most important predictors (adj R2 = 0.57). Significant predictors of stream flashiness varied among regions; however, wetlands served as a significant buffer of flashiness in four of five sub-regions demonstrating the importance of wetlands in modulating flash-flooding. In all physiographic regions, empirical models of flashiness values outperformed the Mid-Atlantic regional model, underscoring the value of local landscape characteristics in augmenting or modulating flashy watershed responses. Our findings suggest the potential for improvements to operational flash-flood forecasting using hydrologic characteristics of the landscape.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
期刊最新文献
Modelling Groundwater Hydrological Drought and Its Recovery Given Natural and Anthropogenic Scenarios in South America Hydrological Dynamics in Response to Vegetation Restoration in a Typical Wind–Water Erosion Crisscross Catchment A Comprehensive Evaluation of Agricultural Drought Vulnerability Using Fuzzy-AHP-Based Composite Index Integrating Sensitivity and Adaptive Capacity A Tale of Two Storms: Inter-Storm Variability of Stable Water Isotopes in a Solute Transport Model Geostatistical Interpolation Approach for Improving Flood Simulation Within a Data-Scarce Region in the Tibetan Plateau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1