用于指导橡树枯萎病 eDNA 监测的 Bretziella fagacearum 分子检测测定的实验室间评估

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1002/edn3.70012
Marie-Krystel Gauthier, Abdelmadjid Djoumad, Tara L. Bal, Guillaume J. Bilodeau, Marc F. DiGirolomo, Meher Ony, Denita Hadziabdic, Kelsey C. McLaughlin, Laura Miles, Isabel Munck, Karen Lynn Snover-Clift, Philippe Tanguay
{"title":"用于指导橡树枯萎病 eDNA 监测的 Bretziella fagacearum 分子检测测定的实验室间评估","authors":"Marie-Krystel Gauthier,&nbsp;Abdelmadjid Djoumad,&nbsp;Tara L. Bal,&nbsp;Guillaume J. Bilodeau,&nbsp;Marc F. DiGirolomo,&nbsp;Meher Ony,&nbsp;Denita Hadziabdic,&nbsp;Kelsey C. McLaughlin,&nbsp;Laura Miles,&nbsp;Isabel Munck,&nbsp;Karen Lynn Snover-Clift,&nbsp;Philippe Tanguay","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Oak wilt disease, caused by the fungus <i>Bretziella fagacearum</i>, can kill mature red oaks within months of infection, severely affecting biodiversity, landscapes, and industries. The disease, originally only present in the United States, was officially reported for the first time in Canada in June 2023. The aim of this study was to suggest a standardized assay and sample processing method to optimize oak wilt detection both in infection centers and ahead of the disease front. Two previously published molecular assays, a Nested PCR and a TaqMan qPCR, were compared to detect <i>B. fagacearum</i> in a variety of samples in a ring trial across five laboratories. Sample types investigated included eDNA from trapped insect vectors (sorted insects and bulk content from traps), infested and healthy oak wood chips, and <i>B. fagacearum</i> conidia dilutions. Results demonstrated that both Nested and TaqMan assays can be used for molecular confirmation of oak wilt, and results are reproducible across different labs. There is a general agreement between both detection assays when testing true-positive and true-negative samples. Both methods demonstrated overall good accuracy. The TaqMan assay was more sensitive and detected lower amounts of DNA target. Both tests were 100% specific to oak wood samples, which was the best sample type to use for detection. In general, samples with high Cts were more prompted to yield false negative Nested results. Detecting oak wilt from bulk insect samples was by far more rapid than sorted sap beetles, but resulted in lower detection signals, especially with the Nested assay. The time-period when the insect traps were set up also had considerable influence on detection results. We hope this study helps to formulate guidelines in oak wilt detection and biosurveillance management.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interlaboratory Evaluation of Bretziella fagacearum Molecular Detection Assays to Guide the eDNA Monitoring of Oak Wilt Disease\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Krystel Gauthier,&nbsp;Abdelmadjid Djoumad,&nbsp;Tara L. Bal,&nbsp;Guillaume J. Bilodeau,&nbsp;Marc F. DiGirolomo,&nbsp;Meher Ony,&nbsp;Denita Hadziabdic,&nbsp;Kelsey C. McLaughlin,&nbsp;Laura Miles,&nbsp;Isabel Munck,&nbsp;Karen Lynn Snover-Clift,&nbsp;Philippe Tanguay\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Oak wilt disease, caused by the fungus <i>Bretziella fagacearum</i>, can kill mature red oaks within months of infection, severely affecting biodiversity, landscapes, and industries. The disease, originally only present in the United States, was officially reported for the first time in Canada in June 2023. The aim of this study was to suggest a standardized assay and sample processing method to optimize oak wilt detection both in infection centers and ahead of the disease front. Two previously published molecular assays, a Nested PCR and a TaqMan qPCR, were compared to detect <i>B. fagacearum</i> in a variety of samples in a ring trial across five laboratories. Sample types investigated included eDNA from trapped insect vectors (sorted insects and bulk content from traps), infested and healthy oak wood chips, and <i>B. fagacearum</i> conidia dilutions. Results demonstrated that both Nested and TaqMan assays can be used for molecular confirmation of oak wilt, and results are reproducible across different labs. There is a general agreement between both detection assays when testing true-positive and true-negative samples. Both methods demonstrated overall good accuracy. The TaqMan assay was more sensitive and detected lower amounts of DNA target. Both tests were 100% specific to oak wood samples, which was the best sample type to use for detection. In general, samples with high Cts were more prompted to yield false negative Nested results. Detecting oak wilt from bulk insect samples was by far more rapid than sorted sap beetles, but resulted in lower detection signals, especially with the Nested assay. The time-period when the insect traps were set up also had considerable influence on detection results. We hope this study helps to formulate guidelines in oak wilt detection and biosurveillance management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

橡树枯萎病由真菌 Bretziella fagacearum 引起,可在感染后数月内杀死成熟的红橡树,严重影响生物多样性、景观和产业。这种疾病最初只出现在美国,2023 年 6 月加拿大首次正式报告了这种疾病。本研究旨在提出一种标准化的检测方法和样本处理方法,以优化在感染中心和发病前线的橡树枯萎病检测。在五家实验室进行的环试中,比较了之前发布的两种分子检测方法(巢式 PCR 和 TaqMan qPCR),以检测各种样本中的法氏囊虫。调查的样品类型包括诱捕昆虫载体的 eDNA(分类昆虫和诱捕器中的大块内容物)、受侵染和健康的橡木木屑以及 B. fagacearum 分生孢子稀释液。结果表明,巢式检测法和 TaqMan 检测法都可用于栎树枯萎病的分子确证,而且不同实验室的结果具有可重复性。在检测真阳性和真阴性样本时,两种检测方法的结果基本一致。两种方法的准确性都很高。TaqMan 检测法的灵敏度更高,检测到的目标 DNA 数量更少。两种检测方法对橡木样本都具有 100% 的特异性,而橡木样本是检测的最佳样本类型。一般来说,Cts 较高的样本更容易产生假阴性的 Nested 结果。从散装昆虫样本中检测橡树枯萎病要比分拣树液甲虫快得多,但检测信号较低,特别是使用 Nested 检测法。设置昆虫诱捕器的时间段对检测结果也有很大影响。我们希望这项研究有助于制定橡树枯萎病检测和生物监测管理指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interlaboratory Evaluation of Bretziella fagacearum Molecular Detection Assays to Guide the eDNA Monitoring of Oak Wilt Disease

Oak wilt disease, caused by the fungus Bretziella fagacearum, can kill mature red oaks within months of infection, severely affecting biodiversity, landscapes, and industries. The disease, originally only present in the United States, was officially reported for the first time in Canada in June 2023. The aim of this study was to suggest a standardized assay and sample processing method to optimize oak wilt detection both in infection centers and ahead of the disease front. Two previously published molecular assays, a Nested PCR and a TaqMan qPCR, were compared to detect B. fagacearum in a variety of samples in a ring trial across five laboratories. Sample types investigated included eDNA from trapped insect vectors (sorted insects and bulk content from traps), infested and healthy oak wood chips, and B. fagacearum conidia dilutions. Results demonstrated that both Nested and TaqMan assays can be used for molecular confirmation of oak wilt, and results are reproducible across different labs. There is a general agreement between both detection assays when testing true-positive and true-negative samples. Both methods demonstrated overall good accuracy. The TaqMan assay was more sensitive and detected lower amounts of DNA target. Both tests were 100% specific to oak wood samples, which was the best sample type to use for detection. In general, samples with high Cts were more prompted to yield false negative Nested results. Detecting oak wilt from bulk insect samples was by far more rapid than sorted sap beetles, but resulted in lower detection signals, especially with the Nested assay. The time-period when the insect traps were set up also had considerable influence on detection results. We hope this study helps to formulate guidelines in oak wilt detection and biosurveillance management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Bottom Trawling and Multi-Marker eDNA Metabarcoding Surveys Reveal Highly Diverse Vertebrate and Crustacean Communities: A Case Study in an Urbanized Subtropical Estuary Evaluation of a Nanopore Sequencing Strategy on Bacterial Communities From Marine Sediments Current Trends in Biophysical Modeling of eDNA Dynamics for the Detection of Marine Species Validation of Environmental DNA for Estimating Proportional and Absolute Biomass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1