心脏移植后游离细胞 DNA 绝对定量的附加值临床实例

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1111/ctr.15477
Jens Böhmer, Håkan Wåhlander, Kristjan Karason, Jan Sunnegårdh, Carina Wasslavik, Marianne Jonsson, Julia Asp, Anne Ricksten, Göran Dellgren
{"title":"心脏移植后游离细胞 DNA 绝对定量的附加值临床实例","authors":"Jens Böhmer,&nbsp;Håkan Wåhlander,&nbsp;Kristjan Karason,&nbsp;Jan Sunnegårdh,&nbsp;Carina Wasslavik,&nbsp;Marianne Jonsson,&nbsp;Julia Asp,&nbsp;Anne Ricksten,&nbsp;Göran Dellgren","doi":"10.1111/ctr.15477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is used as a biomarker after transplantation to detect graft injury, relying on the donor fraction (DF). We have established a PCR-based approach allowing us to separately quantify absolute values of dd-cfDNA and recipient-derived cfDNA (rd-cfDNA). We aimed to present typical clinical scenarios after heart transplantation (HTx) to illustrate the advantages of absolute cfDNA values over DF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used the cfDNA results of our cohort (509 samples of 52 patients followed during the first year after HTx) as background and determined the trajectories of cfDNA in specific clinical situations. We profiled an uncomplicated clinical course, viral and bacterial infections, acute and chronic rejection, and false-negative and false-positive rejections in six patients (five adults, one child).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was a substantial discrepancy between relative (DF) and absolute cfDNA-levels in several clinical situations. Rd- and dd-cfDNA were independently elevated during episodes of rejection and infection and were better suited to depict treatment response than DF alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Absolute quantification of cfDNA may offer clinically relevant information additive to DF in various situations after HTx and could be helpful for more accurate monitoring of diagnosis and treatment of rejection.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.15477","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Examples of the Additive Value of Absolute Quantification of Cell-Free DNA After Heart Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Jens Böhmer,&nbsp;Håkan Wåhlander,&nbsp;Kristjan Karason,&nbsp;Jan Sunnegårdh,&nbsp;Carina Wasslavik,&nbsp;Marianne Jonsson,&nbsp;Julia Asp,&nbsp;Anne Ricksten,&nbsp;Göran Dellgren\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.15477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is used as a biomarker after transplantation to detect graft injury, relying on the donor fraction (DF). We have established a PCR-based approach allowing us to separately quantify absolute values of dd-cfDNA and recipient-derived cfDNA (rd-cfDNA). We aimed to present typical clinical scenarios after heart transplantation (HTx) to illustrate the advantages of absolute cfDNA values over DF.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used the cfDNA results of our cohort (509 samples of 52 patients followed during the first year after HTx) as background and determined the trajectories of cfDNA in specific clinical situations. We profiled an uncomplicated clinical course, viral and bacterial infections, acute and chronic rejection, and false-negative and false-positive rejections in six patients (five adults, one child).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There was a substantial discrepancy between relative (DF) and absolute cfDNA-levels in several clinical situations. Rd- and dd-cfDNA were independently elevated during episodes of rejection and infection and were better suited to depict treatment response than DF alone.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Absolute quantification of cfDNA may offer clinically relevant information additive to DF in various situations after HTx and could be helpful for more accurate monitoring of diagnosis and treatment of rejection.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"38 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.15477\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.15477\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.15477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 无细胞 DNA(cfDNA)是移植后检测移植物损伤的生物标志物,它依赖于供体部分(DF)。我们已经建立了一种基于 PCR 的方法,可以分别量化 DD-cfDNA 和受体衍生 cfDNA(rd-cfDNA)的绝对值。我们旨在介绍心脏移植(HTx)后的典型临床情况,以说明 cfDNA 绝对值比 DF 值更有优势。 方法 我们以队列中的 cfDNA 结果(心脏移植术后第一年随访的 52 名患者的 509 份样本)为背景,确定了特定临床情况下 cfDNA 的变化轨迹。我们对六名患者(五名成人、一名儿童)的无并发症临床过程、病毒和细菌感染、急性和慢性排斥反应、假阴性和假阳性排斥反应进行了分析。 结果 在几种临床情况下,相对(DF)和绝对 cfDNA 水平之间存在很大差异。在发生排斥反应和感染时,Rd-和dd-cfDNA会独立升高,比单独的DF更适合描述治疗反应。 结论 在 HTx 后的各种情况下,cfDNA 的绝对定量可提供与 DF 相加的临床相关信息,有助于更准确地监测排斥反应的诊断和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Examples of the Additive Value of Absolute Quantification of Cell-Free DNA After Heart Transplantation

Objective

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is used as a biomarker after transplantation to detect graft injury, relying on the donor fraction (DF). We have established a PCR-based approach allowing us to separately quantify absolute values of dd-cfDNA and recipient-derived cfDNA (rd-cfDNA). We aimed to present typical clinical scenarios after heart transplantation (HTx) to illustrate the advantages of absolute cfDNA values over DF.

Methods

We used the cfDNA results of our cohort (509 samples of 52 patients followed during the first year after HTx) as background and determined the trajectories of cfDNA in specific clinical situations. We profiled an uncomplicated clinical course, viral and bacterial infections, acute and chronic rejection, and false-negative and false-positive rejections in six patients (five adults, one child).

Results

There was a substantial discrepancy between relative (DF) and absolute cfDNA-levels in several clinical situations. Rd- and dd-cfDNA were independently elevated during episodes of rejection and infection and were better suited to depict treatment response than DF alone.

Conclusions

Absolute quantification of cfDNA may offer clinically relevant information additive to DF in various situations after HTx and could be helpful for more accurate monitoring of diagnosis and treatment of rejection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Factors Associated With Increased Mortality in Pediatric Veno-Occlusive Disease Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation CT-Based Lung Size Matching in Delayed Chest Closure for Systemic Sclerosis Lung Transplantation Impact of Letermovir for Cytomegalovirus Primary Prophylaxis on Myelosuppression and Immunosuppression in Lung Transplant Recipients Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Thalassemia Major: How Do Anti-HLA Antibodies Impact? Terbutaline for Management of Relative Bradycardia Post-Orthotopic Heart Transplant: A Single Center Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1