{"title":"我们看不到的所有位点RNA 修饰研究中假阴性的来源与缓解","authors":"Shalini Oberdoeffer, Wendy V. Gilbert","doi":"10.1038/s41580-024-00784-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>RNA modifications are essential for human health — too much or too little of them leads to serious illnesses ranging from neurodevelopmental disorders to cancer. Technical advances in RNA modification sequencing are beginning to uncover the RNA targets of diverse RNA-modifying enzymes that are dysregulated in disease. However, the emerging transcriptome-wide maps of modified nucleosides installed by these enzymes should be considered as first drafts. In particular, a range of technical artefacts lead to false negatives — modified sites that are overlooked owing to technique-dependent, and often sequence-context-specific, ‘blind spots’. In this Review, we discuss potential sources of false negatives in sequencing-based RNA modification maps, propose mitigation strategies and suggest guidelines for transparent reporting of sensitivity to detect modified sites in profiling studies. Important considerations for recognition and avoidance of false negatives include assessment and reporting of position-specific sequencing depth, identification of protocol-dependent RNA capture biases and applying controls for false negatives as well as for false positives. Despite their limitations, emerging maps of RNA modifications reveal exciting and largely uncharted potential for post-transcriptional control of all aspects of RNA function.</p>","PeriodicalId":19051,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology","volume":"23 4S 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":81.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All the sites we cannot see: Sources and mitigation of false negatives in RNA modification studies\",\"authors\":\"Shalini Oberdoeffer, Wendy V. Gilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41580-024-00784-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>RNA modifications are essential for human health — too much or too little of them leads to serious illnesses ranging from neurodevelopmental disorders to cancer. Technical advances in RNA modification sequencing are beginning to uncover the RNA targets of diverse RNA-modifying enzymes that are dysregulated in disease. However, the emerging transcriptome-wide maps of modified nucleosides installed by these enzymes should be considered as first drafts. In particular, a range of technical artefacts lead to false negatives — modified sites that are overlooked owing to technique-dependent, and often sequence-context-specific, ‘blind spots’. In this Review, we discuss potential sources of false negatives in sequencing-based RNA modification maps, propose mitigation strategies and suggest guidelines for transparent reporting of sensitivity to detect modified sites in profiling studies. Important considerations for recognition and avoidance of false negatives include assessment and reporting of position-specific sequencing depth, identification of protocol-dependent RNA capture biases and applying controls for false negatives as well as for false positives. Despite their limitations, emerging maps of RNA modifications reveal exciting and largely uncharted potential for post-transcriptional control of all aspects of RNA function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology\",\"volume\":\"23 4S 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":81.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-024-00784-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-024-00784-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
All the sites we cannot see: Sources and mitigation of false negatives in RNA modification studies
RNA modifications are essential for human health — too much or too little of them leads to serious illnesses ranging from neurodevelopmental disorders to cancer. Technical advances in RNA modification sequencing are beginning to uncover the RNA targets of diverse RNA-modifying enzymes that are dysregulated in disease. However, the emerging transcriptome-wide maps of modified nucleosides installed by these enzymes should be considered as first drafts. In particular, a range of technical artefacts lead to false negatives — modified sites that are overlooked owing to technique-dependent, and often sequence-context-specific, ‘blind spots’. In this Review, we discuss potential sources of false negatives in sequencing-based RNA modification maps, propose mitigation strategies and suggest guidelines for transparent reporting of sensitivity to detect modified sites in profiling studies. Important considerations for recognition and avoidance of false negatives include assessment and reporting of position-specific sequencing depth, identification of protocol-dependent RNA capture biases and applying controls for false negatives as well as for false positives. Despite their limitations, emerging maps of RNA modifications reveal exciting and largely uncharted potential for post-transcriptional control of all aspects of RNA function.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology is a prestigious journal that aims to be the primary source of reviews and commentaries for the scientific communities it serves. The journal strives to publish articles that are authoritative, accessible, and enriched with easily understandable figures, tables, and other display items. The goal is to provide an unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, and the journal works diligently to maximize the usefulness and impact of each article. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology publishes a variety of article types, including Reviews, Perspectives, Comments, and Research Highlights, all of which are relevant to molecular and cell biologists. The journal's broad scope ensures that the articles it publishes reach the widest possible audience.