Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma, Jui-En Lo, Vasileios C. Kyttaris, George C. Tsokos, Karen H. Costenbader
{"title":"钠-葡萄糖协同转运体 2 抑制剂用于系统性红斑狼疮合并 2 型糖尿病患者心血管和肾脏事件一级预防的有效性和安全性以及安全结果:基于人群的目标试验模拟","authors":"Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma, Jui-En Lo, Vasileios C. Kyttaris, George C. Tsokos, Karen H. Costenbader","doi":"10.1002/art.43037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were excluded from sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) clinical trials. It is unknown whether the cardiorenal benefits of SGLT2i extend to patients with SLE and comorbid type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed an emulated clinical trial in an insurance-based cohort in the United States, evaluating SGLT2i versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) for primary prevention of cardiovascular, renal, and other clinical outcomes among patients with both SLE and comorbid T2D. SGLT2i initiators were matched to DPP4i initiators using propensity scores (PSs) based on clinical and demographic factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Outcomes among 2,165 patients starting SGLT2i and 2,165 PS-matched patients starting DPP4i were compared. Over 753.1 (±479.2) mean days, SGLT2i recipients had significantly lower risks of incident acute kidney injury (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.39–0.63), chronic kidney disease (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.50–0.76), end-stage renal disease (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20–0.80), heart failure (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56–0.92), emergency department visits (HR 0.90, 0.82–0.99), and severe sepsis (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39–0.94). Risks of all-cause mortality (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.65–1.21), lupus nephritis (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.38–1.15), myocardial infarction (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.54–1.23), stroke (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.74–1.44), and hospitalizations (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.51–1.12) did not differ. Genital infection risk (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07–1.61) was increased, but urinary tract infection risk (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79–1.03) did not differ. No significant difference was observed for diabetic ketoacidosis risk (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.53–2.14) and fractures (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.66–1.36).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In this emulated clinical trial, treatment with SGLT2i, compared to DPP4i therapy, was associated with significantly reduced risks of several cardiorenal complications among patients with both SLE and T2D.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":129,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","volume":"77 4","pages":"414-422"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/art.43037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular, Renal Events, and Safety Outcomes in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Comorbid Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Target Trial Emulation\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma, Jui-En Lo, Vasileios C. Kyttaris, George C. Tsokos, Karen H. Costenbader\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/art.43037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were excluded from sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) clinical trials. It is unknown whether the cardiorenal benefits of SGLT2i extend to patients with SLE and comorbid type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We performed an emulated clinical trial in an insurance-based cohort in the United States, evaluating SGLT2i versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) for primary prevention of cardiovascular, renal, and other clinical outcomes among patients with both SLE and comorbid T2D. SGLT2i initiators were matched to DPP4i initiators using propensity scores (PSs) based on clinical and demographic factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox models.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Outcomes among 2,165 patients starting SGLT2i and 2,165 PS-matched patients starting DPP4i were compared. Over 753.1 (±479.2) mean days, SGLT2i recipients had significantly lower risks of incident acute kidney injury (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.39–0.63), chronic kidney disease (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.50–0.76), end-stage renal disease (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20–0.80), heart failure (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56–0.92), emergency department visits (HR 0.90, 0.82–0.99), and severe sepsis (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39–0.94). Risks of all-cause mortality (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.65–1.21), lupus nephritis (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.38–1.15), myocardial infarction (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.54–1.23), stroke (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.74–1.44), and hospitalizations (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.51–1.12) did not differ. Genital infection risk (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07–1.61) was increased, but urinary tract infection risk (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79–1.03) did not differ. No significant difference was observed for diabetic ketoacidosis risk (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.53–2.14) and fractures (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.66–1.36).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this emulated clinical trial, treatment with SGLT2i, compared to DPP4i therapy, was associated with significantly reduced risks of several cardiorenal complications among patients with both SLE and T2D.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis & Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"77 4\",\"pages\":\"414-422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/art.43037\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis & Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acrjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.43037\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://acrjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.43037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and Safety of Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular, Renal Events, and Safety Outcomes in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Comorbid Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Target Trial Emulation
Objective
Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were excluded from sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) clinical trials. It is unknown whether the cardiorenal benefits of SGLT2i extend to patients with SLE and comorbid type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Methods
We performed an emulated clinical trial in an insurance-based cohort in the United States, evaluating SGLT2i versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) for primary prevention of cardiovascular, renal, and other clinical outcomes among patients with both SLE and comorbid T2D. SGLT2i initiators were matched to DPP4i initiators using propensity scores (PSs) based on clinical and demographic factors. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox models.
Results
Outcomes among 2,165 patients starting SGLT2i and 2,165 PS-matched patients starting DPP4i were compared. Over 753.1 (±479.2) mean days, SGLT2i recipients had significantly lower risks of incident acute kidney injury (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.39–0.63), chronic kidney disease (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.50–0.76), end-stage renal disease (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20–0.80), heart failure (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56–0.92), emergency department visits (HR 0.90, 0.82–0.99), and severe sepsis (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39–0.94). Risks of all-cause mortality (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.65–1.21), lupus nephritis (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.38–1.15), myocardial infarction (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.54–1.23), stroke (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.74–1.44), and hospitalizations (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.51–1.12) did not differ. Genital infection risk (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07–1.61) was increased, but urinary tract infection risk (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79–1.03) did not differ. No significant difference was observed for diabetic ketoacidosis risk (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.53–2.14) and fractures (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.66–1.36).
Conclusion
In this emulated clinical trial, treatment with SGLT2i, compared to DPP4i therapy, was associated with significantly reduced risks of several cardiorenal complications among patients with both SLE and T2D.
期刊介绍:
Arthritis & Rheumatology is the official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and focuses on the natural history, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of rheumatic diseases. It is a peer-reviewed publication that aims to provide the highest quality basic and clinical research in this field. The journal covers a wide range of investigative areas and also includes review articles, editorials, and educational material for researchers and clinicians. Being recognized as a leading research journal in rheumatology, Arthritis & Rheumatology serves the global community of rheumatology investigators and clinicians.