测量稳定同位素组成的改进标准添加法及其在硫同位素组成中的应用

IF 6.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1021/acs.analchem.4c02960
Guangliang Wu, Wenjing Liu, Jian-Ming Zhu, Di Liu, Jiangyi Zhang, Zhifang Xu
{"title":"测量稳定同位素组成的改进标准添加法及其在硫同位素组成中的应用","authors":"Guangliang Wu, Wenjing Liu, Jian-Ming Zhu, Di Liu, Jiangyi Zhang, Zhifang Xu","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.4c02960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The standard addition method (SAM) is widely used to measure the isotopic compositions of natural samples, particularly those with a complex matrix. However, traditional SAM has limitations for isotope systems with significant variations in isotope composition due to its reliance on approximation in calculation and the requirement for <i>a priori</i> estimates of analyte isotopic compositions and accurate concentrations. To overcome the issues, our work proposes an improved SAM that explicitly calculates isotope ratio <i>R</i> (i.e., <sup>X</sup>E/<sup>Y</sup>E, <sup>34</sup>S/<sup>32</sup>S for example) instead of approximating <i>R</i>* (mass number of isotope X divided by total mass number of all isotopes of an element) with <i>R</i> in SAM. Additionally, the sample fraction within standard-sample mixture in improved SAM is determined using the isotope compositions of standards, sample–standard mixtures, and the mixtures of both standards, rather than relying on sample concentrations and volumes. Both improvements not only overcome the shortcomings of traditional SAM but also empowered the approach’s ability to accurately determine sample concentrations. To validate its effectiveness, we applied the improved SAM to natural samples with substantial sulfur (S) isotope variation (1.94 to 27.19‰) and low S concentration (0.81 to 3.47 μg g<sup>–1</sup>). The calculated δ<sup>34</sup>S values and concentrations of these samples are consistent with direct measurements within the error ranges while reducing sample sizes to 20% of those required for direct measurement. Moreover, our method achieves higher accuracy in δ<sup>34</sup>S values compared with traditional SAM. Both comparisons affirm the reliability and superiority of improved SAM.","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Standard Addition Method for Measuring Stable Isotopic Compositions and Its Application to Sulfur Isotope Composition\",\"authors\":\"Guangliang Wu, Wenjing Liu, Jian-Ming Zhu, Di Liu, Jiangyi Zhang, Zhifang Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.analchem.4c02960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The standard addition method (SAM) is widely used to measure the isotopic compositions of natural samples, particularly those with a complex matrix. However, traditional SAM has limitations for isotope systems with significant variations in isotope composition due to its reliance on approximation in calculation and the requirement for <i>a priori</i> estimates of analyte isotopic compositions and accurate concentrations. To overcome the issues, our work proposes an improved SAM that explicitly calculates isotope ratio <i>R</i> (i.e., <sup>X</sup>E/<sup>Y</sup>E, <sup>34</sup>S/<sup>32</sup>S for example) instead of approximating <i>R</i>* (mass number of isotope X divided by total mass number of all isotopes of an element) with <i>R</i> in SAM. Additionally, the sample fraction within standard-sample mixture in improved SAM is determined using the isotope compositions of standards, sample–standard mixtures, and the mixtures of both standards, rather than relying on sample concentrations and volumes. Both improvements not only overcome the shortcomings of traditional SAM but also empowered the approach’s ability to accurately determine sample concentrations. To validate its effectiveness, we applied the improved SAM to natural samples with substantial sulfur (S) isotope variation (1.94 to 27.19‰) and low S concentration (0.81 to 3.47 μg g<sup>–1</sup>). The calculated δ<sup>34</sup>S values and concentrations of these samples are consistent with direct measurements within the error ranges while reducing sample sizes to 20% of those required for direct measurement. Moreover, our method achieves higher accuracy in δ<sup>34</sup>S values compared with traditional SAM. Both comparisons affirm the reliability and superiority of improved SAM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":27,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c02960\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c02960","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

标准添加法(SAM)被广泛用于测量天然样本的同位素组成,尤其是那些基质复杂的样本。然而,由于传统的 SAM 依赖于近似计算,而且需要先验地估计分析物的同位素组成和准确浓度,因此对于同位素组成变化较大的同位素系统来说有其局限性。为了克服这些问题,我们的工作提出了一种改进的 SAM,即明确计算同位素比 R(例如 XE/YE、34S/32S),而不是在 SAM 中用 R*(同位素 X 的质量数除以元素所有同位素的总质量数)来近似计算 R。此外,改进型 SAM 中标准-样品混合物中的样品分数是通过标准、样品-标准混合物以及两种标准的混合物的同位素组成确定的,而不是依赖于样品浓度和体积。这两项改进不仅克服了传统 SAM 的缺点,还增强了该方法准确测定样品浓度的能力。为了验证这种方法的有效性,我们将改进后的 SAM 应用于硫 (S) 同位素变化较大(1.94 至 27.19‰)、S 浓度较低(0.81 至 3.47 μg g-1)的天然样本。这些样品的 δ34S 值和浓度的计算结果在误差范围内与直接测量值一致,同时样品量减少到直接测量值的 20%。此外,与传统的 SAM 相比,我们的方法在 δ34S 值方面实现了更高的精度。这两项比较证实了改进型 SAM 的可靠性和优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improved Standard Addition Method for Measuring Stable Isotopic Compositions and Its Application to Sulfur Isotope Composition
The standard addition method (SAM) is widely used to measure the isotopic compositions of natural samples, particularly those with a complex matrix. However, traditional SAM has limitations for isotope systems with significant variations in isotope composition due to its reliance on approximation in calculation and the requirement for a priori estimates of analyte isotopic compositions and accurate concentrations. To overcome the issues, our work proposes an improved SAM that explicitly calculates isotope ratio R (i.e., XE/YE, 34S/32S for example) instead of approximating R* (mass number of isotope X divided by total mass number of all isotopes of an element) with R in SAM. Additionally, the sample fraction within standard-sample mixture in improved SAM is determined using the isotope compositions of standards, sample–standard mixtures, and the mixtures of both standards, rather than relying on sample concentrations and volumes. Both improvements not only overcome the shortcomings of traditional SAM but also empowered the approach’s ability to accurately determine sample concentrations. To validate its effectiveness, we applied the improved SAM to natural samples with substantial sulfur (S) isotope variation (1.94 to 27.19‰) and low S concentration (0.81 to 3.47 μg g–1). The calculated δ34S values and concentrations of these samples are consistent with direct measurements within the error ranges while reducing sample sizes to 20% of those required for direct measurement. Moreover, our method achieves higher accuracy in δ34S values compared with traditional SAM. Both comparisons affirm the reliability and superiority of improved SAM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
12.20%
发文量
1949
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.
期刊最新文献
Encodable DNA Hairpin Probes for Nanopore Multiplexed Target Detection Glycan-Evocated Metallization for Amplification-Free Electrochemical Detection of Glycoproteins at Low Concentration Levels Improved Standard Addition Method for Measuring Stable Isotopic Compositions and Its Application to Sulfur Isotope Composition Long-Term Stable and Multifeature Microfluidic Impedance Flow Cytometry Based on a Constricted Channel for Single-Cell Mechanical Phenotyping COLMAR1d: A Web Server for Automated, Quantitative One-Dimensional Nuclear Magnetic Resonance-Based Metabolomics at Arbitrary Magnetic Fields
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1