小儿创伤性脑损伤:模型、治疗和结果。

Q3 Neuroscience Advances in neurobiology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-69832-3_7
Eleni H Moschonas, Ellen M Annas, Jonathan Zamudio-Flores, Jessica M Jarvis, Naima Lajud, Corina O Bondi, Anthony E Kline
{"title":"小儿创伤性脑损伤:模型、治疗和结果。","authors":"Eleni H Moschonas, Ellen M Annas, Jonathan Zamudio-Flores, Jessica M Jarvis, Naima Lajud, Corina O Bondi, Anthony E Kline","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-69832-3_7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant healthcare issue, but potential treatments are absent despite robust investigation in several clinical trials. Factors attributed to clinical TBI, such as heterogeneity of injury and single-dose pharmacological treatments as well as timing of administration, may be reasons for the negative studies. Preclinical models of TBI can reduce some of the impediments by highlighting differences in injury depending on injury severity and location and by conducting dose response studies, thus providing better therapeutic targets and pharmacological profiles for clinical use. In this chapter, there were sufficient reports to make comparisons between the models in terms of pathophysiology, behavioral dysfunction, and the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. The models used to date include controlled cortical impact (CCI), weight drop, fluid percussion, and abusive head trauma. Several therapeutics were identified after CCI injury but none in the other models, which underscores the need for studies evaluating the therapies reported after CCI injury as well as novel potential approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":7360,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neurobiology","volume":"42 ","pages":"147-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Models, Therapeutics, and Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Eleni H Moschonas, Ellen M Annas, Jonathan Zamudio-Flores, Jessica M Jarvis, Naima Lajud, Corina O Bondi, Anthony E Kline\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/978-3-031-69832-3_7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant healthcare issue, but potential treatments are absent despite robust investigation in several clinical trials. Factors attributed to clinical TBI, such as heterogeneity of injury and single-dose pharmacological treatments as well as timing of administration, may be reasons for the negative studies. Preclinical models of TBI can reduce some of the impediments by highlighting differences in injury depending on injury severity and location and by conducting dose response studies, thus providing better therapeutic targets and pharmacological profiles for clinical use. In this chapter, there were sufficient reports to make comparisons between the models in terms of pathophysiology, behavioral dysfunction, and the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. The models used to date include controlled cortical impact (CCI), weight drop, fluid percussion, and abusive head trauma. Several therapeutics were identified after CCI injury but none in the other models, which underscores the need for studies evaluating the therapies reported after CCI injury as well as novel potential approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in neurobiology\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"147-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69832-3_7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69832-3_7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小儿创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是一个重要的医疗保健问题,但尽管在多项临床试验中进行了有力的调查,却没有发现潜在的治疗方法。临床创伤性脑损伤的一些因素,如损伤的异质性、单剂量药物治疗以及给药时间等,可能是研究结果不理想的原因。创伤性脑损伤的临床前模型可通过强调损伤严重程度和部位的不同以及进行剂量反应研究来减少一些障碍,从而为临床使用提供更好的治疗目标和药理概况。在本章中,有足够的报告对各种模型的病理生理学、行为功能障碍和治疗干预措施的疗效进行了比较。迄今为止使用的模型包括受控皮层撞击(CCI)、体重下降、液体叩击和虐待性头部创伤。在CCI损伤后发现了几种治疗方法,但在其他模型中没有发现任何治疗方法,这突出表明有必要对CCI损伤后报告的治疗方法以及新的潜在方法进行研究评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Models, Therapeutics, and Outcomes.

Pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant healthcare issue, but potential treatments are absent despite robust investigation in several clinical trials. Factors attributed to clinical TBI, such as heterogeneity of injury and single-dose pharmacological treatments as well as timing of administration, may be reasons for the negative studies. Preclinical models of TBI can reduce some of the impediments by highlighting differences in injury depending on injury severity and location and by conducting dose response studies, thus providing better therapeutic targets and pharmacological profiles for clinical use. In this chapter, there were sufficient reports to make comparisons between the models in terms of pathophysiology, behavioral dysfunction, and the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. The models used to date include controlled cortical impact (CCI), weight drop, fluid percussion, and abusive head trauma. Several therapeutics were identified after CCI injury but none in the other models, which underscores the need for studies evaluating the therapies reported after CCI injury as well as novel potential approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in neurobiology
Advances in neurobiology Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Self-Similarity Logic May Shape the Organization of the Nervous System. Advances in Understanding Fractals in Affective and Anxiety Disorders. Analyzing Eye Paths Using Fractals. Box-Counting Fractal Analysis: A Primer for the Clinician. Clinical Sensitivity of Fractal Neurodynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1