心脏病专家对自动提示和信息改善心衰护理的看法。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.007
Samuel D. Maidman MD , Saul Blecker MD , Harmony R. Reynolds MD , Lawrence M. Phillips MD , Margaret M. Paul PhD , Arielle R. Nagler MD , Adam Szerencsy DO , Archana Saxena MD , Leora I. Horwitz MD , Stuart D. Katz MD , Amrita Mukhopadhyay MD
{"title":"心脏病专家对自动提示和信息改善心衰护理的看法。","authors":"Samuel D. Maidman MD ,&nbsp;Saul Blecker MD ,&nbsp;Harmony R. Reynolds MD ,&nbsp;Lawrence M. Phillips MD ,&nbsp;Margaret M. Paul PhD ,&nbsp;Arielle R. Nagler MD ,&nbsp;Adam Szerencsy DO ,&nbsp;Archana Saxena MD ,&nbsp;Leora I. Horwitz MD ,&nbsp;Stuart D. Katz MD ,&nbsp;Amrita Mukhopadhyay MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Electronic health record (EHR)-embedded tools are known to improve prescribing of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure. However, physicians may perceive EHR tools to be unhelpful and be hesitant to implement these in their practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The BETTER CARE-HF trial (NCT05275920) ran from April 28, 2022 to October 26, 2022 at NYU Langone Health outpatient clinics being seen by 180 cardiologists. The trial compared the effectiveness of an Alert during visits, Messages between visits, or usual care with the primary outcome of MRA prescribing. In this study, we sent surveys via electronic mail to cardiologists who either received an Alert or a Message during BETTER CARE-HF (60 cardiologists per survey).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 120 cardiologists who were sent the survey, response rate was 27% in the Alert group and 33% in the Message group. A majority of respondents in both the alert and message groups agreed that EHR tools were easy to use (Alert 79%; Message 69%), served as a reminder to prescribe therapy (Alert 77%; Message 77%;), and that the underlying evidence (Alert 86%; Message 62%) and clinical information (Alert 86%; Message 69%) were trustworthy. Overall, 54% agreed with continued use of the Alert, while 31% agreed with continued use of the Message.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cardiologists perceived the EHR tools to be easy to use, helpful, and improve the overall management of their patients with heart failure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"279 ","pages":"Pages 59-65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiologist perceptions on automated alerts and messages to improve heart failure care\",\"authors\":\"Samuel D. Maidman MD ,&nbsp;Saul Blecker MD ,&nbsp;Harmony R. Reynolds MD ,&nbsp;Lawrence M. Phillips MD ,&nbsp;Margaret M. Paul PhD ,&nbsp;Arielle R. Nagler MD ,&nbsp;Adam Szerencsy DO ,&nbsp;Archana Saxena MD ,&nbsp;Leora I. Horwitz MD ,&nbsp;Stuart D. Katz MD ,&nbsp;Amrita Mukhopadhyay MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Electronic health record (EHR)-embedded tools are known to improve prescribing of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure. However, physicians may perceive EHR tools to be unhelpful and be hesitant to implement these in their practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The BETTER CARE-HF trial (NCT05275920) ran from April 28, 2022 to October 26, 2022 at NYU Langone Health outpatient clinics being seen by 180 cardiologists. The trial compared the effectiveness of an Alert during visits, Messages between visits, or usual care with the primary outcome of MRA prescribing. In this study, we sent surveys via electronic mail to cardiologists who either received an Alert or a Message during BETTER CARE-HF (60 cardiologists per survey).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 120 cardiologists who were sent the survey, response rate was 27% in the Alert group and 33% in the Message group. A majority of respondents in both the alert and message groups agreed that EHR tools were easy to use (Alert 79%; Message 69%), served as a reminder to prescribe therapy (Alert 77%; Message 77%;), and that the underlying evidence (Alert 86%; Message 62%) and clinical information (Alert 86%; Message 69%) were trustworthy. Overall, 54% agreed with continued use of the Alert, while 31% agreed with continued use of the Message.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cardiologists perceived the EHR tools to be easy to use, helpful, and improve the overall management of their patients with heart failure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":\"279 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 59-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324002692\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324002692","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,电子健康记录(EHR)嵌入式工具可改善心衰患者的指导性医疗疗法(GDMT)处方。然而,医生可能会认为电子病历工具没有帮助,因此在实践中犹豫不决。我们就两种有效改善心衰护理的电子病历工具对心脏病学家进行了调查,他们认为电子病历工具易于使用、有帮助并能改善心衰患者的整体管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cardiologist perceptions on automated alerts and messages to improve heart failure care

Introduction

Electronic health record (EHR)-embedded tools are known to improve prescribing of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure. However, physicians may perceive EHR tools to be unhelpful and be hesitant to implement these in their practice.

Methods

The BETTER CARE-HF trial (NCT05275920) ran from April 28, 2022 to October 26, 2022 at NYU Langone Health outpatient clinics being seen by 180 cardiologists. The trial compared the effectiveness of an Alert during visits, Messages between visits, or usual care with the primary outcome of MRA prescribing. In this study, we sent surveys via electronic mail to cardiologists who either received an Alert or a Message during BETTER CARE-HF (60 cardiologists per survey).

Results

Of the 120 cardiologists who were sent the survey, response rate was 27% in the Alert group and 33% in the Message group. A majority of respondents in both the alert and message groups agreed that EHR tools were easy to use (Alert 79%; Message 69%), served as a reminder to prescribe therapy (Alert 77%; Message 77%;), and that the underlying evidence (Alert 86%; Message 62%) and clinical information (Alert 86%; Message 69%) were trustworthy. Overall, 54% agreed with continued use of the Alert, while 31% agreed with continued use of the Message.

Conclusion

Cardiologists perceived the EHR tools to be easy to use, helpful, and improve the overall management of their patients with heart failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
期刊最新文献
Effect of apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist and aspirin versus placebo on days alive and out of hospital: An analysis from AUGUSTUS. Chest pain and coronary artery disease in cardiac amyloidosis: Prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Changes in coverage, access, and health status among adults with cardiovascular disease after medicaid work requirements. Impact of Moderate or Severe Mitral and Tricuspid Valves Regurgitation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Efficacy of Dual Antiplatelet therapy after Ischemic Stroke According to hsCRP Levels and CYP2C19 Genotype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1