Jordan Baeker Bispo, Hyunjung Lee, Ahmedin Jemal, Farhad Islami
{"title":"美国癌症筛查与社会支持、生活安排和居住稳定性的关系。","authors":"Jordan Baeker Bispo, Hyunjung Lee, Ahmedin Jemal, Farhad Islami","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01913-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Social support has been linked to increased use of preventive care services. Living arrangements and residential stability may be important structural sources of social support, but few studies have examined their impact on cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey. Participants were classified as up-to-date or not with female breast cancer (BC), cervical cancer (CVC), and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model associations between screening and residential stability (< 1 year, 1-3 years, 4-10 years, 11-20 years, or > 20 years), living arrangement (with spouse/partner only, children only, both, or neither), and perceived social support (rarely/never, sometimes, usually, or always available), overall and stratified by sex (CRC) and age group (CVC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adjusted odds of BC (odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.81) and CVC (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.96) screening were lowest for those who reported never/rarely vs. always having social support. The adjusted odds of BC (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.22-1.70) and CRC (OR<sub>FEMALE</sub> = 1.42, 95% CI 1.20-1.68; OR<sub>MALE</sub> = 1.61, 95% CI 1.35-1.90) screening were higher for those living with a spouse/partner only vs. those living with neither spouse/partner nor children. Less residential stability was associated with increased CVC screening among females 21-34 years of age, but not BC or CRC screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social support measures were associated with screening to varying degrees by site and age, but higher perceived social support and living with a spouse/partner only demonstrated a consistent positive association. Interventions that mobilize social support networks and address the unmet social needs of parents/caregivers may improve cancer control.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations of social support, living arrangements, and residential stability with cancer screening in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Jordan Baeker Bispo, Hyunjung Lee, Ahmedin Jemal, Farhad Islami\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10552-024-01913-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Social support has been linked to increased use of preventive care services. Living arrangements and residential stability may be important structural sources of social support, but few studies have examined their impact on cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey. Participants were classified as up-to-date or not with female breast cancer (BC), cervical cancer (CVC), and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model associations between screening and residential stability (< 1 year, 1-3 years, 4-10 years, 11-20 years, or > 20 years), living arrangement (with spouse/partner only, children only, both, or neither), and perceived social support (rarely/never, sometimes, usually, or always available), overall and stratified by sex (CRC) and age group (CVC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adjusted odds of BC (odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.81) and CVC (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.96) screening were lowest for those who reported never/rarely vs. always having social support. The adjusted odds of BC (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.22-1.70) and CRC (OR<sub>FEMALE</sub> = 1.42, 95% CI 1.20-1.68; OR<sub>MALE</sub> = 1.61, 95% CI 1.35-1.90) screening were higher for those living with a spouse/partner only vs. those living with neither spouse/partner nor children. Less residential stability was associated with increased CVC screening among females 21-34 years of age, but not BC or CRC screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social support measures were associated with screening to varying degrees by site and age, but higher perceived social support and living with a spouse/partner only demonstrated a consistent positive association. Interventions that mobilize social support networks and address the unmet social needs of parents/caregivers may improve cancer control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01913-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Causes & Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01913-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:社会支持与预防保健服务使用率的提高有关。生活安排和居住稳定性可能是社会支持的重要结构性来源,但很少有研究探讨它们对癌症筛查的影响:数据来自 2021 年全国健康访谈调查。参与者被分为是否符合女性乳腺癌(BC)、宫颈癌(CVC)和结直肠癌(CRC)筛查建议。多变量逻辑回归用于模拟筛查与居住稳定性(20 年)、居住安排(仅与配偶/伴侣、仅与子女、两者或两者均无)以及感知到的社会支持(很少/从未、有时、通常或始终可用)之间的关系,并按性别(CRC)和年龄组(CVC)进行分层:报告从未/很少获得社会支持与报告总是获得社会支持的人群接受 BC(几率比 [OR] 0.61,95% CI 0.45-0.81)和 CVC(OR 0.76,95% CI 0.60-0.96)筛查的调整后几率最低。仅与配偶/伴侣居住的人群与既无配偶/伴侣也无子女居住的人群相比,BC(OR 1.44,95% CI 1.22-1.70)和 CRC(ORFEMALE = 1.42,95% CI 1.20-1.68;ORMALE = 1.61,95% CI 1.35-1.90)筛查的调整后几率更高。居住稳定性较低与 21-34 岁女性的 CVC 筛查增加有关,但与 BC 或 CRC 筛查无关:结论:社会支持措施与筛查的相关程度因地点和年龄而异,但较高的社会支持感知和仅与配偶/伴侣同住显示出一致的正相关。动员社会支持网络并解决父母/照顾者未得到满足的社会需求的干预措施可能会改善癌症控制。
Associations of social support, living arrangements, and residential stability with cancer screening in the United States.
Purpose: Social support has been linked to increased use of preventive care services. Living arrangements and residential stability may be important structural sources of social support, but few studies have examined their impact on cancer screening.
Methods: Data were from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey. Participants were classified as up-to-date or not with female breast cancer (BC), cervical cancer (CVC), and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model associations between screening and residential stability (< 1 year, 1-3 years, 4-10 years, 11-20 years, or > 20 years), living arrangement (with spouse/partner only, children only, both, or neither), and perceived social support (rarely/never, sometimes, usually, or always available), overall and stratified by sex (CRC) and age group (CVC).
Results: The adjusted odds of BC (odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.81) and CVC (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.96) screening were lowest for those who reported never/rarely vs. always having social support. The adjusted odds of BC (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.22-1.70) and CRC (ORFEMALE = 1.42, 95% CI 1.20-1.68; ORMALE = 1.61, 95% CI 1.35-1.90) screening were higher for those living with a spouse/partner only vs. those living with neither spouse/partner nor children. Less residential stability was associated with increased CVC screening among females 21-34 years of age, but not BC or CRC screening.
Conclusions: Social support measures were associated with screening to varying degrees by site and age, but higher perceived social support and living with a spouse/partner only demonstrated a consistent positive association. Interventions that mobilize social support networks and address the unmet social needs of parents/caregivers may improve cancer control.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Causes & Control is an international refereed journal that both reports and stimulates new avenues of investigation into the causes, control, and subsequent prevention of cancer. By drawing together related information published currently in a diverse range of biological and medical journals, it has a multidisciplinary and multinational approach.
The scope of the journal includes: variation in cancer distribution within and between populations; factors associated with cancer risk; preventive and therapeutic interventions on a population scale; economic, demographic, and health-policy implications of cancer; and related methodological issues.
The emphasis is on speed of publication. The journal will normally publish within 30 to 60 days of acceptance of manuscripts.
Cancer Causes & Control publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Commentaries, Opinions, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor which will have direct relevance to researchers and practitioners working in epidemiology, medical statistics, cancer biology, health education, medical economics and related fields. The journal also contains significant information for government agencies concerned with cancer research, control and policy.